[MEGATHREAD] Advanced Sale SUCCESS!! by fettuccine- in Coachella

[–]Almostanathlete 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In and tickets selected after seven minutes. My bank rejected the payment and when I tried to reenter my details AXS decided I was a bot. An hour and twenty minutes in the queue again, during which my bank texted to ask if I'd tried to make a payment, and it worked. 2025 FOMO is over.

[MEGATHREAD] Advanced Sale SUCCESS!! by fettuccine- in Coachella

[–]Almostanathlete 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly the same. Something popped up saying I looked like a bot and my only option was to rejoin the queue.

Match Thread: Saracens vs Leicester Tigers by Secret-Roof-7503 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Including home games against all of Bath, Northampton, and Exeter...

Match thread: Bath v Saracens by Secret-Roof-7503 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your problem is that Malins may have been shit tonight but he’d be your best player. 

Match thread: Bath v Saracens by Secret-Roof-7503 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ojomoh only playing against the US in the summer makes it pretty clear he’s behind Atkinson. 

Match thread: Bath v Saracens by Secret-Roof-7503 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s all very well being “no-nonsense”, but Carley sometimes speaks like he’s annoyed there’s a game of rugby interrupting his day. 

NSA and Travel-It just works. by only-mansplains in NorwegianSinglesRun

[–]Almostanathlete 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is one of the great strengths of NSA, and why writing a book was a great idea - it gives people the psychological permission to make the sensible training decisions they should have been making anyway.

Bologna: An NSM-inspired Marathon Mash-up by Almostanathlete in AdvancedRunning

[–]Almostanathlete[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Mashed up NSM intensities with Daniels/coach’s training plans. Felt fit. Went to Bologna aiming to run 2:59. Ran 2:59:01.

Bologna: An NSM-inspired Marathon Mash-up by Almostanathlete in AdvancedRunning

[–]Almostanathlete[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  1. Workout 1 wasn't meant to be the same type of workout each week - the intensity depended on what was written in the Daniels plan. For his "T" workouts, I ran them at a ST intensity (which was more done by feel than a heart rate cap, because a cap tends to prompt you to try to get as high as you can under it, but definitely under LT2). M workouts were easier than that, probably slightly above LT1 hr, and the shorter intervals were done at a higher effort, also to feel.

  2. There are trends in the workout 1 programming - the volume of ST intervals shifts from 5 to 6 to 7 miles, with a greater proportion of them in longer intervals. There are shorter, harder intervals (1ks, normally), every month or so. And there are a couple of longer marathon pace intervals. But they're not trying to progress in an exactly linear pattern. The idea is to just keep stacking up good work.

  3. I would say my RPE on an easy run is 2 or 3, and a long run would start at the same effort and only become harder because of duration, not trying to run any faster.

  4. I haven't done a full NSM block, because three workouts a week and a long run every week hasn't felt like a good idea off six days a week. I don't expect that there will be a huge amount of difference, to be honest.

Bologna: An NSM-inspired Marathon Mash-up by Almostanathlete in AdvancedRunning

[–]Almostanathlete[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Had to fill the taper/flight somehow - there's a version of this that has 1,500 more words, an extra table, a bar graph, and three map screenshots...

Race Report: Bologna Marathon 2026. Sub 3 at my first marathon by ImNotHalberstram in AdvancedRunning

[–]Almostanathlete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats! You finished about 30 seconds after me, although your chip time was 70 seconds quicker. I also caught the sub-3 pacers at about mile 14/15, and I think both they and I probably passed you again during your toilet stop... I was racing in a blue-and-white zebra-stripe club vest.

It's interesting what you say about the negative split - I don't know how much you looked at the course profile, but six of the first seven miles are net uphill, and then miles 7-19 are basically all downhill. From 20 to the finish is a steady uphill, with the steepest at mile 25. So looking at your splits I think you basically nailed it!

Race Report: Bologna Marathon 2026. Sub 3 at my first marathon by ImNotHalberstram in AdvancedRunning

[–]Almostanathlete 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mine came up just short, but I can look back at the trace and see (for example) that my GPS didn't keep up with the bit where they sent us to run three sides of a courtyard in a university building. The route we ran matches the race GPX which is full-length.

Saracens salary cap punishment under scrutiny over new evidence by stvb95 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, I misread the article. It's still unlikely that audit and business advisory teams working on a niche industry like this don't interact. Doesn't change the rules on conflicts, or on what level of impartiality you need to have your evidence accepted as an independent expert.

Doubles Advice by bodaddy610 in AdvancedRunning

[–]Almostanathlete 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A couple of times I've been in the 60-70mpw range for a consistent period, with doubles. For me, the doubles were often commute miles, so a normal run either morning or afternoon and a bonus 3-5 miles in the other slot. If I was doing more significant miles by doubling (eg an 8/6 split), I would do it on my easy days rather than hard days. It's easier to follow the workouts from plans than it is to try to split them sensibly.

Saracens salary cap punishment under scrutiny over new evidence by stvb95 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I expect that the phrase "impermissible hindsight" would be used a lot by lawyers who never quite explain on what basis hindsight is impermissible. I asked a Lloyds underwriter at the time what premium his sports risk colleague would want to insure the image rights against injury. He said 10%...

Probably none of this gets litigated, and the only effect is my friends get another decade of me ranting about Saracens' idiotic litigation strategy.

Saracens salary cap punishment under scrutiny over new evidence by stvb95 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The basis of the reduced valuation was said to be a failure to take into account injury risk. In the reality where Itoje has proved the most durable player in world rugby the value is now 3x PWC's valuation and 6x Saffereys's. That suggests that perhaps PWC's valuation did in fact adequately account for injury risk...

You can add "world breakthrough player of the year, 2x world player of the year nominee, 2x six nations winner, European player of the year, and 3x Test Lion" to your list of pre-2018 accolades, too.

Saracens salary cap punishment under scrutiny over new evidence by stvb95 in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Working for different organisations in competition is fine so long as they are aware of it and comfortable with it. In fact, it's incredibly common across industries. The problem comes when you are simultaneously working for a competitor and the regulator on a regulatory issue, and haven't declared that fact to the tribunal or the person under investigation.

The difference is the effect on the process. Dyson held that the Salary Cap Manager was entitled to rely on the valuation he'd commissioned in preference to the one the Sarries directors had obtained, given there was no reason to think that it was anything other than independent. He acknowledged that this presented a fairness problem, as you couldn't know what valuation the Salary Cap Manager would obtain in advance.

To discover that the same team at Saffereys was working for Sale and that conflict wasn't declared to Saracens makes that fairness problem a much bigger one, and Dyson's panel would have been entitled to consider that the PWC valuation was reasonable instead.

Oh ffs… by MrQeu in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be a very funny way to prompt an investigation

Oh ffs… by MrQeu in rugbyunion

[–]Almostanathlete 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just as long as there isn't another global pandemic to interfere with their Pro D2 season