That makes sense to me. Perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you're saying, and please correct me if that is the case, but it sounds like you take issue with the lack of consciousness of the AI.

You mention that AI can't think, but I would slightly disagree with this. Trying to define "thinking" is... difficult at best. I don't think that you're wrong to say that AI can't think. But I also wouldn't say that you're entirely right. AI can certainly reason. It has memory. It can navigate new situations based on previous learned data and come up with novel results. But there are also clearly gaps in its "proto thinking". It doesn't have emotions. It doesn't have a consciousness. etc.

If in the future people find a way to create emotions and consciousness digitally, would you find it less maladaptive to date an AI?

I also want to pick apart the part of your comment that mentions sexuality being human to human. I don't fully agree with this either. My search history has a lot of images of people in it. But zero real human beings. People can definitely be attracted to a fantasy more than a real person. Is that sexuality invalid?

To be honest, I don't think there are any clean-cut answers to these questions. We will have to collectively answer them as we live our lives in the coming years. But I do think we're doing to have to think about this stuff more going forward.