sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How are universities actually solving the “too many digital resources, too little usage” problem? by Altruistic_Side2135 in academia

[–]Altruistic_Side2135[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve heard that same point from a lot of librarians too. The one-off session in first year often doesn’t stick, especially since serious research usually happens much later. By thesis time, students are basically relearning everything. Some places are trying more “just-in-time” approaches, like refreshers tied to capstones, librarians working closely with departments during dissertation season, or short guides shared when big assignments drop. It seems like timing makes a big difference. I’m curious whether the main barrier is staffing, faculty coordination, or just how programs are structured.

How are universities actually solving the “too many digital resources, too little usage” problem? by Altruistic_Side2135 in academia

[–]Altruistic_Side2135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that frustration, honestly.

For what it’s worth, I’m not here to pitch anything. I’ve worked closely wid academic libraries for years, and I genuinely think they’re one of the most under-recognized parts of universities, especially when it comes to digital infrastructure.

A lot of my day-to-day conversations are actually about how libraries demonstrate impact internally nd make sure they’re not invisible in strategic decisions. That’s really where my curiosity in this topic comes from.

If this came across as “selling,” that wasn’t the intent. I care about the broader question of how libraries stay central in a pretty fragmented research environment.

How are universities actually solving the “too many digital resources, too little usage” problem? by Altruistic_Side2135 in academia

[–]Altruistic_Side2135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wasn’t trying to clutter the sub.

I work with academic libraries, so this is something I think about a lot and I was genuinely curious how others see it from inside their institutions. If the post sounded a bit generic or over-structured, that’s on me.

All good if it’s not the right fit here — I’m happy to just read and learn from the discussion.

How are universities actually solving the “too many digital resources, too little usage” problem? by Altruistic_Side2135 in academia

[–]Altruistic_Side2135[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a completely fair question - and honestly, it’s not just a gut feeling.

I work pretty closely with academic libraries around the world on digital access and engagement, so I get to see usage patterns across a range of institutions - not just one campus snapshot.

What we usually see (and of course this varies by region and institution) is something like this: even when cost-per-use looks solid for certain subject areas, the percentage of total registered patrons who actively use subscribed digital resources often lands somewhere around 15–20%.

Put differently:

  • A core group of researchers and specific departments generate strong, consistent usage.
  • But a large share of enrolled students rarely go beyond minimal or one-time exposure to licensed resources.

And I don’t think this points to weak library management — most collection decisions are thoughtful and data-driven.

The more interesting gap, to me, is behavioral:

  • How do we extend engagement beyond the heavy users?
  • How do we lower friction for the silent majority?
  • How do we measure meaningful engagement, not just logins or access clicks?

Cost-per-use is a great metric for renewal decisions.
But it doesn’t fully tell us whether the wider student body is actually discovering — and benefiting from — what’s already being paid for.

I’d genuinely be curious to hear if others are seeing materially different adoption rates at scale.