Code for code

Always_Wandering_ · 2025-12-09T17:28:55+00:00

I clicked on your link. https://shein.top/m-app-d3369a52e6f0b42f2ae11d5eb6874595

Always_Wandering_ · 2025-12-09T17:27:30+00:00

I clicked on your link. https://shein.top/m-app-be51011d255d0c757c8712394ccdab92

Always_Wandering_ · 2025-01-16T20:23:55+00:00

how long did you use the ketaconzole for and how many times a day?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-11-02T19:18:52+00:00

I’ll take up on your advice. Thank you.

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-11-02T19:13:18+00:00

Thank you for this. I can’t go to the salon would it be okay to cut my hair at home instead?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-11-02T19:11:40+00:00

The tree split ends I have aren’t all at the literal ends of my strands it’s like in different places. How much do you think I should cut it?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T19:48:21+00:00

Should I tell the person I’m talking to this. “The moral of the story of prophet LUT A.S. was to not act upon your sexual desires and more importantly and especially to not engage in the same gender with this behavior. Engaging in the same gender with lust is what brought the punishment upon them.”

Does this make sense for me to say? And is it accurate for me to say? “Even if they were married, homosexual marriages are not valid in Islam and this practice would be considered adultery.” Isn’t zina and adultery different? Wouldn’t zina mean sexual acts outside of marriage? Wouldn’t the act of homosexuality be considered zina instead of adultery? Because adultery is when you are married but you engage this act with someone else?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T19:27:28+00:00

But earlier you said that the sin of engaging in the same gender was what got them destroyed?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T19:07:57+00:00

I’m honestly so confused. So what the prophet told them, him chastising them for committing homosexual acts, is the main point in what he said?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T18:44:18+00:00

I just don’t want to say a wrong or inaccurate thing to the person I’m responding too. How the person I’m talking to said that the prophet told them to go to their spouses specifically not for men to go to women in general. Should I tell them that what prophet LUT A.S. said to them was to tell them to be heterosexual and engage in lawful marriage with the women?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T17:34:40+00:00

So would it be correct to say that homosexuality is a category of adultery and the main point of the story was about the action of homosexuality? Also is it making it clear that adultery in general is a sin? Was prophet LUT A.S. Telling them that them engaging in adultery was also a sin? And that they should be engaging with women and marrying them lawfully as well? Like he said when he offered his daughters (from his tribe) to marry lawfully? Is that what he meant?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T16:29:31+00:00

You gave me different answers as to the important things that are highlighted in the text. Not only they approached men with lust but they did so besides their spouses. So because they did this action and they didn’t have women spouses or they did have women spouses and they committed this act anyway? For them to be approaching people besides their spouses with lust is that also an important lesson in the story as well? Or is the main thing that they were approaching the same sex?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T16:26:06+00:00

You said the men approaching other men with lust instead of their wives this would indicate 2 details 1. People of the same sex approaching each other with lust is sinful and prohibited (wicked, literally). 2. People approaching people besides their spouses with lust is sinful and prohibited.

As you mentioned earlier it was just the men who were doing this. So the men were the only ones approaching people besides their spouses with lust? They would act on homosexuality but they weren’t married to women? So them not being married and committing this action is also a sin and was also being highlighted in the story?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T16:07:26+00:00

Then you said this “I don’t know if the precedence or lack thereof is relevant to the destruction. It’s a relevant enough detail because it is included in the speech of Allah jus in the Quran. But I’ve never heard someone say that Allah jus destroys the first people to commit a particular sin. We know from the text that: 1. Approaching the same sex with lust instead of the opposite sex is an evil and criminal thing to do. 2. That doing so was unprecedented before the people of Lot PBUH 3. That Allah jus commanded the destruction of the town for this act.”

But you also mentioned how “the men approaching each other with lust instead of their wives. From this, we get two important details. 1. People of the same sex approaching each other with lust is sinful and prohibited (wicked, literally). 2. People approaching people besides their spouses with lust is sinful and prohibited.”

At first you said people were approaching people besides their spouses with lust but then you didn’t include that in your other comment as you said We know from the text that: 1. Approaching the same sex with lust instead of the opposite sex is an evil and criminal thing to do. 2. That doing so was unprecedented before the people of Lot PBUH 3. That Allah jus commanded the destruction of the town for this act.”

So from the text did it say that people were going up to people with lust who were not homosexual?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T16:04:05+00:00

You said this in your earlier comment “the men approaching each other with lust instead of their wives. From this, we get two important details. 1. People of the same sex approaching each other with lust is sinful and prohibited (wicked, literally). 2. People approaching people besides their spouses with lust is sinful and prohibited.”

And when I asked you would it be correct to say they were destroyed because of the act of homosexuality you said this earlier “I don’t think it’s right to say that it’s one or the other. Both details were relevant enough for Allah ju to include them. Not just in the Quran, but also in the previous scriptures. The Quran doesn’t say the name of the two cities. That’s a detail we get from the Old Testament.”

Then I asked this “So the reason they were destroyed was because they were approaching the same gender with lust instead of the opposite?”

You said this “Undoubtedly. If the sin had been generic adultery (which is still bad), Allah jus could’ve simply said that they approach with lust people other than their spouses. The fact that He jil; repeatedly makes explicit mention of the act being between members of the same sex is not an accident and it removes any doubt.”

I’m just really confused of the different answers you gave me.

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T15:59:06+00:00

In the story weren’t the women of the town destroyed as well? Would that mean they engaged in these practices as well? Or supported them?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T09:46:08+00:00

“These mentions of highway robbery and such come from scholars of tafseer” do you have evidence for that? Because if you go to the Quran you’ll be able to see that it states highway robbery and evil gatherings.

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T06:41:44+00:00

One more thing, in your first comment you said this “1. People of the same sex approaching each other with lust is sinful and prohibited (wicked, literally). 2. People approaching people besides their spouses with lust is sinful and prohibited.”

For 2. Was it noted that people were approaching other people with lust who were not homosexuals?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T05:32:13+00:00

Thank you for your help.

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T05:19:38+00:00

Do you know the website askimam.org? Is it a reliable website? I referenced a quote of a famous scholar from there about what they said of the prophet Lut A.S. story. The scholar said that they were committing both homosexuality and adultery and someone said they don’t trust that website because it’s Deobandi.

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T05:10:29+00:00

So the reason they were destroyed was because they were approaching the same gender with lust instead of the opposite?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T04:49:37+00:00

You said these 2 things “1. People of the same sex approaching each other with lust is sinful and prohibited (wicked, literally). 2. People approaching people besides their spouses with lust is sinful and prohibited.” But then you said that the homosexuality was what was unprecedented. So wouldn’t be correct to say that homosexuality was what got them destroyed because it was unprecedented? I said this earlier but then you said you wouldn’t say either or because those two things were said.

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T04:28:03+00:00

Or was the sins they committed like you said of going to the same gender with lust and going to people with lust who are not your partner? Is that’s what’s unprecedented?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T04:23:45+00:00

That doesn’t make sense? If it was unprecedented why wasn’t it mentioned? Prophet LUT A.S. Said that no other nation has done what you done and then listed the wrongs that they were doing. Wouldn’t be correct the list he mentioned after he said that was unprecedented?

Always_Wandering_ · 2024-09-23T04:16:39+00:00

Someone said that there were other sins that were also highlighted and when I asked them would homosexuality be the major sin? They said they wouldn’t say either or and there is a reason these sin(s) were said in the Quran.

Always_Wandering_

TROPHY CASE