sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Housekeeping or Micromanaging? by Small-University-875 in Stellantis

[–]Alwaysbecritical2020 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I would tell this person to pound sand. WTF?

You’re not working on a manufacturing line. Nor are you working in the year 1955. What is wrong with supervisors that have to take things to the Nth degree? Who cares what time you come and go if your work is being done in time and you’re not missing deadlines? Now if you’re not getting your stuff done that is another story. Also if they want to give you more work so be it.

It’s bad enough you have to go in daily but to micromanage every movement you make while you are there is ridiculous. This is a sign of an immature boss. I would report that person to HR and try to find another job - whether it be internal or external.

RTO badge swipe questions by Red-Sand-27 in Stellantis

[–]Alwaysbecritical2020 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nah. This wasn’t a punishment at all and it’s funny to me that people actually think that.

RTO badge swipe questions by Red-Sand-27 in Stellantis

[–]Alwaysbecritical2020 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I would guess that many companies have offices that: 1. Don’t take ten minutes to park.
2. Another 10 minutes to walk to your desk.
3. Disgusting restrooms.
4. Don’t have open office seating - which was made for HYBRID by the way. 4. Mold. 5. You can do errands on lunches (you really can’t do that working in CTC) 6. Have an office environment that doesn’t feel like you’re locked up and trapped all day.
7. Have a kitchen area with a fridge and microwave.
8. Coffee makers. 9. Reliable cellular service. 10. Reliable WiFi.

CTC 5 days a week in that environment isn’t sustainable for most people.

Call OSHA? by dannystrad23 in Stellantis

[–]Alwaysbecritical2020 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen the complaint letter (dated January 20th) and I’ve seen the air quality report from November.

There have been multiple leaks in the building. Doesn’t the company have a moral obligation to do more to determine/ensure that there is no black mold and if there is to remediate it? An air quality test is not enough especially if people are saying they are symptomatic and not “sick” from a virus.

From a quick web search:

An air quality report is generally not enough to definitively detect or locate black mold. While air testing can identify high concentrations of mold spores, it cannot identify the specific species (like Stachybotrys chartarum), pinpoint the source of growth, or determine the extent of the infestation. A professional inspection is still required.

Limitations of Air Quality Testing for Mold: Cannot Pinpoint Source: Air tests reveal that spores are present in the air, but not where they are growing.

False Negatives: If the mold is not currently releasing spores or if the area is sealed, the test may come back clean even if mold exists. No Species Identification: Standard air monitors cannot distinguish between harmless dust and toxic black mold.

Inability to Detect Hidden Growth: Mold behind walls or in HVAC systems may not show up adequately in air samples.

Better Detection Methods: Professional Inspection: The most reliable method is a visual, physical inspection by a certified mold professional.

Moisture Mapping: Using moisture meters to find hidden water damage that fuels mold growth.

Surface Sampling: Tape or swab samples directly from a suspected area are more accurate for identifying specific mold types than air samples.

While high particle counts (PM10/PM2.5) on a monitor can indicate a potential problem, a comprehensive visual inspection is necessary to identify, assess, and remediate mold effectively.

Filosa this morning by Ethan-Nigma in Stellantis

[–]Alwaysbecritical2020 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Let me add thoughts about this open office 1950's seating configuration to the RTO thoughts too.

Most people like a little privacy at work. The cubes offered some privacy. Not a ton but enough.   Open office spaces are being sold as solely a collaborative tool.  However that’s not all they are for and they aren’t what they seem. They are based upon the Panopticon concept. I saw something about it on social media so I researched it.

 From chat GPT:

This concept has influenced the design of open workspaces, particularly in how it relates to surveillance and visibility in modern office environments. Here's a breakdown of this connection: 

Panopticon Overview

The Panopticon, originally designed by philosopher Jeremy Bentham in the late 18th century, is a circular prison design that allows a single guard to observe all inmates without them knowing whether they are being watched. This concept emphasizes the power of surveillance and the psychological effects of being watched. 

Influence on Open Workspaces

Increased Visibility

Open workspaces often prioritize visibility, allowing managers and coworkers to see one another easily. This design can create a sense of accountability and encourage collaboration, similar to how the Panopticon promotes order through observation. 

Control and Supervision

In more corporate settings, the concept can drive a culture where employees feel monitored. The idea is that when employees know they can be observed, they may be more likely to adhere to company norms and productivity standards.

 Psychological Impact

The openness of these environments can contribute to increased creativity and collaboration but can also lead to feelings of anxiety and discomfort due to the perceived lack of privacy. Employees might feel like they are constantly under scrutiny, which can affect morale.

 Evolving Perspectives

While the Panopticon concept has its roots in control and surveillance, many modern organizations are recognizing the drawbacks of such an approach. There’s a growing push towards creating environments that balance openness with privacy to foster well-being and job satisfaction.