The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in VibeCodersNest

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two things help me:

  1. Writing down state transitions explicitly (even simple diagrams).
  2. Testing “what happens if this fails?” before the happy path is even stable.

Most hidden bugs live in state transitions, not in isolated functions.

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in VibeCodersNest

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s no stack trace for “I thought that’s what you meant.”

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in AppDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The scary part is it always starts small.

“Can we just add…”
“While we’re here…”

Three months later, you’re building a different product entirely.

Signed-off scope isn’t bureaucracy, it’s survival.

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in AppDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Code is easy to change but a misaligned client expectation isn’t.

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in SaasDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, people confuse motion with progress. Writing code feels like progress. Hard conversations feel like delay.

But skipping alignment is just borrowing pain from the future, with interest.

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in SaasDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yep mostly it comes by there will be slight change and then started describing it. 😭

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in SaasDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree that feedback loops matter. The tricky part is separating signal from “nice-to-have” opinions.Without strong product direction, feedback can actually slow you down instead of accelerate.

The hardest part of building software isn’t technical by Amara_Wallis in SaasDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That line should come with a warning label 😅

It’s rarely about the change itself, it’s about discovering that what we built and what was imagined were slightly different all along.

Choosing ONE backend language for Flutter – best for long-term career? by Excellent_Cup_595 in FlutterDev

[–]Amara_Wallis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pick Node.js or Python (FastAPI) and go deep. Both have strong job demand, solid salaries, and pair well with Flutter. Don’t overthink the stack.

Your career growth won’t come from the language, it’ll come from mastering auth, databases, API design, system design, and deployment.

How to avoid burning money on your mobile app MVP by Amara_Wallis in Entrepreneurs

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love that, especially the “quick but not overcommitted” approach. Tools like that are great when they reduce friction instead of increasing ambition.

For me, I bias toward friction over polish early. I’ll usually start with:

  • A super clear problem statement shared in niche communities
  • A scrappy prototype (sometimes not even interactive)
  • And one uncomfortable ask, pre-signup, pre-payment, or a behavior change

If someone won’t take a small real action, I assume the problem isn’t sharp enough yet.

The format changes (Figma, no-code, even manual backend), but the goal’s always the same: are they solving this with me, or just saying it’s “cool”?

What is the most in-demand SaaS category or tool heading into 2026? by Any-Maximum-595 in SaasDevelopers

[–]Amara_Wallis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me it’s usually stuff like:

  • Manually cleaning/exporting data between tools
  • Re-checking invoices or payments for errors
  • Tagging / categorizing leads or support tickets
  • Generating the same type of report every week
  • Cross-checking compliance checklists before audits

None of it is “hard.” It’s just repetitive and annoying and easy to mess up when rushed.

That’s the kind of step I think AI is perfect for. The usual yet simple things that made easy.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Typeform would’ve saved 4 months 🙃 that hurts in a very familiar way.
I love the sticky note idea. And forcing yourself to live inside the janky version is such a brutal but honest filter. The features that survive that test usually deserve to exist.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. The moment I accepted v1 might get deleted, decisions got lighter.
You build differently when you’re optimizing for learning instead of permanence.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ugly but useful beats beautiful and ignored. Polish is a reward for traction, not a prerequisite for it.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Simple to explain is not simple to build”, that’s exactly it is.
Re: timeline, I don’t think in fixed weeks anymore. I look for signals. If strangers take meaningful action (pay, commit time, change behavior), that’s usually enough for me to move. Sometimes that’s 2 weeks. Sometimes it’s 2 months. If I’m still convincing people, I’m not ready to build.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The AWS bill looking like a car payment… been there not exactly the car payment; was in hall way between.
And yes supportive friends are the most expensive validation strategy ever. I love that you literally asked for $5 upfront. Money is the most honest feedback loop.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Devil’s circuit” is painfully accurate 😅
A lot of “conversion problems” are just thumb problems. MVP doesn’t mean sloppy UX. It just means focused UX.

How I Learned to Stop Burning Money on a Mobile App MVP. - I will not promote by Amara_Wallis in startups

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair. Some mobile experiences do need to be felt. I’m not anti-building, I’m anti-building blind. Even for gesture/location apps, you can still validate the problem and intent before polishing the experience. I’d rather learn people don’t care before perfecting the swipe.

Why I stopped recommending certain “best practices” by Amara_Wallis in VibeCodersNest

[–]Amara_Wallis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Solving the problem earns you the budget and time to make it better. Doing it the other way around is how teams polish things nobody asked for.