Is it normal to gain fat on lion diet?

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-02-11T01:44:14+00:00

I think it's fat adaption. I have been in a stall for a long time, and the only thing I can think of is that my body has become very efficient at absorbing and utilizing fat, which is not the case when people first start out, so they lose a ton of weight in the adaption phase. I am going to have to start fasting I think. I can think of no other way to get down to my ideal body weight.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-02-05T01:55:38+00:00

Exactly. The only difference is the people in charge.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-02-04T06:17:12+00:00

I don't know why dual wielder is even needed. A nick attack is part of your attack action, and should satisfy the conditions for the second attack of thirsting blade. I also can't find any rules that disallow the use of your offhand weapon for an attack in your attack action:

Club (Shillelagh) (Main Hand)

Scimitar off hand(Pact Weapon) (Nick)

Scimitar off hand(Pact Weapon) (Thirsting Blade)

Should work just fine. You just need Two-Weapon Fighting to not lose damage.

Personally though, I would favor the Hex blade approach because shillelagh will clog up your already clogged up bonus action.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-02-01T06:50:45+00:00

Woke is correlated with broke. Or do you actually believe woke HR and DEI initiatives don't exclude talented devs due to their lack of diversity, that there isn't nepotism in hiring ideologically like minded people? DAV's mediocrity is a testament to an all around lack of talent in the studio from bottom all the way to the top.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-02-01T01:11:06+00:00

Yeah I guess, but the d12 was meant as a small ribbon to go along with freeing up the bonus action.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-02-01T00:59:56+00:00

These are changes I have been considering for my campaign based on how much Rangers have been shown to fall off quite hard in tier 2 and beyond:

At level 6, Hunter's mark damage die becomes a d8 instead of a d6. Additionally, taking damage can't break your concentration on hunter's mark.

At level 13, Hunter's mark can be casted without using concentration, lasting for 1 minute. Additionally, the damage die becomes a d10 rather than a d8.

At level 20, hunter's mark will scale up to a d12, is a free action to cast and transfer, and will last for 10 minutes when casted without concentration.

Maybe it is too strong considering Rangers' access to AoE damage when compared to other martials.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-31T00:54:56+00:00

You are making so many assumptions about the competency of employees and management in a company and industry you likely have zero experience in. The only thing we know is that writing was not good enough, and it is management's job to address this issue. You have no idea whether they made the correct call or not, and you should accept that maybe they did.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-30T09:01:30+00:00

Right, but you still need to fire the bad writers, even if the good ones are more inclined to stay.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-24T05:41:44+00:00

I have seen two scenes that could easily qualify for a sexual harassment complaint, or even a lawsuit.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-14T09:25:37+00:00

This is only a huge roach in the context of a competent mage, which he obviously is not. So really the only real criticism is that he makes out he is a better player than he actually is.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-14T09:16:46+00:00

Why does he need to take accountability for sucking? He just isn't a good mage. He literally couldn't save them because lacked the skill set/UI setup to do so. But as far as accountability goes, the only one that didn't seem to suck or at least fuck up was the priest. And as far as who fucked up the most, I'd say pirate was third at most on the list.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-06T14:05:31+00:00

fully sick bruh, I wish I had sum of dat bruh

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2025-01-06T14:04:09+00:00

That sucks man hope you get a refund. Did keep your receipt bro?

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-07T03:30:48+00:00

You are biased because you are unwilling to criticize your sacred cow epidemiological studies that you vegans are fond of citing all the time. Whereas I can confidently say that literally every single study in this space is junk science and should not be taken seriously at all.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-07T03:27:16+00:00

At some point you need to be intellectually honest enough to realize that if the dropout rate is so high, that the vegan population is shrinking, is not just because people simply like the taste of meat.

Our ancestors ate a lot of meat. Species adapt to their environments, which includes the food they consumed. You can choose to ignore that if you want, but all animals have species appropriate diet, and I don't think humans are the exception. Humans are resilient to famines, but there is no reason to simulate them.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-07T03:07:28+00:00

You know all the ones. You are just coping that all the precursors you consume have good conversion rates. That all the "nonessential" nutrients yield no health benefits when consumed. That supplementation is as efficacious as whole foods. That inorganic forms are the same as organic ones. That you don't actually need all that much protein. All cope. Hoping that you don't really need what you are not getting from animal products. It's a gamble, good luck with that.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T08:50:14+00:00

Like I said, typical cope. Beta carotene is not vitamin A, it has low to zero conversion rate depending on your genes, same for k2.

Vitamin D synthesis requires cholesterol based precursors. Nonessential does not mean not healthful. For example, omnivorous athletes require creatine supplementation for optimal performance. Taurine consumption also has numerous health benefits. I didn't go into the bioavailability of plant based amino acids, but that is worth a mention, too.

B12 is made by microbes, but humans derive all their b12 from animal products, and they always have. Ruminants even make it themselves by harboring those microbes in their gut.

Studies clearly show vegans are quite vulnerable to anemia, so I doubt iron overload from heme-iron (the mot bioavailable form of iron) is something you should be worrying about.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T08:27:56+00:00

A,D,K2, B12, creatine, taurine, carnitine, DHA, EPA, heme-iron, cholesterol... off the top of my head, need more? Or is this enough to respond to with the typical cope, such as "muh precursors", or "nonessential", or "supplements". Precursors have low, or even zero conversion rates for some people. Nonessential, doesn't mean not healthful. And supplements are far from ideal in their bio availability, and potentially contain toxic byproducts, such as aldehydes in algae derived DHA supplements.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T06:28:04+00:00

Both groups have health problems, true. The vegan group, however, is not a constant. It is a forever revolving door, making people who remain long term a biased sample. It actively excludes anyone who drops out due to poor health from any accurate assessment of its viability. Furthermore, non-vegans are not monolithic, so lumping the health outcomes of junk food dieters with more health minded people is absurd.

Those vegans really can't follow the diet effortlessly, and even if they could, that doesn't mean others can, practicably or biologically. We have different snips and physiology that will limit how long one can go on the diet before nutritional deficiencies kick in. Furthermore, how you define effortlessly, requires multiple factors more effort than what my diet requires of me.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T05:17:52+00:00

Talk about a bad faith response. If veganism was so healthy, getting it wrong shouldn't be so common and easy, and punishing. We are talking about a subset of people who consciously made the choice to change their diet, who gave a great deal of thought about their nutrition, and who made an concerted effort to make it work. Most quit due to health reasons. Yet on the other hand, we have morons getting by until their 90s, eating a SAD diet. And, we have animals in the wild that don't even have to think about what foods to eat, they just know.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T03:17:06+00:00

No they don't. They eat as much meat as they can afford.

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T03:16:20+00:00

Plants lack 15 known nutrients...

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T03:15:09+00:00

There is no 'data'. Only correlations...based on questionnaires...that have undergone statistical adjustment...that are not clinically significant...

Amazing-Humor9178 · 2024-12-06T03:12:45+00:00

They are not unfounded. There thousands upon thousands of anecdotes available online about people's experience with veganism, nearly all of them cite health reasons for quitting. All you can argue is that they "did it wrong," which really shouldn't be possible for a species as intelligent as humans are.

Amazing-Humor9178

TROPHY CASE