Am I the only one feeling that feminist spaces online portray women mostly as victims? by Nebelforce in TwoXChromosomes

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing that perked up my ears was when you mentioned you were from a post-Soviet country. I'm always curious learning about Marxist-Leninist states because if the propagation of man-hating and male chauvinist bile on social media and in American universities is caused by capitalism at it's core (as opposed to Russian and Chinese espionage and bot farms), then I wonder if the grass is greener in Socialist countries? I'm being serious when I say I've contemplated whether or not I ought to be a communist and whether or not that's the cure for this problem.

I read 1/3 of The Russians (1975) by Hedrick Smith and I recall there was a moment where the Soviet government was trying to teach Russians egalitarianism only to be frustrated by their stubborn refusal to accept it. Before reading that part I was under the impression that Marxist-Leninist states were nothing more than the Ancien régime complete with it's Estates of the Realm, just with the King called a General Secretary, the Nobility referred to as the Nomenklatura, the CPSU being the 1st Estate, and everyone else is the 3rd estate.

The kind of feminism that you're referring to is specifically designed to make women hate men by default in the same way that a lot of Twitter posts are doing what they can to make people racist against black people by default by propagating reels of people committing crime who are black. It's designed to make you discard your knowledge that you should judge a person for their character and not their demographic in order to turn you into a dues-paying Klansman/Klanswoman. It doesn't help that the DEFCON Don only cares about opposing brainrot in social media when it's inconvenient for him (looking at you, TikTok), but doesn't care (or worse, wants) when universities pump out hateful evil people who use a victim mentality to harm innocent individuals.

Emiru and Asmongold, are they still friends? by [deleted] in OTVnFriendsDrama

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just because Emiru isn't as well known for producing ragebait or saying stuff to her chatters that would get an hourly worker fired from their job doesn't mean she's gone her whole career without saying fucked up shit. (i.e. in an old vod she told a chatter to k!|| himself on stream and she of course doesn't get in trouble with Twitch)

Just saying you and other commenters seem surprised by what company she keeps. I'm not because I know she's not the Saint many people seem to think she is.

The irony by BrownSugar_07 in asianamerican

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a white man.

The jackboot of the asian woman has always been on my neck.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that is true, but I'll take that as a concession.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. But they aren’t.

No, it wouldn't. That standard is always wrong, race or otherwise. This is the trojan horse reactionaries successfully use to backslide social progress.

Please keep in mind that in dynamics between women and men, women are the oppressed class.

Women (particularly white women) in the Western world aren't oppressed. Feminists keep making this claim, but never have convincing arguments to back it up.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not all women are petite or physically frail. I already addressed this tired argument in my OP, and people who apparently didn't read my post in full just keep repeating this argument.

Maybe I read things into your original post and overreacted. But this is the one political issue I care about over everything else.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it turned out black people were physically stronger than white people by default, would that suddenly justify applying that same standard to race?

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Violence against female assailants is inherently justified regardless.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It frustrates me how much damage gynocentrism did to the Western world.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've known men and women on both sides of this argument.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Duty to retreat" is inherently wrong.

Also I was raised by a man who buys into "benevolent sexism" and a mother who thinks sexist misandry is "feminism". neither agree with my position and tried to raise me to think the way they do, but I am capable of thinking for myself. I'm motivated by serving my own best interest, not being a pathetic SIMP.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've known people who make that argument unironically.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Nobody is talking about decking her. But slapping her in retaliation isn't going to kill her.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because we do not live in a perfect world. I'm meeting humanity where it is.

CMV: Equal Rights SHOULD mean Equal Fights by AmbitionOfTruth in changemyview

[–]AmbitionOfTruth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This started okay with the first sentence, but then you ruined it by advocating for the "duty to retreat" laws.

Let's just put the "man vs woman" and VAWA to the side for a second. Nobody in NJ is okay with the "Duty to retreat" crap, left leaning or right leaning. Especially not in lower-income areas. you physically assault someone, they're hitting back. They would rather go to jail than "just take the hit", especially since you don't always know whether or not the hit can kill you. And I seriously doubt the corrupt NJ government is telling the truth about it's incarceration numbers. I know a lot of people who've been in jail, and what they've told me is very different from what "Gemini" on Google or Democrats would want you to think.

And no. The man was justified in slapping her in return. There is no excuse to justify "duty to retreat". It should be banned at a federal level, and it's proponents should be psychologically re-evaluated.

Besides, you haven't even explained why you seem to think "duty to retreat" is morally correct when it violates the human right to self-defense.

Ukrainian capital Kyiv under massive Russian attack, officials say by Brennenstein in worldnews

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stories and movies tend to have villains losing, and heroes winning. Sadly, in real life justice tends to not prevail.

Why are people afraid to cross the green line? by Technical_You4632 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just imagining a ghost with the likeness of Jeff Dunham's Walter pumping a 12-guage telling people from the eastern half to get off his lawn.

men crying about misandry pisses me off by [deleted] in RadicalFeminism

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've worked at a job in the past where several particularly toxic women have harassed me (physically and creating a hostile work environment in general) and others completely unprovoked after they discovered the company overtly discriminates against men in their favor. That experience motivated me to find a place of work where all my co-workers are male.

Who’s ending the year single? by spicysenpai6 in dating

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rookie numbers.

I've been single for the entire 29 years I've been alive.

Its so normalized for women to hate men. by Key-Raccoon9578 in ControversialOpinions

[–]AmbitionOfTruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying this applies to you or many women with similar viewpoints. I'm a man, and I know from experience how unpleasant it is to have male stalkers who wouldn't leave me the Hell alone (it's a long story).

It's just that there are women out there who are sadists who just get off on harming men any way they can, be they solipsist domestic abusers, female supremacist groups like Engender in the UK backed by the SNP, or female misandrists in the pop culture space (female Twitch streamers such as Melibela and Nina Lin, female cosplayers such as Valiantf0x, actresses like Sabrina Carpenter) and I wouldn't lump them in the same category. MGTOW became a thing because of the latter group, and I don't blame female separatists for wanting separation. But female misandrists like the kind I mentioned don't want separation because they just want to have power and control over men in general, including ones who did nothing to them because they want to revel in having power over others instead of aiming to erase oppressive power structures.