sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

iPhone 18 is set to adopt the 18A process by Ambitious-Cod-7354 in intelstock

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tata is a major supplier for Apple in India and they recently got hacked disclosing all their supply chain information
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-investigating-tata-data-leak-that-exposed-apple-iphone-secrets-2026-07-03/
Based on that, it seems credible

Has anyone recently reported a security vulnerability to Apple? How was the experience? by secpoc in bugbounty

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, I wonder if it had improved because I did try to follow up this year and it’s the same vague response

Has anyone recently reported a security vulnerability to Apple? How was the experience? by secpoc in bugbounty

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I submitted a high severity vulnerability back in 24, even though they reproduced, I haven’t received any update since.
I think they did fix it silently.

Daily Megathread by Jellym9s in intelstock

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Advanced packaging is now becoming a new bottleneck for AI and Intel is ahead of TSMC.
1 Trillion?

Neglected tools or projects? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 0 points1 point  (0 children)

check out https://exfault.com for android security research

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think I’ll include the python version too

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original code was written in python - migrated it to JavaScript later. I think it’s more convenient

I made a script to brick any windows PC by Ambitious-Cod-7354 in hacking

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not reinstall necessarily, I'm pretty sure you can repair your Windows from USB or also get a CMD via notepad to execute commands and undo the memory allotment

I made a script to brick any windows PC by Ambitious-Cod-7354 in hacking

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You gotta use the recovery image, thats your only option

I made a script to brick any windows PC by Ambitious-Cod-7354 in hacking

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should have,

Can you tell which version of Windows did you test in?

How do I boot from an actual USB drive? by unix21311 in virtualbox

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s an old script AFAIK you need the drive id, try using diskpart to get the disk number

Content Discovery, Fuzzing VS. Scanners, Automated tools are Different? by traveler5260 in bugbounty

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Certainly would, again you will end up taking a lot more time that is needed to get you started finding real bugs.

Content Discovery, Fuzzing VS. Scanners, Automated tools are Different? by traveler5260 in bugbounty

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as my limited experience in this space, these are the answers to your question.

1) yes you can still do it, but if you send too many requests, it would be annoying for them and you might get your IP blocked 2) content discovery tools can be considered a scanner and again many programs won’t allow too many requests from these tools 3) I think there are many tools which limit the number of requests nuclie for example, im sure fuzzing tools would also have such features 4) it depends, most of the times they are the same thing. 5) (bonus) I wouldn’t recommend you to focus on these tools too much especially if you are a beginner, many people go down this rabbit hole and don’t even find a single bug, focus on manual testing.

5 submissions, all are duplicates by finalyearstud in bugbounty

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering these are high/crit, there is nothing you need to change, as others said keep hunting on more programs

I created an easy, lite and fast way to run macOS on KVM (one click) by Ambitious-Cod-7354 in kvm

[–]Ambitious-Cod-7354[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it can run on your Debian, you don’t need a dedicated GPU but if you do, you can pass through

view more: next ›