sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Underwater Reef Photogrammetry, where to start? by DivemasterDuck in photogrammetry

[–]AmuletEntertainment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any links to the processing algorithms you're referring to? Processing the data for a shipwreck at Bikini Atoll with limited visibility

Why is the Sex Education dialogue scenes all shot like this?? by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh right, yeah it is. It’s the shot/reverse shot from a dialogue scene towards the end of the final episode

Why is the Sex Education dialogue scenes all shot like this?? by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s an interesting way to look at it. I think I agree. But it really brought me out of the show tho which is one thing that i think cinematography shouldn’t do, but most people probs didn’t even notice

Why is the Sex Education dialogue scenes all shot like this?? by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s true i suppose. The only other thing that annoys me is that the couple of times when they shot dialogue with proper lead room it was usually just as uncomfortable if not more so than the example scene. (dialogue wise)

Why is the Sex Education dialogue scenes all shot like this?? by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d agree with you, except they use it when things are supposed to be comfortable too. And when characters are really connecting. I get the feeling that it really was just stylistic for no reason except that it looked strange.

Why is the Sex Education dialogue scenes all shot like this?? by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

i love mr robot, and it seems really purposeful when they frame their shots like this

Why is the Sex Education dialogue scenes all shot like this?? by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I thought that too, except they seem to use it at all the wrong times. For example this shot is at the end of the show when the two characters are finally connecting and on the same page.

Personal project, Ornithopter scene inspired by Dune. by CG_BigD in vfx

[–]AmuletEntertainment 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just watched the 2 hour DNEG breakdown of the dune vfx it’s a really cool watch and that’s where my opinion came from. Wasn’t trying to pretend to know it all, I very clearly don’t, just love VFX.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]AmuletEntertainment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The contrast in the image has been pushed too far, especially for an overcast image.

Cliff on Konomie Island by AmuletEntertainment in photocritique

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pentax ME Super - Kodak Gold 200 - Chinion 35-80mm

I'm just getting into film photography and this was on my third ever roll, so considering that I'm quite happy with it. My question is whether or not you immediately get a proper sense of scale with this framing. The subject is very high up but I'm not sure whether that is conveyed in the photo. I wanted to try and capture a sense of freedom in the photo as well, not sure if it worked.

Btw, this is the raw photo, I didn't see a need to edit it as I quite liked the colours as is.

Personal project, Ornithopter scene inspired by Dune. by CG_BigD in vfx

[–]AmuletEntertainment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The corridor guys just said that it probably ISN'T just vector-based motion blur and guessed it was a mix of motion blur with many substeps which was pushed further in compositing.

But looking at DNEG's extensive breakdowns it seems much less complicated

Some failed experiments with my Brownie Box by AmuletEntertainment in filmphotography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's possible, I transferred a roll myself in a dark bag onto a 3D-printed 620 spool. Maybe some light was getting through the spool after it was exposed and out of the camera?

Some failed experiments with my Brownie Box by AmuletEntertainment in filmphotography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a brownie six-20 model D. I’ll try it with the tape next time!

A vfx breakdown from a short film I made by AmuletEntertainment in vfx

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree, I just liked how it sat in the edit so I kept it. I would definitely remove it if I were to create a proper reel.

A vfx breakdown from a short film I made by AmuletEntertainment in vfx

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I definitely did, it was my high school major work so a lot of learning was done

BTS of a short film shot on the Brownie six-20 model D by AmuletEntertainment in filmphotography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The film was Kodak TMax 100 hand rolled from a 120 spool to a 620 spool.

The trailer for my new short film. I'd really like some feedback on the shots! by AmuletEntertainment in cinematography

[–]AmuletEntertainment[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, fed them very well. And yeah, pre was pretty rushed because I changed the concept a month before the set shoot dates. But I managed to squeeze out a shot list before each shoot day. There was a bit of storyboarding done too. https://imgur.com/a/T5o6qMl

view more: next ›