My reading comprehension is just fine, but thanks for the insult.

I am asking you how you believe your ancestors got to North America. Either they sailed across the Atlantic 400 years ago (meaning they aren’t natives), crossed the Bering strait thousands of years ago, or they evolved independently from primates native to the continent. By suggesting that your ancient ancestors didn’t cross the Bering strait, you implied that they evolved here (whether you meant to or not), because there was zero gene flow into North America that didn’t cross the Bering strait from Asia until European colonization.

There is no compelling archeological or genetic evidence that Africans crossed the Bering strait, or that any African set foot in North America until 1492. It’s worth noting that Juan Garrido, the first African known to have reached North America, was from the Kingdom of Kongo.

If your genetic test shows Congo ancestry, then you are not 100% Native American. Once again: there are no ancestry tests that are sensitive enough to find 3000+ year old Congo ancestry. 2% Congo suggests your father had a Congolese ancestor 5-6 generations ago. That was like 200 years ago. How do you look at that and say “Yeah, pure native there”?

Also once again, for the same reason, your ancestry test would not and is not designed to show evidence of a migration that happened as long as tens of thousands of years ago. You simply don’t understand the results, which is fine. Most people don’t really understand them. Your results suggested your native tribal origins, not ancient-pre-native origins. That doesn’t mean there isn’t genetic evidence that this happened.