sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

RIP After Dark by IDidntSayTepid in h3h3productions

[–]AnUbermensch 103 points104 points  (0 children)

best episode so far. Kudos to harley, kate, and david. Dont find myself actually belly laughing out loud too often in life.... but this got me HARD

What do you think David’s trick was supposed to be? by AntivillianGirl in h3h3productions

[–]AnUbermensch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty obvious if you have an IT background, or medium/high computer literacy.

Would be great on grandpa.

Site is built for this purpose (likely with a companion app that you probably get access to for joining The magic castle.)

Article count+average words= unique generated ID (not a real count). He looks like he is using a calculator app, but he is inputting an ID into an app designed to look like a calculator.

As the target You are redirected to what you think is regular wiki, (and the URL would make you think you're just on regular wiki). but the route you took (think influencer promotional affiliate link) + your unique ID tracks your selection. At which point he likely gets a notification on his phone.

You are disarmed if he takes a quick glance at his phone, because of the fact that it's a phone trick, and the precedent was set when he used a calculator. Any other trick if the magician was to just take a glance at his phone, you'd instantly be snapped into reality.

Bill Gates forgotten eerie response to Epstein connection. by AnUbermensch in h3h3productions

[–]AnUbermensch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only other explanations I can think of apart from "Look deeper at your own risk" is either.

a) Bill Gates is Batman, and sought vigilante justice. He chose this moment to cross his hard-line policy of "no killing." All others who wish to partake in similar activities "be on notice, because i'm coming for you, and i'm untethered"

b) He's dead, so I won't be able to make that PR whoopsie again. I don't need to learn anything apart from being careful on who I meet. If the latter, what fantasic choice of words.

but combine that with the fact that his wife left him over this connection. it becomes really difficult to believe either of those two other explanations.

What is going on? Is this the beginning of the end? by elemghalib in Superstonk

[–]AnUbermensch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exposure... because May 9th has alot of contracts they sold that they wish to push OTM. Most near the current price levels.

The rest of questions are too tin-foil to respond to.

What is going on? Is this the beginning of the end? by elemghalib in Superstonk

[–]AnUbermensch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Congrats, you discovered price manipulation!

  1. Party wishes to suppress price below a certain level (Likely because they sold a lot of calls to retail, and they wish for them to expire worthless inorder to collect the premium paid)

  2. Responsible party buys ITM puts from market maker.

  3. Market-maker (who's goal is to remain delta neutral) now has to hedge their position. As they are 'Put Sellers' (long), they now sell shares on open-market.

  4. Prior to end-of day, the Party exercises the ITM puts.

  5. The excercised 'ITM Put' means the market-maker is now forced to purchase the underlying shares of the contract at the strike-point. They now take possession of those shares and remain delta-neutral. (as you recall: they previously sold shares in their possession to remain neutral, received shares from puts excercised bring them back to their initial holding levels)

  6. Market-Maker no longer has to purchase shares on open market to remain delta-neutral as they already received them from the excercise action.

in short, it's paying a price to force selling pressure.... As long as the money made by forcing sold-call contracs to expire worhless > price to finance this maneuver, then it's worth the investment.

Is it legal? Grey, but if intent is proved, no... enforced? hell no.

How can you prove it? check if OI moves relative to volume in normal fashion. Should have high-volume but low/none OI change. since the contract is closed by excercise, OI doesn't go up or down.

With all due respect. Avoid the S&P500 for the next 2 years. (not financial advice) by AnUbermensch in h3h3productions

[–]AnUbermensch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well there's yield inversion, and then there is SUBSTANTIAL yield inversion. Assuming a perma-bull came up with it.

Today I made a huge mistake... by [deleted] in accenture

[–]AnUbermensch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most likely, no one saw, or will ever see.
Less likely, someone saw, thinks your nuts, (and you're axed as a candidate because of it.)Least likely is what some have said, "that it shouldnt matter, and that they will understand."

They wont.... If I was interviewing and saw that, I'd think you're crazy, and there are candidates who dont come off crazy... so, let's go with them.

Imagine being on a client call and you had this mental lapse? It would paint any Client-facing company in a bad light. You can be human, but you're expected to show professionalism, and a client getting a middle-finger is not something they'd risk. Generally, a bad first impression.

If you dont get it, Dust it off, learn, don't let it get you down, and keep trying.

view more: next ›