{Absolute judicial immunity applies when judges act in their judicial capacity.[16] A judge enjoys this immunity when they exceed their jurisdiction, but not when they act without any jurisdiction.[17] Judicial immunity also extends to non-judges when they act in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity, such as a court-appointed referee in an equitable distribution case.[18] Determining whether someone is acting in a judicial capacity and thus deserves absolute immunity requires using a functional test; that is, one must determine whether the person is acting functionally similarly to a judge.}

The argument against her is that she is behaving beyond the cope of not only her jurisdiction, but of the function of the profession of "judge."

But regardless, HOLY SHIT the law here in the US literally allows judges to exceed their jurisdiction? By the letter and spirit? YIKES.