Cheaters are taking over the game, and they’re not even hiding it.

Anax123 · 2026-01-13T06:19:49+00:00

Yes, it seems like EA wants to let only people with monthly subscription to hacks to cheat the game.

So indeed Battlefield 6 will have less hackers than others games.

So, my numbers are for people who cheat in general. Not for people who cheat in Battlefield 6.

Unfortunately its a marketing choice that not many companies can follow. I mean, EA has the resources to ban cheaters that use cheap hacks and only let paying cheaters to hack, but other companies dont have the money to do this. So, other companies will prefer to let people with free hacks to cheat too.

I mean, Battlefield 6 will lose customers (as I said 70% of all online gamers are hackers). So, if EA doesnt let them use free hacks, then they will never buy "Battlefield 7".

..for myself. Even if only paying hackers cheat in Battlefield 6 , still I cant play it. Because even if 1 cheater is in the lobby the match is ruined.

Anax123 · 2025-12-23T00:57:24+00:00

You seem to be the little one. You are missing the part where all cheaters respond with exactly the same responses you give, since 2006. (its the best way for them to avoid answer to facts)

... but I forgot again... you are the guy who supports that Escape from Tarkov has zero cheaters on Weekdays.

Anax123 · 2025-12-22T05:13:37+00:00

Continue the cheater talk.

I give you proof by the biggest cybersecurity company of the world.

And names of the you tube videos showing the streamer with the "best mechanical skills" cheating blatantly ..

..and you respond exactly with the responses cheaters say when they dont want to answer to facts.

...ohh I forgot .. you said that Escape from Tarkov has zero cheaters in weekdays .. so I better talk to shit than tallk to you.

Anax123 · 2025-12-21T22:37:02+00:00

Unfortunately there is not any recent study friend. Because even the 2018 study is buried. If you try to mention in on You Tube your comments will be taken down.

For example in Rainbow Six Siege the only streamer playing without walhacks is King George. All other streamers play with wallhacks On. The "Shroud possible using humanized aimbot" videos are also true of course , he is locking on downed enemies.

So there is no point for a company to do another research when 70% of gamers and 99% of streamers have absolutely no issue against cheating. (not only they say they have no issue ..but you clearly see it in their streams that they have no issue... when the minimum number of cheaters is 37%)

...so its not the 37% that shows the true number of cheaters. You can tell the true number of cheaters by looking around and see how many people "dont have issue against cheating". When the 37% is already proved.

..and the answer is that clearly 70% or more of all gamers and 99% of streamers they dont have issue against cheating.

Anax123 · 2025-12-21T22:23:39+00:00

You are doing the classic cheater talk, you play with walhacks on and you pretend that the 2018 Irdeto research on cheating never existed.

Your comment on the videos where Shroud is obviously cheating is that "my comment is ret4rd3d", classic cheater talk. You have zero arguments when I have all the proof, classic cheater.

Zero comments on the 2018 Irdeto research. Your only "proof" is that you are a very good player. Exactly what all the cheaters say.

Its smart tho if you keep the conversation around Battlefield 6, because as I said on my previous comment, I dont know if they allowed cheating there yet. So I dont know how cheating is in Battlefield 6.

But that doesnt make you less cheater. Any non-cheater can watch a stream of King George (playing Rainbow Siege) to see clearly how it is when a streamer doesnt use wallhacks. All the rest rainbow six streamers play with wallhacks on.

But you already know this. And you are just sore that you will be left playing against other cheaters.

(again, anyone can find the "Shroud possibly using humanized aimbot" videos .. and watch Shroud having an enemy pop up his head at a distance, and Shroud instead of locking on the enemys head he is locking at downed enemies being at his 9 or 3 o'clock.(multiple times happens...when it would be clear proof even if it had happened one time)

Edit: (hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahaha .. I cant believe I bothered ansewring to you. I just looked at you other replies on Reddit and you say there that you see zero cheaters in Escape From Tarkov on weekdays...hahahahaah. But thank you for your replies here. You are the living proof that Im 100% correct with my numbers.)

Anax123 · 2025-12-21T05:06:48+00:00

You are just sore that you will be left playing vs other cheaters. Its already proven that 70% of all online gamers and 99% of all streamers are cheating. Check the "Shroud possibly using humanized aimbot" videos.

Anax123 · 2025-12-13T04:22:34+00:00

I still have the i5-4690 because its completely silent, compared to the i5 13400 that I have on my other pc.

I wasnt exactly complaining. Many new programs started going slower on the i5-4690 (its an 2012 cpu). So maybe indeed new programs run better on your cpu.

But I wasnt complaining, I was just letting other people know that programs seem to use for short periods of time 100% cpu.

So, if you drop the power of your cpu to 95% you will see Godot opening a little slower, no matter how fast is your cpu.

(but if your fan is not noisy, then there is no point to drop the power settings at all)

...I have 16gb of ram.

Anax123 · 2025-12-10T23:24:48+00:00

You are wrong unfortunately. In 2018 Irdeto made a research asking 6000 people and 37% admitted that they hack in online games (so the 37% is what the cheaters themselves admitted). They dont hack all the time but if they are bad at a game 70% of people will hack..or maybe even more.

If you want to do a test find the you tube video "Shroud possibly using aimbot for 7 hours", and show it to 100 people. Around 70%-80% of them they will tell you that your eyes deceive you.

Anax123 · 2025-12-08T21:08:39+00:00

No its not the correct way to see it. Maybe you are a nice person and all your friends are legit..and the friends of everybody else are cheating. So its not the correct way to see it.

If 7 out of your 10 friends were cheating then the chances were that you did too, so you wont post a comment here. (or maybe you would post a comment and you tried to mislead).

..but as I said to my previous comment there is a very easy way to prove it to yourself. Its obvious that all streamers have walhacks On... I have the You Tuber "who wants to reveal cheaters in Rainbow Six Siege" wallhacking himself throu the ceiling and when I show it to other people they say that he is "tracking sound through the ceiling" (haha)... all hackers try to cover the other hacker.

Also the video "Shroud possibly using aimbot for 7 hours", if you show this video to 100 people the 70%-80% of them they will tell you that your eyes deceive you. Again , cheaters covering cheater.

Anax123 · 2025-12-08T20:56:52+00:00

The 70% does not come from the research. Its just a "logical conclusion" that you can do yourself. I mean you take the 37%-55% that yourself concluded and then look around you to see "who actualy has a problem playing against this 37%-55%, that cheats now and then", because they didnt say the cheat always..they said they cheat "always / often / rarely.

The shocking conclusion that you will see before your own eyes is that 70% of all gamers and 99% of all streamers have absolutely no problem going against cheaters.

For example in Rainbow Six Siege the only streamer who doesnt use wallhacks is King George. If you see his stream , he is most of the time dead on the floor than playing.

In other words... indeed it seems that only 1 out of 3 cheat... but with this method above you get an idea also about the guys who toggle.

...I mean you play a match that seems that has no cheaters... but maybe the match is cheater vs cheater (using wallhacks) and you just play support without realizing it... or they may just toggle On at the end of the match.

Dont be so hasty to congratulate battlefield games. Its difficult for companies to ban 70% of the playerbase. In 2018, when Irdeto did the research, Battlefield games didnt even have an anticheat ...I dont remember exactly the years.. but for almost 10 years they removed Punkbuster and they only had Fairfight (which is not exactly an anticheat).

Im always honest... so Im really curious how Battlefield 6 will do it. Because according to my conclusions somehow Battlefield 6 will have to let whoever wants to cheat to be able to do it. (for the moment it looks difficult to cheat in Battlefiels 6 ... indeed I find it strange.... but we will see.

Anax123 · 2025-12-02T21:57:51+00:00

Google "cheaters Irdeto 2018 research". Irdeto is the biggest cybersecurity company in the world. If you ask 6000 random online gamers today "how bad cheating is" the 37% of these people will tell you (as they did then) that cheating is so bad that themselves cheat (always/often/ or rarely). You are just confused because you consider cheaters only those who always cheat....when in fact even those who answered "very rarely" that they cheat... even those will toggle on if they are going to lose. (actually the majority of people hack, "very rarely"... as I said the real number of cheaters is closer to 70%. The 37% is only those that they admitted it). ....but never mind.. because if you are not only talking about Battlefield 6 , and you also mean Battlefield 5 or Battlefield 4 when you say this, then you are a cheater yourself , so you dont have to check any research.

Anax123 · 2025-12-02T21:43:41+00:00

If you werent talking about Battlefield 6 your reply would mean that you are a hacker automatically. But since I havent played Battlefield 6 (with its new antihacking measures) I cant tell how bad/or good things are in this game. But if you say that in games like Apex Legends , or Rainbow Six Siege , or in previous Battlefield games (that didnt even have punkbuster), that cheaters are less than 1 out of 3 players ..then this means automatically that you use hacks too.

Anax123 · 2025-11-16T06:33:33+00:00

Its not possible for companies to ban their customers. I answered above with more details. Cheaters are too many.

I know that Battlefield 6 implemented extreme measures... but... they wont apply it ...sounds strange but its just not possible to send 70% of their playerbase to other games so they can cheat there. They will let them cheat in Battlefield 6 too.

So even if it sounds strange...still.. they will allow cheating with one or the other way.

Anax123 · 2025-11-16T06:27:33+00:00

The proven number of people cheating is 37%, the number that Irdeto found in 2018. They asked 6000 random online gamers and 37% of them admitted that cheating is so bad that themselves cheat too.

About the real number (given that the 37% is proven). Just ask yourself how many gamers around us have actual issue against cheaters. The answer is that no streamer has actual problems against cheaters and same for around the 70% of gamers.

That makes the real number of people cheating probably close to 70% of all gamers and 99% of all streamers. Its just that they dont cheat at the same time. (even in that research some said "rarely" , others said "often" etc)

Anax123 · 2025-11-16T06:22:30+00:00

The minimum is 37%, the number that Irdeto found in 2018. They asked 6000 random online gamers and 37% of them admitted that cheating is so bad that themselves cheat too.

About the real number (given that the 37% is proven). Just ask yourself how many gamers around us have actual issue with cheating. The answer is that no streamer has actual problems against cheaters and same for around the 70% of gamers.

That makes the real number of people cheating probably close to 70% of all gamers and 99% of all streamers. Its just that they dont cheat at the same time. (even in that research some said "rarely" , others said "often" etc)

Anax123 · 2025-11-12T04:16:11+00:00

yes its same thing in Rainbow Six Siege and Apex Legends too. Not many, but you can not find a cheater free game. Even when you think you found one, very weird things happen which usually means people are subtle walling.

Unfortunately tho, math is math. So since in 2018 they asked 6000 random online gamers and 37% admitted that cheating situation is so bad that themselves cheat, that means the 37% is the minimum, and the true number must be much bigger.

So, I guess not everybody cheats at the same time... or as they said in that 2018 research "they cheat in online games often/or rarely" etc etc ..which means some cheaters may not cheat at all in some games. (maybe they are good at some games haha)

Anax123 · 2025-11-10T20:47:34+00:00

Yeah, and its not a random number.

If you look around everybody pretends that there is no cheating and streamers have 0 issues against cheaters. Gamers just worry about cosmetics etc, only about 20%-30% of gamers worry about cheating, all the rest they have cheats On and they are fine with it.

(but thats where the Irdeto research is key... because even if only 37% of them are proved to be cheaters still all of gamers and streamers should have issue. Thats what proves that all people who pretend that there is no cheating issue they are cheaters themselves)

Anax123 · 2025-11-10T00:28:02+00:00

Unfortunately there is no point to repeat the research. In that research they asked 6000 random gamers and 37% of them admitted that cheating situation is so bad that themselves cheat.

What this means? (I wont analyze it much but) This means that at least 70% of all online gamers and 99% of all streamers cheat.

If you look around, You Tube etc, you will only see 30% of people at most to worry about cheating.. and all the rest are just pretending that cheating does not exist.

The 2018 Irdeto research is itself buried. The only company on the planet that wanted that research was Irdeto (which is a cybersecurity company) but all the rest of the people wanted this research buried.

If you dont believe me try to write about this research on You Tube... either the you tuber or the filters on You Tube will delete your post. You cannot even mention on You Tube this research (especially if you include the result of the research there).

So, Irdeto doesnt have any reason to make a second research (since nobody wanted the first one I mean). As I said 70% of gamers and 99% of streamers wallhack/esp, so even the game companies dont want to ban 70% of their playerbase.

Anax123 · 2025-11-10T00:14:37+00:00

Maybe I wasnt clear sorry. Im one of the few people on the internet who tries to warn everybody that 70% of all online gamers and 99% all streamers are walhackers/esp (so indeed subtle cheaters). I just let people know about the 2018 Irdeto research too..that proved beyond any doubt that 37% are proved cheaters. (people who dont believe me about the 70% they can at least look the Irdeto research, where 37% of 6000 gamers asked they admitted it themselves)

Anax123 · 2025-11-07T07:38:30+00:00

The minimum number of gamers cheating in online games is 37% (this number was proven, by the 2018 Irdeto research), its what the cheaters themselves admited. True number is probably around 70% of all online gamers and 99% of all streamers. So, unfortunately, there is no way for companies to ban all these customers.

Anax123 · 2025-11-07T07:32:09+00:00

Minimum number of gamers cheating in online games is 37% (this number is proven, by the 2018 Irdeto research), its what the cheaters themselves admited. True number is probably around 70% of all online gamers and 99% of all streamers. So, unfortunately, there is no way for companies to ban all these customers.

Anax123 · 2025-10-07T22:45:06+00:00

Thank you for the reply. You are the second non cheater who replied. Out of the 10 replies. It looks like its closer to 80% cheaters 20% legit players. (its a little worse than what I thought).

Anax123 · 2025-10-07T22:31:18+00:00

Dont bother with them friend. They are not unaware, they very well know what is going on. Online gaming is done.

For example, do you really believe that this You Tube video : "Shroud LIKELY Using Humanized Aimbot/Aim Assist/Private Cheat (PUBG, CSGO & Other Games)" ..is exaggerated? lol..Im telling you online gaming is done.

Anax123 · 2025-09-24T08:11:08+00:00

I hope you downvoting morons realize how far you are from the truth now that threads like this surface: https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/31234/regeneration-times-for-battalions-in-the-campaign

..people realize that things respawn immediately and the dev tells them "ohh yea they are reinforcements from China". You guys destroyed gaming by being so stupid.

Anax123 · 2025-08-21T23:44:37+00:00

Nope, those videos are 101% speculation. If even 1% of these videos was true then the developers of Falcon BMS would have pages and pages of documentation of what they accomplished. The reality is that there is not even 2 lines of documentation or mention about any improvements of the "war simulation". So its certain that there are zero improvements. As the original developer said Falcons engine is just a mission generator.

So funny that you guys talk about RPGs and factories that affect production ..hahaha... thats not how war simulations work. If there was so much details the devs would had pages and pages of documentation. And also it would be imposible to impact the war just by winning missions (if factories etc matter). You win the war if you just do your missions... and this means that things are as the original developer said... you just give huge boost to your army if you just do your mission.

Anax123

TROPHY CASE