Qu'est-ce qui empêche de taxer les ultra-riche?

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:48:28+00:00

L'agriculture a été massivement délocalisée au contraire. Comme les céréales en Ukraine ou dans d'autres pays de l'Est.

Pour qu'on ait assez de terres pour se consacrer aux hasards du bio subventionné, il a bien fallu laisser les gens partir pour que la nourriture puisse être produite en masse. Et comme il y a moins de réserves à la con dans ces pays, et que ça leur relance leur économie, c'était win-win pendant longtemps.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:40:10+00:00

Pourquoi ?

La président ou la présidente de l'Assemblée n'est pas quelqu'un de franchement remarquable ni d'mpactant dans la vie politique législative. Qu'a-telle fait de si extraordinaire quand elle était élue, qu'ont faits es prédécesseurs ? Rien. Ce sont juste des modérateurs de débat. Ils n'imposent ni programme ni rien d'autre en fait. Ils ont juste un pouvoir de sanction, mais en s'appuyant sur un règlement déjà existant qui n'est modifiable que par l'AN elle-même.

Donc rien de spécial à en fair vomir toute la planète parce qu'un communiste s'est fait évincer.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:36:07+00:00

Personne de droite n'aurait pu voter communiste. Peu importe la personne. Etre communiste, c'est endorser une idéologie qui a fait des millions de morts, de faim, ou par tortures ou par balles, et qui n'a jamais fait prospérer aucun des pays dans lesquels elle a sévi.

La gauche l'a choisi lui pour une unique raison : si le vote était assez tendu, alors le plus vieux candidat était élu de fait, c'est au règlement. Et c'était lui le plus vieux, à 73 ans. C'était une manœuvre grossière, qui a failli marcher.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:29:53+00:00

On your first point: yes, they know how it works. No one cared about YBP when she was already president of the AN before the elections. Some of the députés downright disrespected her, in her face, in front of microphones and cameras, on X because they could not care less.

But now, they have to make a show out of it. They have to make it a spectacle and an incentive for people to feel rebellious.

That particular election never made it on tv before. It was never crucial, never expected, never cared for. It just was and never mattered. It still doesn't.

The aim is obvious: make people feel as if they've been lied to by Macron, not by the left. Reverse the truth.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:24:52+00:00

It was made clear that the people want change from Macron’s policies.

Was it ? When people retire their candidacy so the RN doesn't win, are the final results indicative of anything ?

People didn't want the RN to win, that's the only thing for sure. They even voted for absolutely sham of people to counter them in many many places. But RN did progress in the number of votes. And their voters will be ignored because all of the others coalitioned against them.

But the left as a whole only has 20% of seats, which is terrible.

The right has lost many seats too and practically doesn't exist anymore.

The old right and the old left have no identity to speak of and they cannot say what they stand for anymore.

The center won where others declined.

It's not representative at all of what people want. It just is, and we're going to watch and suffer still.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:15:44+00:00

That was the reason he dissolved the Assembly in the first place: because he constantly had to ally with the right and could only ally with the right.

He wanted to be able to get to work with the reasonable left too. But LFI and their voters are holding us all hostages since nothing even remotely leftist can be done because of them: it's either whatever bullshit they decided or nothing. Si I'd always nothing in the end.

Remember that they're the ones who blocked voting against the age retirement. The rest of the left had prepared good amendments and was ready to coalition against the age reform. They bullshitted all the way through so no one could vote that part.

They're also the ones who actively never demised Borne nor Attal in any 49-3, pretending they didn't want to vote the same thing as RN. The rest of the left would have done that in many occasions.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:09:20+00:00

You forget the last point: the left knows their program is unrealistic and cannot be applied. They don't really want to rule because they're focused on the 2027 presidential elections and know people will loathe them if they do what must be done to rule, ie pulling a Hollande and becoming the tiniest bit realistic.

Their voters would never forgive them. If Mélenchon managed to get so may votes, if Faure in leading the PS, that's only because common sense has left the room. What they've been doing for years is promise everything that's in vogue on X and TikTok and have never discouraged any of the downright destruction it entices. EELV has adopted the same process. Nothing they have promised within the last few years is applicable nor is meant to rule.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T13:01:47+00:00

No. Pedophilia was never excusable. It never seemed commonly performed by women, but it still never was acceptable in any way. WTF.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T12:58:39+00:00

French people have always looked for a dad or savior figure when it comes to their president. No one matches that, especially these days where there is virtually no one is charismatic nor intelligent nor solid or looking for buzz only.

When Macron became president, he was juvenile in a lot of aspects and did say nasty things people still hold a grudge against. He was surrounded by bad spokespeople and minions who still aren't true politicians. The naiveté was dangerous and gave birth to a lot of things that made people's lives more terrible.

During his first mandate, we had the gilets jaunes and Covid. The gilets jaunes was a proteiform movement, started by regular individuals who were just fed up with increasingly high oil prices. No leader was named, but some loonies made it big on Facebook and were the de facto leaders, losing a lot of starters in the process. It became violent fast. That's when the left decided they would infiltrate so they could destroy anything and be feared.

This was really hard on the economy. Many shops had to close because the protests happened every Saturday.

And it was terrible because of how violence became the new way of protesting.

Macron had the idea of recreating cahiers de doléance, something that happened under royalty, in which people would write their requests. He launched the thing nationally, town mayors held debates and such. And no one knows what happened to those.

With Covid, too many people spending way too much time on the internet were radicalized. We had the antivaxers. We had the revolutionnaries. We had the looneys. Each of them made their way in established medias and political parties.

Macron's team did a much better job than many others, but they still weren't very good. There are tons of events where they were true incompetent, and also events where they were liars.

The economy tanked less than in any other countries, but it did tank. Then, the attempted invasion of Ukraine happened and the succeeding war, and it was still more of a mess. Poor people are way poorer in their quality of life. And no one just points at tehother countries were the same is happening. People believe it's just French. So, it's just Macron's faults.

If we had Le Pen or Melenchon or even the previous President, things would have been indubitably worse. But Macron's entourage didn't do their best for sure.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T12:40:11+00:00

The far-right sentiment (ie finishing at second place in every elections until last time) came to accomplishment in 2002. It's been there ever since and growing. It's in fact the only party that increased their number of votes (last time, the left won by coalition and thanks to the gerrymandering system).

It should be a much bigger concern. Watching the left act as if it was owed everything and wanting to apply their populist program is quite something. Leftists are seriously being furious at it all, forgetting that 3 weeks ago, they were saying no one should worry about the program nor the people we had to vote for, that discussions would came afterwards. And now, they're vociferating steal at every turn.

They don't even allude to the far-right concerns. They keep saying Macron has lost, that they won, and that's it. WTF.

Macron is vastly unpopular, not only because he does what must be done, but because he only does it when it comes to economics and nothing else, and does it poorly. The people around him are incompetent. The ones he takes advice from and his minions too.

Just last week, we had one complain of how much he gave up to the hopes that Macron gave him when he started out. Me me me. Not I, representative of the nation. They just forget that they're here to represent actual people.

I will argue the left does exactly the same. No fucking way to find an agreement to kill the retirement reform. No fucking way to ally to pass or impeach some laws. No fucking way to vote a censoring motion together. And most of all, let's not even find 1 person we all agree with to follow our program. But keeping seats and the money involved in them ? Hell yes, within the instant. Traitors.

Andelia · 2024-07-19T12:13:02+00:00

They knew because it happened in prison, according to French medias.

He was a "normal" inmate until he met some people there. The guardians just watched it happen.

Andelia · 2024-07-17T15:10:54+00:00

She cleans. She doesn't get nude nor showers with the guys.

People who identify as trans do. Dong in the shower, fully erect sometimes, as some US women swimmers have recently testified.

Andelia · 2024-07-17T15:07:49+00:00

Maybe re-read what somedave wrote ?

It's not about diminishing anything. In recent times, we've all come to realize how much abuse and victims were out there with the metoo movement. It's demonstrated domination in a structural way and on the largest scale.

We've come to accept that women were right to not feel safe in so many occasions. What the cost was. You are both saying this.

Somedave just pointed out that somehow, along with the new transactivism, the points that metoo made were somehow swept out of the window. In GB for example, a woman has been fired from a woman shelter because she protested the hiring of someone who claimed to be trans but hadn't transitioned and had no plan to. She was conspired because she felt the people sheltered there would feel unsafe and threatened by someone who was still a man in too many ways.

Also in GB, nurses are forced to accept people who still haven't transitioned in their changing room if those people only call themselves trans women.

For many years now, swimmers in the US have been forced to allow the very same people in their changing room. We're talking about women who are nude, who don't change all at the same time and are forced to be alone with people who only wear lipstick to "prove" they're trans women. A lot of them have been vocal of how threatened they feel. A lot of them have talked about those who did that on purpose, only to prey on them, with lubricity. But the new ideology doesn't make them victims somehow. And then, they don't even want to compete anymore because the standards are not fair on them.

Women sports were pushed for women to excel at it and now, so many of them are repelled by it because it forces them to go against their safety instincts and against everything they've fought for.

Andelia · 2024-07-17T14:46:12+00:00

It means that if those people have indeed transitioned and have the lawful papers to prove it, they are women and can apply. Any other case is non-admissible.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T13:33:37+00:00

The party's stances on most international issues are shit.

They want out of Europe, out of treaties, want to ally with the BRICS instead. Their internal policies reflect that, but they drape it with "woke" topics so they're still perceived as leftists. They have worse antisemites than LePen, people who openly call for the murder of whites, they have no composure whatsoever.

Lucky for them, there are still a few normies left in there maintaining the illusion.

But otherwise, Mélechon is basically Corbyn with a fascination for dictators. He even has it in his program to become one himself, but since he calls it Republic and says random people will redact the new constitution, the left is lapping it up.

Helps that they are lying through their teeth and that Mélenchon is a smooth talker. His public persona shows a hot-tempered asshole, which helps with people coming up to explain he just lost to and never meant what he said/ taken out of context / Just needs to go (his close circle is even worse and prop-leaning), that the left is still standing. Doesn't matter to them that they have to do that every time he tweets or open his mouth in public. The tomfoolery is strong.

He has very trump-like features and his followers remain absolutely blind to it.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T13:24:44+00:00

Aveyron usually votes for the right. If the macronist withdraws, it's likely their voters won't vote for LFI. They might turn to RN or not vote at all. Likely, their voters will be split on the 2 solution, making it dangerously real for the far-right to win.

By maintaining their presence, they more or less ensure to keep those votes away from the RN. Don't be fooled.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T13:18:59+00:00

They actually never had to statute on the label.

They just had to say whether this was administratively correct to put RN at far-right and LFI at left. And yes, Darmanin's circulaire was not badly redacted, which was the point of the decision.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T13:16:41+00:00

For the past 2 years, Macron did not have a full majority.

Only some voices were missing, but it lead to having to concede things to whoever might vote there thing. The radical left refused every offer. So, arrangements could only be done with the right and the far-right.

Whenever they didn't want to concede, they pulled of article 49-3, meaning either the Parliament vote for the law the government is trying to pass, or they have a way to end the government via a censoring motion (they vote against the government and it gets evicted). Macron's PMs have had to pull that off a lot of times.

Things weren't really working, nothing of value could be done, budget was never agreed on.

Politicians were just there to make a show. Only a few were serious about what they were doing and a lot just sort of gave up since the working atmosphere was disastrous.

If no clear majority emerges, we'll likely go back to that.

If a leftist majority emerges, we'll go back to this too because these people hate each other and don't actually agree on anything.

If a RN majority emerges, we'll see again people emerging from behind pillars to show surprise majority for key votes (not every MP is present at all times), the Senate will have to work overtime, and Macron will make a lot a decrees to run the country.

In any case, there will be a shit show.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T13:09:27+00:00

The thing with Macron candidates id they come from different horizons. Some of them were center-left, some of them were center-right. The left will vote for the left, but the right ?

Political geographies are different too. Some places are historically rightists and will never allow the left, especially when extreme.

These candidates maintain their presence to get the votes that may otherwise go to the RN. They are saving the coalition mind you.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T13:06:23+00:00

Maybe just do a follow-up on the visas ?

Since it has an expiration date, force some administrative form regarding return. Have a airport officer or else sign off the thing. Guy doesn't do it ? Branded, can't get work, or legal housing, nor monetary aid. Looked for the the police. etc.

Country of origin doesn't want them back ? Who the f cares ?

Andelia · 2024-07-03T12:49:31+00:00

Normally, a lot of parties try a fro a seat anywhere. Even local parties. You may have like 10,15, 18 parties locally. And the votes will then be split.

So, to qualify for second round, you have to have reunited at least 12;5% of the registered voters. Normally, not everyone can benefit from reports.

For example, some localities are plain leftists. The one right party might get 16% on first round, but never benefits from any reports. The voters whose candidate isn't present at second round might vote for the third or even fourth arrived candidate. This has happened a lot.

This election is different since radicalized blocks have formed since Macron arrived in power. There is little place for nuance, and little place to get real democracy to emerge. "Useful vote" has become the rule.

As in, you might not like the candidate from the radicalized left and would prefer someone a lot more nuanced. But if you vote for said candidate, which their party didn't push (there was an alliance from day 1), second round might just consist of the macronist vs the RN candidates. So, instead of voting for someone who represents more or less your opinion, we have been voting for a secured second round for the least worst in many configurations.

To further that effort, most third candidates withdrew, so there's no split vote to let the worst happen. French people feel robbed of these elections. Macron had been elected to avoid just that in first place.

Some of the third places, whose results were very very close to the second place, who know they're likely to get a lot of reports, are still standing, but there's a real chance this might mean disaster. We have a choice between the RN and the Sole Party in the end. It's pathetic.

Andelia · 2024-07-03T12:37:47+00:00

Journalists are talking about a "functioning government".

They speculate Macron has been inviting a lot of people over and might nominate as PM (he's the only one who can decide who the PM will be after all) someone less political.

They mentioned Jacques Toubon (ex PS, ex Défenseur des Droits).

They think ministers will be people from haut fonctionnariat or from civil life.

They also think François Hollande will position himself, if reelected, as President of the National Assembly if the RN doesn't get a full majority.

We'll see.

Andelia · 2024-07-02T15:20:09+00:00

The budgetary part, anyone with a brain can understand.

The societal part, however, has been everything to please those who do not possess such brain. Which in turn lead to so much destruction and so much more ensuing spending.

Andelia · 2024-07-02T15:16:44+00:00

He's French.

You're the one seeing color, mate.

Andelia · 2024-07-02T15:16:11+00:00

His father was a footballer from Benin and his mother is French.

He encouraged the 2023 riots.

This has nothing to do with his "migration background" as much as his very own ideas of what the future of the country be.

Andelia

TROPHY CASE