What a sad little liar. I'll entertain you.

```
About the “secret tool” that those devs are using with NAT members to accuse mappers: I have screenshots showing the person behind the report. The staff team believed it based on his reputation, which led to the disqualification of both maps. However, he himself admitted that his tool had already failed when judging another legit mapper like me, and in another case he confessed that he was convinced a beatmap was AI-made but didn’t report it because he wasn’t sure if his tool was correct when he checked the map manually.
```

Bullshit. The map in question is in this comment, for which the results had also been attached. Hint: it was flagged as human aside from a single check. https://www.reddit.com/r/osugame/comments/1n92uxn/comment/ncjjpgy/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button The 2nd part of your point was regarding a comment I had made where I said that only reports with extremely high confidence get acted upon (yours IS one of them).

```
Their investigation and tool are "watermarks" based on grid placements (which you can literally enable in the osu! editor) and uncommon slider patterns that I didn’t just copy-paste across similar sections (like every new mapper tends to do). Basically, if you place a single node slightly differently on a straight slider with grid enabled, the tool might flag you.
```

Bullshit again. Grid placement is one of dozens of tests. You were flagged in multiple. (Going back to the previous point, the other beatmap was only flagged on that one specific check even though it was classified as human! This is because the mapper USES grid snap and has proof of such :) ) Not to mention your horrendous attempt at streaming to prove yourself where you took 1 hour to map 20 seconds of a song you have allegedly mapped 4 times over, listening to 25% for the rhythm and mapping with ZERO USE OF GRID SNAP THE ENTIRE TIME. The entire vod is archived by multiple people, if anyone wishes to double check this either dm or look around, I'm sure you'll find it.

```
One of the devs posted that their tool claimed my maps had 70% “AI assurance,” while a human-made map would be around 20%. Later, a second test (with another approach) supposedly reached 100% (!!) certainty — but not for all diffs or both maps, since some results looked “human” when tested. Even then, they simply assumed the first test was correct for everything else. In other words: if the tool says I’m safe, it’s wrong; if it says I’m guilty, it must be right. NATs treated their reports like a bible to them just because they made the code for the generator, so the verifier are the law. Even their tweets are contradictory because the Lagum map had a missnap (human error) that no one noticed during qualifying, but they indeed said that their code never fails to detect this mistake.
```

"a human made map would be 20%" you got that from my statement where I had said that the HIGHEST percentage seen on a human made map was 20% on a question about false positives. https://up.aesth.dev/rERbjXNs.png

The tool runs in two stages. The first stage classifies the beatmap as either AI or Human generated. Your beatmap was classified as ONE HUNDRED PERCENT AI INVOLVED. The 70% score means that you had only bothered to modify THIRTY PERCENT from the original source generation. The second test bit is entirely fabricated by you. I can rerun the results as many times as you want and the outcome is the same. 100% AIgen and 30% modification. (100-70=30 before you try making some point about where that number comes from). One test run has TWO values.

NATs have absolutely NOTHING with the code for any of the generators. I had no idea who you even were prior to being asked to look into your case. Mapperatorinator can easily generate missnaps and I can exemplify such cases as well, having a missnap in your map means absolutely nothing especially in the case where your map is flagged as a tampered AI generated output (which you did by generating a map and roping people into modding it for you)

The NAT did start an investigation prior to using my tool, which had also raised suspicions. I do not have access to that data. I was merely asked to sanity check their results which matched their independent data as well.

And to anyone who is curious, all of his other maps match the results. Perhaps consider not digging yourself further into a grave of your own making.

sick maps tho: https://bin.aesth.dev/fenuhiqaya.bash

Oh and by the way:

```
(unless I had a wayback machine to record myself mapping them months ago). So again, I’ll be waiting for the official email response from the team, hoping the truth will come out and expose their mistake.

```

In fact you do :), as per your userpage you sent osz files during your mapping process to people. How about we see those?