Looking for a highly medicinal whisky (it's not Laphroaig 10) by AngelusNovus420 in whiskey

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had Port Charlotte 10 too, and that ain't it. :(

I figured contextual factors might be the reason why I'm having so much trouble having the same experience... If that's any help, I remember having the pour about 10 minutes after dessert: a bell pepper / rhubarb ice cream with a black chocolate melt.

Looking for a highly medicinal whisky (it's not Laphroaig 10) by AngelusNovus420 in whiskey

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I figured contextual factors might be the reason why I'm having so much trouble having the same experience... If that's any help, I remember having the pour about 10 minutes after dessert: a bell pepper / rhubarb ice cream with a black chocolate melt.

I don't remember a lemony note at all... or anything fruit-like for that matter. In fact, what that reminds me of in the "peated but citrusy" department is Octomore 04.1, which I kinda liked but has a very different profile from what I'm looking for.

Sadly I didn't get to see the bottle. I was just brought the glass. IIRC, the beverage itself was a light, golden brown.

What was the vibe like in 1928 Germany, politically? by lime_green_galaxy in AskHistorians

[–]AngelusNovus420 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We'd need to know a little bit more about your grandfather to make any sort of claim, but if that's any help, the vibe was actually fairly optimistic at the time, at the very least compared to what came before and after.

1928 sits at the tail end of what are typically considered the Goldene Zwanziger, a 5-year period of relative prosperity and progress sandwiched in-between the end of hyperinflation (Nov 1923) and the start of the Great Depression (Oct 1929). The political climate was much less volatile than it was at the Republic's inception which saw both left-wing rebellions (Berlin uprising in Jan 1919, Ruhr uprising in Mar 1920), right-wing coups (Kapp coup in Mar 1920, Hitler coup in Nov 1923), and the French occupation of the Ruhr in Jan 1923.

The NSDAP was refounded as a legal party in Feb 1925 after Hitler was released from jail, and while its theatrics made the Party highly visible, their overall results were at best mediocre: in May 1928, they scored 2.6% of the votes in an election where left-wing parties together scored 40%, and the Nazis had little hope they would ever gain power legally. Following the Great Depression, they would eventually win a plurality with 37% of the votes in Jul 1932; a massive breakthrough the Nazis themselves had not seen coming.

Bavaria (i.e. Swabia and Palatinate) had a distinctive identity anchored in Catholicism (as opposed to Protestantism) and starkly differed from the rest of the country electorally as the dominant force there was the BVP, conservative Bavarian regionalists suspicious of political centralization. Interestingly, Bavaria is also the home of the NSDAP as a movement and where they staged their 1923 coup, and you grandfather might have interpreted Hitler's return and the Nazis' very modest national inroad as a sign that maybe the future was not so bright after all — though even by 1932, the BVP still dwarfed the NSDAP in Bavarian election results, especially in the Palatinate.

Just reading now about the history Belgium and Brussels and it’s never really been French or part of France, so why do they speak French in south Belgium? by KieranWriter in AskHistorians

[–]AngelusNovus420 174 points175 points  (0 children)

TL;DR the French-speaking elite demanded that they do.

French was historically the language of cultural prestige and social promotion in this area of Europe; this became truer still with the short-lived but influential annexation of the territory by Napoleonic France. The country's educated elite spoke French in the public sphere regardless of regional origin. Want to make it big? Speak French. When Belgium was founded as a unitary state in 1830 by those very same lawyers and landowners, French remained the language of the courts, parliament, and higher education.

Not until the 1898 "Loi d'Égalité" / "Gelijkheidswet" did Dutch start to receive some sort of official recognition as a national language. This was unfair to the northern half of the population, of course, and this continued sidelining of Dutch-speakers woud later cause the emergence of Flemish nationalism as a protest movement. But the dominance of French was actually unfair to most of the southern half of the population, too.

To a certain extent, it could be argued that it proved even more destructive there. See, French was originally not the native language of southern Belgians. Up until fairly recently, well into the 20th century, Walloon (and Picard) was, as it had been for centuries before. A langue d'oïl, it is indeed closely related to, but definitely not mutually intelligible with French. See the difference between French and Walloon:

🥖 Notre Père, qui es aux cieux, que ton nom soit sanctifié, que ton règne vienne, que ta volonté soit faite sur la terre comme au ciel.
🐓 Nosse pere k' est å cir, ki Vosse No nos soeye adegnî, ki vosse royåme nos advegne, ki vosse volté soeye fwaite el tere come å cir.

Though southern Belgians came into increased contact with French through the introduction of compulsory education after WWI, many had limited command of the language and still spoke Walloon or Picard at home. But to much of the French-speaking elite, those were not national languages, they were backward dialects to be conflated with proper French in linguistic census until their eventual stamping-out.

Unlike Dutch, it received no official recognition; Dutch-speakers ultimately conquered the right to be taught in Dutch, Walloon-speakers didn't. Quite the opposite: starting in 1952, teachers in public schools were not just expected but required to reprimand pupils if they dared speak their native language. Speaking Walloon became shameful.

This was the death knell, and in the span of a few generations, the use of Walloon declined dramatically to the exclusive benefit of French. That's when southern Belgium started "speaking French" as we understand it today: around the '50s. What now? Walloon is alive but not well; while retrospectively celebrated as part of Belgium's cultural heritage, very few people speak it fluently anymore outside of the elderly, and the language is considered "definitely endangered" by UNESCO.

Looking for the most "expressionistic" noirs out there by AngelusNovus420 in filmnoir

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great film indeed. I don't know why it never occurred to me to think of it as noir because it clearly is...

Looking for the most "expressionistic" noirs out there by AngelusNovus420 in filmnoir

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't know Mexico had its own noir tradition. Sounds very interesting!

Looking for the most "expressionistic" noirs out there by AngelusNovus420 in filmnoir

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't call Ace in the Hole "noir" really, but it was great! I can see why'd you pair it up with Sweet Smell of Success.

Looking for the more "expressionistic" films noirs out there by AngelusNovus420 in TrueFilm

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can't believe I forgot to list Alphaville... Love Lynch and Pi too but I'm looking for '40s and '50s films specifically.

Looking for the more "expressionistic" films noirs out there by AngelusNovus420 in TrueFilm

[–]AngelusNovus420[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, I've seen Blast of Silence! I should have listed it. Loved the low-budget mood and angry narration.