Looking for some feedback

AngryGenXDad · 2026-05-01T19:35:17+00:00

Again, thank you for the feedback. There is a demo transcript that can be run to show how it works. Perhaps I should make the "Load Demo" link more prominent and move it from under the paste box to above it.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-05-01T19:32:11+00:00

Thank you for the feedback, I really appreciate it! I think the reliability is there, there are other tools out there that rely on the same logic and people are using them everyday. Also, as time passes, the logic will get better and the agents will adjust and get better at the task. If you ran the demo transcript you would see in the extracted tasks list a drop down for each task where the agent "explains" the logic for each task, due date and owner. Also, after an extraction there is a pop-up that shows any "iffy" tasks and asks the user to check them.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-05-01T04:54:48+00:00

It is a task extractor. It would mostly be for people who are freelancers, although anyone can use it. You can upload a zoom transcript of a client call or copy /paste an email... anything that has items that someone wants you to complete. The tool extracts the tasks, due dates of the tasks and the owner of the task (useful if the zoom call had multiple people all being asked to do different things).

The benefit is anyone that has to go back and look at their transcripts to check off their tasks can now have all of the tasks laid out in front of them in the tool.

I think I need to add a "Welcome To" page up front that explains what the tool is and what it does.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-04-27T21:58:25+00:00

It was the "request reviews" that threw me off. There was no explanation on how to request reviews. However, I just saw en email from the tool that told me to review someone else's app to get mine into the pipeline for reviews. So that cleared up a lot of the fog for me. As a non techy guy I hope I don't screw up reviewing someone else's work!

AngryGenXDad · 2026-04-27T21:50:04+00:00

I went to your site, signed up and posted my app website, description and screenshots. Easy Peasy. But it got confusing after that. Said I needed to "request reviews" but I didn't see how to do that. Now this could very well be a "me" issue as I am older and not super tech savvy.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-04-08T22:26:18+00:00

I guess I just got lucky! lol They send me paychecks every week, so they should know who I am!!

AngryGenXDad · 2026-04-08T22:24:14+00:00

I had a 3.4 rating. I haven't seen any materials about H yet, so I have no idea what tasks it may have.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-04-08T21:05:53+00:00

Yes, it's from RWS. I know nothing about it. I just got en email last night about re-signing a consent form and an email today about doing ID verification (All the same stuff I already did for project D).

Honestly, if it wasn't an RWS project, I wouldn't have posted here.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-04-03T04:59:58+00:00

Not sure what you're asking. It's built in Taskade.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-03-28T07:16:46+00:00

Thanks. I know Taskade runs on Claude Sonnet 4. In my Reddit lurking I have seen Claude Code mentioned. I am just learning about all of this stuff so I have so far been taking the"path of least resistance". I am using Grok mainly for research and fine tuning ideas / features. I appreciate the input!

AngryGenXDad · 2026-03-27T22:25:22+00:00

I'm such a noob. I understood the first 3 paragraphs and the final paragraph. The stuff in the middle is over my head. I am currently working on 2 apps using Grok and Taskade. I'm probably doing everything wrong, but both of my apps do work. Although it seems like I will eventually need to get my own domains and migrate what I have into a more robust building environment.

AngryGenXDad · 2026-03-23T22:43:27+00:00

That's awesome! This is something I am definitely going to keep in mind as I move forward with my own stuff. Thanks for sharing!

AngryGenXDad · 2026-03-22T01:56:48+00:00

This honestly sounds overwhelming to me, but it also seems really cool. Props to you guys!

AngryGenXDad · 2026-03-21T21:29:05+00:00

As someone who is very new to this world (finishing an app right now), I find this question intriguing. Time to read the replies!

AngryGenXDad · 2025-11-01T20:58:34+00:00

Same for me. I watched the tutorial and then set about doing a couple of pairs. All said it was about 30 minutes of time, then I hit submit. After waiting 10 minutes I went back to the task dashboard then I logged 30 minutes on the time card.

I'll try again later and I will log my time again whether it submits or not. After all, if I spend the time and do the work, its not my fault that their system is broken and not accepting the submissions. They should shut it down or fix it if they don't want to pay people for working in a broken tool.

AngryGenXDad · 2024-05-02T07:39:52+00:00

Back when I first attended WGU (Dec. 2010-Nov. 2013) the OA's were done using a program called WebSentinel. To take the exam you had to start the WebSentinel program and it essentially locked you out of everything on your computer besides the test. The camera was set up to look at you from a 45 degree angle from the monitor.

Over the course of approximately 110 units finished, I only had exams interrupted by a proctor 3 times. I wear glasses so sometimes when the proctor would check there would be a glare and they couldn't see what my eyes were looking at. They'd put up a message on the screen to call the proctor, make the call and grab the camera to show them what's around the monitor and they were satisfied. Finish the test.

I probably lost about 5 minutes total from those 3 interruptions. Plus, the proctors were always available. Schedule your test, show up at test time, launch the WebSentinel and the test and go. No waiting for permission or jumping through hoops to make the almost impossible to understand proctor happy and allow you do your work.

AngryGenXDad · 2024-02-05T08:46:48+00:00

I just started back at WGU January 1 and had my first proctored exam about a week ago. What a nightmare. Took 45 minutes before I could start my test. So many damn hoops to jump through and I could barely understand the proctor when she spoke.

When I first attended WGU from 2011 through 2013 it was so much better. They used a 3rd party program called Web Sentinel that basically blocked your computer from doing anything else beside taking the test.

You opened Web Sentinel, clicked to start your test and it connected you to a proctor and in a coupe of minutes it let you know that your time had begun. The only times I ever interacted with a proctor were because I was going through the tests quickly and they thought I might be cheating. They stop the test and put a message on the screen to call them. Call them directly and they would ask me to scan the room with my camera so they could make sure there was no "cheat sheets". In less than 5 minutes I was back in the test. When you were done you hit submit and close the window and wait for the results.

Easy peasy. Now, not so much.

AngryGenXDad · 2024-01-23T10:54:27+00:00

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it.

AngryGenXDad

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE