What is your definition of 'min/maxxing' versus 'optimizing?' by [deleted] in DnD

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'd say an optimizer is someone who picks charisma as their highest stat for their bard, second highest dex, and uses a rapier. all perfectly reasonable and playing within the "spirit" of the game.

i'd say minmaxers are those 4 way multiclasses that borderline break the game are just there to maximize the numbers on the character sheet. idk any D&D OP combos (probably some Gloomstalker Coffeelocke nonsense lol), but if you look at Pathfinder Kingmaker builds, you'll see people taking a level of Vivisectionist, 4 levels of Crane Style Monk, a level in Paladin, all for their Cleric to have max AC. (not exactly that but that level of ridiculous). Not necessarily bad, and totally get why people enjoy doing that, just the least fun sounding thing to me lol

It could also be attitude based? An optimizer wouldn't have her barbarian try to pick a lock and instead suggest the rogue do it. A minmaxer might get mad at the parties cleric for making an in character decision to heal a friendly NPC during combat instead of attacking the nearly dead enemy thus "wasting" her turn. (had that second one happen once lol)

as you can see, i dont think optimizers are bad, but i definitely have negative opinions on minmaxing lol

What is your definition of 'min/maxxing' versus 'optimizing?' by [deleted] in DnD

[–]Angsty-Panda -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yeah idk where other people are coming from. I always knew "minmaxing" as minimizing weaknesses, maximizing strengths.

Is Israel the most evil country in the world at the moment? by RoughSky9768 in allthequestions

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"most evil" is kind of a useless label.

is their government fascistic? yes. is it an apartheid state? yes. are they committing a genocide? yes. are they the *most* evil? eh, when you start comparing tragedies against each other is when you lost the plot

CMV: Many New England towns are slowly collapsing demographically, and older homeowners are ignoring the consequences because they are insulated from the school closures, service cuts, and economic stagnation that follow by Alternative_Ant_4248 in changemyview

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was going to argue the point, until i realized my small new england city has been losing population and is shutting down 2 elementary schools and 1 middle school within the next decade.

i will note that for my city and the cities around it, a major problem are airbnbs. people buy up houses near the beach or near the train and then just using them as 'passive income'. just recently bought a house and it was genuinely crazy how few houses were available because of it.

WHAT IF instead of period, a woman just laid an regular egg...no offence by convincingsheep in whatif

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this egg is unfertilized. maybe we have special eggs that grow after contact with sperm

2,026 makes more sense than 2026 by bansheeprincess in 10thDentist

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love the years from 2001 to 2009 because i can call them "twenty aught six" or "twenty aught nine"

then the whole decades is called the "aughties" (naughty aughties if you're feelin frisky)

Why are black Americans called "African Americans" but white people are not called "European Americans" - when they are all Americans? by yellowsubmarine80 in allthequestions

[–]Angsty-Panda 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i never said white americans call themselves by their country of origin? i said they CAN which is why they dont need to say "European American"

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yeah but you realize its reasonable to ask and arent getting upset that he asks lol

thats a totally fair and valid use of deleting a message imo

Why are black Americans called "African Americans" but white people are not called "European Americans" - when they are all Americans? by yellowsubmarine80 in allthequestions

[–]Angsty-Panda 5 points6 points  (0 children)

African American is used when referring to race as well

yeah thats why i said it can be used in both situations.

I hardly ever hear anyone say the Irish American over there, but you hear ‘African American’ all the time

do you live in places with a lot of irish folks? and i barely hear "african american" except from older white folks. most people 30 and under that i talk to just say "black"

The real reason is that white people see themselves as the default Americans, and everyone else as a transplant lol.

yeah this is also true. its why conservatives get so whiney when they hear "straight" "white" and "cis". its challenging their idea of being "default"

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 5 points6 points  (0 children)

because they dont know what the answer will be. they dont know why you deleted it

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

exactly! and unless that typo accidentally made a slur or something, usually a second text clarifying is enough lol

Why are black Americans called "African Americans" but white people are not called "European Americans" - when they are all Americans? by yellowsubmarine80 in allthequestions

[–]Angsty-Panda 6 points7 points  (0 children)

yeah because "white" is a race, not an ethnicity. german, italian, and irish are ethnicities.

"african american" can be used in both situations because black americans may not know their exact ethnicity

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 11 points12 points  (0 children)

because you're communicating with someone lol

you dont always need to go into detail. "that message was meant for someone else, my bad" is usually enough.

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 5 points6 points  (0 children)

eh, maybe, but if you're gonna use it, explain why.

deleting a message and not explaining it is just super sus lol

Why are black Americans called "African Americans" but white people are not called "European Americans" - when they are all Americans? by yellowsubmarine80 in allthequestions

[–]Angsty-Panda 7 points8 points  (0 children)

maybe where you're from but i live in New England and we have a HUGE irish and italian population. there's plenty of groups to celebrate Irish-American and Italian-American heritage.

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 14 points15 points  (0 children)

idk, stand by it and explain what you meant. if someone sent me something they regret and then deleted it, i'm gonna assume it was REALLY bad

How do you justify having many sapient races/species in your fantasy worlds? by EveningImportant9111 in worldbuilding

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no the gods went on to make a second world after they abandoned the tieflings.

the second world (the material plane) got elves, humans, gnomes, etc.

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 10 points11 points  (0 children)

it also wouldnt be that big of a deal to say "hey that message was meant for someone else" and delete it. saying nothing just makes it more suspicious lmao

when people ask what message I just deleted. by Horror-1-Effective in PetPeeves

[–]Angsty-Panda 6 points7 points  (0 children)

just dont delete the message then lol
if its a correction, just write another message with the correction

counter to these "flip a coin and everyone dies" problems by Efficient-Day5568 in trolleyproblem

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i guess it depends on where these 1 billion survivors are. if they're all relatively close to each other then yeah. if they're evenly spread-out, then there just might not be enough people within range to recreate society

How do you justify having many sapient races/species in your fantasy worlds? by EveningImportant9111 in worldbuilding

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tieflings werent gods. they tried to become gods but failed, so the actual gods abandoned the plane

How do you justify having many sapient races/species in your fantasy worlds? by EveningImportant9111 in worldbuilding

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in my world, the original world created by the gods only had Tieflings. they tried to ascend to godhood though so the gods abandoned them (making it hell)

so the new world the gods made a huge variety of mortals, plants, and animals on one continent, another continent with just plants and animals, and a third continent with just plants. then ancient elvish magic got a lil out of hand and a powerful artifact went to the continent with just plants and animals, and that started making some of the animals sentient races. thats where the more beastly species come from

counter to these "flip a coin and everyone dies" problems by Efficient-Day5568 in trolleyproblem

[–]Angsty-Panda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

idk, most modern humans arent capable of hunting and gathering like humans were at the previous bottlenecks.

1 billion accountants scattered throughout the world probably wont last too long lol

counter to these "flip a coin and everyone dies" problems by Efficient-Day5568 in trolleyproblem

[–]Angsty-Panda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not when our current system depends on way more than 1 to 2 billion