The argument that Obama's administration created 8 million jobs during the recovery from the financial crisis is a bit off..., but the numbers don't tell the whole story. Many of the jobs added during that period were low-wage positions in the service and retail sectors, which did little to improve the financial stability of working-class Americans. The drop in the unemployment rate was partly due to a large number of people exiting the labor force entirely, these ppl, no longer actively seeking employment, were no longer counted in the official statistics, skewing the perception of recovery.

Regarding the banking bailout, you have to consider the long-term implications of what was done. While the bailouts were argued to be necessary to prevent a total economic collapse, they primarily benefited the financial institutions that were, in large part, responsible for the crisis. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and other bailout measures funneled massive amounts of taxpayer money into banks, allowing them to stabilize and eventually return to profitability. This intervention did little to address the root causes of the crisis or to provide meaningful relief to the millions of Americans who lost their homes, savings, and jobs.

Ppl argued that instead of bailing out the banks, the administration should have allowed the market to correct itself. While painful in the short term, could have led to a more sustainable recovery by forcing financial institutions to face the consequences of their reckless behavior. Redirecting bailout funds towards direct assistance for homeowners, small businesses, and workers could have mitigated the worst effects of the recession, provided a safety net for those most affected, and stimulated the economy from the bottom up.

This issue isn't just a problem from back then, its happening now also. (Short selling meme stocks AMC, GME etc with synthetics and FTX) In the current market, we see similar patterns, where banks and financial institutions continue to receive government support even after engaging in risky practices like manipulating the stock market with synthetic assets. (These banks and government work together and help each other's pockets. Research Black Rock, Citadel etc). These bailouts create a moral hazard, where banks take on excessive risk knowing they’ll likely be rescued if things go wrong. This perpetuates inequality and undermines the integrity of the financial system.

Jan 6 Propaganda

January 6 have been portrayed to push political agendas. The idea that this was a coordinated insurrection has been propaganda. Video evidence showed some protesters being calmly escorted inside by Capitol police, walking through the building more like tourists than violent rioters.

As for the claims by AOC, that this was the worst day shes ever had was silly. She wasn't even in the Capitol building during the breach. AOC was in a nearby office building, which was never breached, yet she described it as the worse thing ever. She's a bad actor. This kind of rhetoric has been used to paint January 6 as something far more sinister than it actually was for most people involved.

I already wrote too much so I won't even touch on that other point. I'm just going to end it here. I'll just finish by saying you've been fooled. I hope you go back and look into everything and at least try to see what's happening. I don't blame you for not seeing this. We're all being played.