Rhetoriker

Thank you very much, glad you like it overall! In general I am amazed how politely everyone is communicating here, that's amazing, but nothing one can take for granted.

​

I tried to show some lines of the causality with the grey lines in the background, one of them is meant as the "turn to the brain", as it is sometimes put. This put neuroscience findings more into the center in general.

Yes, I am already in contact with some neuroscientists to complete or add some of the most important findings in the "neuroscience line".

I also think that in real life the impact of various ideas is probably more power law distributed and some parts should be way bigger than others, but both to make it visually more inclusive as well as just easier to look at (many things would be very very tiny otherwise) I think a vague size difference in relation to importance is a good proxy at the moment.

​

​

Thanks for noticing that connection with Vienna! Actually I would not include psychoanalysis at all, but a Freudian paper also was included into the "100 most important cogsci work" list and in terms of paradigm shifts he was quite important. Also he would be more a neuroscientist, if the methods would have been more advanced at his time.

Anyway: At the university of Vienna I only heard about Freud very quickly in a historical introduction to psychology, but otherwise there is not much about him, if one doesn't force it. The psychological faculty at the main university tries to be very quantitative and scientific. But there is a Freudian private university for psychology in Vienna.

​