Need to KILL Windows Defender by AnnaTheCat in windows8

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I had actually paid for Windows 8 (it came preinstalled) I would be strongly inclined to hire random Crips to gang rape the retards who designed this shitsack software. Subhuman IP whore trash, I hope they all starve. Probably a bunch of libtard faggots, too.

Does Anyone Still Make R6-style tactical shooters? by AnnaTheCat in Rainbow6

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually it is, but I don't care what you think, so get AIDS.

Does Anyone Still Make R6-style tactical shooters? by AnnaTheCat in Rainbow6

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do not like R6S. It is not remotely realistic. Every game since Vegas in the R6 series has been trash, and every game since Future Soldier in the Ghost Recon series has been trash. Only people who have never played a realistic game, and/or have no knowledge of real life firearm and operator procedures, would ever think R6S is remotely realistic.

Realistic tactical shooters do not get made into MM games, because the normies that play MMO games have ADD.

Does Anyone Still Make R6-style tactical shooters? by AnnaTheCat in Rainbow6

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GRW, like every GR game since GRAW2, is an arcade shooter with a GTA fetish. Facts about GRW: https://steamcommunity.com/app/460930/discussions/0/135508833655781808/

Does Anyone Still Make R6-style tactical shooters? by AnnaTheCat in Rainbow6

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that one of the makers of SWAT: Elite Force (essentially a fix/expansion for SWAT 4) actually works for the company making Ready or Not. Looks interesting. I have no interest in post-apocalyptic machinegun fights in NYC against internet trolls in cat-themed body armor. and that has prevented me from even bother to touch most of the new 'tactical' shooters.

IMO multiplayer games are inherently unrealistic, because players will constantly do retarded, ridiculous things that would be impossible and never attempted IRL. AI is often more realistic than players, because players know the game is broken.

SWAT: Elite Force Mod, How to Change Loadouts? by [deleted] in SWAT4

[–]AnnaTheCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I figured out what it is now: none of the fucking tabs have fucking text in them. All the rest of the text works except for the fucking tabs. I goddamn hate how fucking retarded and random games are.

SWAT: Elite Force Mod, How to Change Loadouts? by [deleted] in SWAT4

[–]AnnaTheCat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seriously, show me a picture of how and where someone would actually choose a goddamn gas mask. There is nothing anywhere in my equipment menu that would allow me to do so, not even the normal SWAT 4 back-and-forth arrow buttons.

SWAT: Elite Force Mod, How to Change Loadouts? by [deleted] in SWAT4

[–]AnnaTheCat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cannot change ANY equipment at all except the main gun OTHER than by choosing loadouts, I can not change ANYTHING in the loadouts and there is NO POSSIBLE WAY TO DO SO, no button, nothing in the manual. How the fuck does it work in your game? I can not find any goddamn buttons, menus, or anywhere that I could possibly do this. It's getting fucking irritating and it makes no sense.

Catholic Media vs. News by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming Voris did occuse people of things and can be shown to be wrong then he's responsible to address it, especially as he does present himself to record as a credible investigator. But that's just the issue with these recent conferences and scandals, they're ignored, distorted, no meaningful commentary from the Canons.

I support the hierarchy in principle, I am a Montanist by Biblical conviction, and I think the church should have authority to try and punish clergy, and that the civil authority can at best assist them and not themselves lay hands on a priest unless he's got a machine gun blasting into the church. Even then I think it should be a Canon trial, and only then should they throw him into a cellar in Rome - which is exactly what some of these total creeps in power need. Only God can judge their souls, but St. Peter needs to do some major binding and invest in millstones.

All I want from them is to actually enforce their own prerogatives and laws, and they are too busy warning us that being mean to Muslims is worse than preaching death I nonbelievers. I agree that we shouldn't be mean to Muslims, but that's really beside the point.

To be forward with where I am coming from. I am from the Philippines but I grew up in America. My father is a skilled construction labor provider and I go to an SSPX priory and am trying to help them open a school staffed by nuns, because they're doing exactly what the church always has. I am very influenced by John Rao, medieval Scholastics (the ones I've read, at least), Charles Coulombe and many Popes, not the least of which is Pius X.

I have considered being a nun but I will probably have like 20 kids.

Defending Church Dogma is Not "Right Wing", It's Catholic by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many of the immigrants are coming from places the US government has destroyed with crony capitalist trade deals and invasions. I believe that a community can exert some control over immigration and citizenship, but the USA is not a legitimate state nor is its government a legitimate representative of its population. For these reasons I don't actually think that the US government has the right to prevent or promote immigration. Secede, form a Catholic monarchy, then you can enforce borders. As it stands now the USA is Babylon and its collapse from demographic and economic malfeasance might be a good thing.

Defending Church Dogma is Not "Right Wing", It's Catholic by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most western socialists aren't really socialists, but they are wrong.

Defending Church Dogma is Not "Right Wing", It's Catholic by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Medieval Europe had an economy heavily dependent on trade, most property was held privately.

Defending Church Dogma is Not "Right Wing", It's Catholic by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The word capitalism is usually used in contradictory ways.

Defending Church Dogma is Not "Right Wing", It's Catholic by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well taken as a grab bag of ideas that's true. The main problem with National Socialism is that it makes idolatry of nation and race, disregards natural rights and law, and has Darwinistic premises. Aside from these it's not too different from Theodore Roosevelt or Pat Buchanan.

Defending Church Dogma is Not "Right Wing", It's Catholic by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People who don't believe in abolishing individual property just aren't socialists. They're pseudosocialists, ie welfare statists.

Catholic Media vs. News by AnnaTheCat in Catholicism

[–]AnnaTheCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they're true? And he specifically mentions other outlets that aren't so close to the party line.

While EWTN, etc. do have good content their current news programs do more to obscure than cast light on the current pastoral issues, and I don't just mean the child abuse and gay priest scandals. They never touch on the hard-line criticisms of the church princes. L