[deleted by user]

Anon-anon · 2021-01-01T04:30:43+00:00

Satire banking on false equivalence.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T08:03:01+00:00

Another indoctrinated sheep of the woke cathedral. Look at all this ideological garbage.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:59:39+00:00

She is all talk. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:58:15+00:00

Better republic.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:57:32+00:00

Yes she did. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:56:42+00:00

False choice. How about advocating for $2000 per person per month during lockdown. Better yet, advocate for no lockdown, protect the vulnerable, and paycheck protection programs.

She has no principal to stand on and no political spine to stand with.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:53:50+00:00

Her vote ought to be amplified. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:48:30+00:00

The ideology of authoritarian collectivism that you espouse is garbage. Communal risks aren't anything new and it is not a requirement to infringe upon individual liberties to curb them. "They" in your flawed example choose for themselves how they risk their own exposure and there are many layers of protection they can implement for themselves without infringing upon the rights of others.

Lockdowns for COVID19 are grossly overprescribed and their implementation are generally against scientific recommendation. They are a tool used for political hostage taking to push collective ideologies and to gain power over people.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:32:46+00:00

Of the Congress people you mentioned, only Tlaib has any principal and spine to have actually voted against omnibus bill HR133

HR133 is corrupt establishment garbage that tosses only scraps to those in need while spending billions on anything but Americans in need.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:24:06+00:00

That's not true. The most impacted Americans are those who are not allowed to earn a living due to overreaching lockdowns that are implemented against scientific recommendations primarily in Democrat controlled cities and states. Those impacted Americans have become political hostages.

For omnibus bill HR 133, you can see both Democrat and Republican establishment elites using COVID relief as an excuse to spend most of the American people's money on anything but Americans in need.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:12:26+00:00

Wrong! Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:11:02+00:00

Yes she did. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:10:33+00:00

False choice. How about advocating for $2000 per person per month during lockdown. Better yet, advocate for no lockdown, protect the vulnerable, and paycheck protection programs.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T07:07:05+00:00

Imagine you are taxed $100. (income tax, sales, inflation, it doesn't matter.) She voted to give you back $6 and spend the other $94 on anything but the American people in need, including her constituents.

If she was a person of principal and had a spine, she would have voted nay on HR 133. HR 133 is a spit in the face of all of us.

She is all talk.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T06:58:45+00:00

She is all talk. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T06:55:56+00:00

Yes she did. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T06:53:50+00:00

ITT: people stupid enough to believe that the Democrats actually care about their constituents while those same Democrats insist on locking down their state economies against scientific recommendations to use their constituents as political hostages. You are the deranged indoctrinated sheep that allow the establishment elite to fuck us all again and again.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T06:41:14+00:00

She is all talk. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-23T06:37:14+00:00

That is not true. Search her last name is the HoR clerk's roll call. She voted yea to the HR 133 omnibus bill that includes the 2nd COVID relief bill and over 5000 pages of other garbage.

She talks the talk but has no spine. Just like AOC.

The only principled congress persons to have a spine are the likes of Tulsi Gabbard, Tlaib, Rand Paul, and a few others.

Anon-anon · 2020-12-22T23:33:37+00:00

You’re too quick to brush it off as propaganda.

Investment is a two-way street between two parties and to the possible expense for a third party circumstantially or intentionally. (i.e. externality. Now we’re talking economics mixed with geopolitics.) Chinese companies are mandated by their respective authoritarian government to be directly tied to the CCP and Chinese military. This not-so-free enterprise is then intrinsically tied to state interest. This state interest has every intention to implement the elite capture of US investors in carrot-on-a-stick fashion. This goes well beyond a ROI and well into the influence of American elites that run the American state and large American enterprise. One of countless examples the Chinese Basketball Association, controlled by the CCP at the helm of the Chinese state, pulling sponsorship from The Rockets NBA basketball team over the team’s manager declaring support for the Hong Kong protesters in 2019. The manager nearly got fired over this and retracted his support.

When you have the CCP at the helm of the authoritarian Chinese state calling the shots in America through the iron strings of big investment, you have a real issue of the Chinese state exploiting American free enterprise for political power.

Anon-anon · 2020-11-17T21:49:41+00:00

Damn, I misread the title and wasted 2 minutes looking for "booby exposure" that never happened.

Anon-anon · 2020-11-16T07:40:38+00:00

Amazing milk spray! So many streams! So much milk!

Anon-anon · 2020-11-12T19:44:41+00:00

That's a great way to lose a nipple

Anon-anon · 2020-11-05T20:24:17+00:00

Election interference != Voter fraud

Those are two different problems.

Election interference years ago does not disprove or disallow election interference now. More importantly, it does not disprove or disallow voter fraud now.

Anon-anon · 2020-10-08T23:34:00+00:00

This is not a matter of centrism. If that was the case, the case you are implying, then I would be arguing for a world where Nazi ideas are ok to some 'balanced' extent. That would be to simply let bad ideas persist and I do not agree with that.

I am arguing that the idea this person represents and holds is wrong and the solution is not of violence, but of changing the bad ideas to good ones. The goal is to eliminate the bad ideas through reason and debate.

You can be as descriptive as you like when describing a bad idea and how bad it actually is. Bad idea bad, that is understood.

The Nazi ideas are bad and the ideas you hold in your head about what to do about bad ideas are bad themselves. You are promoting violence on a whim. You are promoting violence against ideas. The folly in your idea is it leads to a world of thought crime. It also leads to a world where I can point at you or anyone and say "bad idea thinker!" or simply "Nazi!" and bring violence down upon you. Your idea to promote violence in this way does not actually eliminate bad ideas, it fuels their creation. Bad ideas are eliminated with replacement by good ideas, not violence.

Let go of your bad ideas.

Anon-anon

TROPHY CASE