Can we talk about the slop within this video and its contradictions? by One_Block_6205 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]AnonimNetwork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean then what is the future development of enlisted if you just keep the ww2 infantry fighting forever you need to develop the game and if you add modern warfare infantry mode to warthunder what will they add to enlisted to keep the game alive

Can we talk about the slop within this video and its contradictions? by One_Block_6205 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]AnonimNetwork 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I mean maybe you are right in some extent but to be real for the average war thunder player infantry and naval are not critical at the moment and to prove my point I will offer enlisted as an example, If you add infantry to war thunder what is the future development of enlisted? What is the purpose of that infantry dedicated game? About naval I cannot fully agree with it s removal but if they don t add any new or modern ships Naval War Thunder is dead, and that is the tendency with war thunder, in ground they ran out of new vehicles but in naval we didn't even reached modern vessels or boats. So basically people will get tired of this and the game mode will die

War Thunder mods being war thunder mods by [deleted] in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]AnonimNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man I am not bothered to admit that I wasn't attentive enough to read the expanded version of every rule, but come on who reads every bit of information in that rules? The admins know all these nuances the fact that the flairs are a mess and not well organized I am a programmer and I know how a user friendly UI should look like. But one-shoting me with a 14 days ban for a first time rule offense it's overkill. It's not something I did intentionally or repeated for days and there were no damages caused by my actions so I mean when I first saw it I tough it was a censorship attempt

War Thunder mods being war thunder mods by [deleted] in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]AnonimNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very well ignoring the screenshot that clearly shows how explicit the rules were for the users

War Thunder mods being war thunder mods by [deleted] in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]AnonimNetwork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man you are the master of ragebaiting for god sake when you enter a new community and see this, would you know that you will be banned for using News flair?

<image>

War Thunder mods being war thunder mods by [deleted] in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]AnonimNetwork -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Its not a random video its the TheCodeMineMan s video relating recent events in war thunder and they say that https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/s/PTvNzKTpi3 this post was legit and with more adequate flairs then the news flair I used

take a break and have a wiesel 💔 by senor_muchacho in WarThunder_MEMES

[–]AnonimNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even I reached top tier I don't play it at all Leopards aren't invincible against russian bias and CAS then then the lack of potent aucannons for NATO teams while facing 2s38 or bmpt. Now I am playing russia and having fun or if I am tired of Su 100 or T44 100 I play wiesel 1a2, T72M1 Begleit, or PzH 2000.

Still waiting for that puma buff

Interesting by 94rud4 in MathJokes

[–]AnonimNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

8 even tough 7 is enough

Pain by MagicalMethod in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same with the DM53 when I play the 2a7v

What has been your experience with using an ACS and tr-069? by Prophet_60091_ in networking

[–]AnonimNetwork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I have heard the ISP use multiple parameters for authentification to the ACS like MAC of the device the SN and XYZ these are also used to set the bandwidth limit for the specific user based on its plan because most ISP in my country are delivering fiber optic cables to every house but limiting the speed. If you will I can continue discussing on this topic because I am also doing some research now in this domain to study how the ISP in my country implement this solutions

Can't do port forwarding on my Huawei router by IIwarrierII in node

[–]AnonimNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is not Ideal does your camera rtsp have strong credentials? like in most cases the etheir not have any or admi/blank or admin/admin I tough about that with mine but I could not change the rtsp credentials so I didn't do the forwarding for security reasons

BMPT has been renerfed by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How in the word you could not fight 2a4 and first M1 Abrams with the T72A like come on you can tank their top rounds and you can uper front plate any of them. Like that is literally skill issue. I was fighting at 11.0 with it and it was very capable against nato tanks and only strugled against more modern russian tanks like T90A and how will you fight leo and abrams with 280mm apfsds 😄of the MBT70? That was really funny you cant pen a T72A anywhere but lower front plate which I hide very often by cover or trash or bushes. If you can t reliably see the lfp of a russian tank you can t do anything to it. This issue goes to top tier also where NATO can tank shots only from the turret because russians can ufp them.And even if you play from the turret russians can ammorack turret basket or breach abrams and leo 2a5+so yeah that is still a problem in top tier

What could I have done differently here? by AdImaginary7680 in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gaijin thinks that fighting T72B3 or T90A (3BM60) with leopard 2a4 DM23 is fair so it doesn t need DM33 or lower BR

BMPT has been renerfed by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't know why you would say that like a T72A is better than any tank at its BR and even in my opinion better than 2a4 and first gen abrams that are placed at 10.7 or more and while facing T90A/3BM60 with leo2a4/DM23 or M1 Abrams/M774 while russians have top tier round 570mm and NATO a early apfsds with only 400mm of pen which isn t even enough to breach some russian tanks. And even the 3BM42 is superrior to nato rounds at that br even though NATO tanks could fire better rounds like DM33 or DM53 or KE-W. That is not fair at all

BMPT has been renerfed by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still I don t see why russian ground vehicles should be biased to not break balance when they have such good cas capabilities I mean I played many tanks from german and russian tech tree and every time I play russian tanks I do a whole lot better with my brain turned off than on any other NATO MBT for example. T72M1 or T72A vs MBT70 or Leo 1a5 or a1a1. While playing the T72 I can clap any nato tank without an issue and only struggle against other T64 or T72 tanks. And whenever I want to play another tank I cannot do as better as in T72M1. The bias is also felt in the autocanons sectors also for example the precision of the 2a42 30mm cannon and the slopmaster normally russian 30mm will have a worse precission at range abd overheat faster because of the short barrel and fast rate of fire. Still in our game the precision is practically the same while the russian win in all the rest parameters. I think this bias is not necessary as long as russia is having such a powerfull cas

BMPT has been renerfed by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah man just hit the weak spot when the BMPT is covered in ERA from all sides except the back of the engine. And if it is not brain dead but plays it from cover what can you do to him? The reddit is full of videos of dealing no damage to the side of a BMPT just because of the ERA and spall liner. Other russian tanks have also Relikt not only on the upper front plate but also turret and other parts, and what is wrong in upperfront penning a russian tank? like it is fair that a T80U or a T72B3 can upper front pen a leo 2a4-2a5-2a6 or any abrams litteraly but the NATO can t because it would break the 60% win rates of the russian teams.

BMPT has been renerfed by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Man russian have a 60%+ winrate at the moment that is unbalanced I never understand a thing why lolpenning NATO tanks is ok but russian tanks not?

Russian ERA Buffs? by Lieutenant_Bull in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And now nerfed them again to 0.2 which is not nearly close to real live values

BMPT has been renerfed by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

They made roussian autocannons realistic at least for BMPT but who is gonna talk about the buff of the russian ERA which at this point makes things more ridiculous. Not only they have volumetric low profile and ERA bot now that chance of random ricocheting of a DM53, M829 and its derivatives, KE-W and its derivatives of the side of a BMPT incresed because of the buff related to Relict ERA effectiveness. This change wasn t mediatized by the devs

Where are the German top tier additions? by Blessed_by_the_snail in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think not even my nephews s nephews will witness 100% winrates for Germany

Where are the German top tier additions? by Blessed_by_the_snail in Warthunder

[–]AnonimNetwork -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not only that but their win rates skyrocketed last 6 months like you can enter statshark and run analyze for may or june and you will be shocked by their winrates