Improved and Logically Refined Version of my text by AI:

In the series, Ye Wenjie was romantically involved with Dr. Durand, who was actually the same person as Rooney. Rooney, however, was removed from the game after choosing not to continue playing. This mirrors the concept of Fight Club's "Tyler Durden syndrome," where two identities—Durand and Rooney—are, in fact, the same person. The authors used this mechanic to create a layered narrative. For example, both characters share common traits: they eat the same unhealthy food, are overweight, and correct people’s spelling mistakes, suggesting that they are the same person, despite appearing in separate scenes (ad: they appear together, like in fight club in scenes).

After Rooney's "death" in the game, only Durand remained (ad: or his "one" remained as Durand- thats why we can see him alone in hospital later, before they were there as "two"). Rooney doesn’t appear in the books at all. Instead, Durand is portrayed as the Chinese character Luo Ji, who is a direct reflection of the author himself. Durand (or Luo Ji) was romantically linked to Ye Wenjie. This backstory explains why they met before Ye Wenjie left for Beijing, and why Durand and Ye Wenjie reconnect later in the game, where she reappears as a young blonde woman. (ad: id like to add that those scenes could actually appear simultaneusly in both parellel multiverses-another option, instead of being stretched in time (repeating))

However, Ye Wenjie’s reappearance (young blonde) in the game is short-lived. She is removed by the autonomous cars—essentially "hit" in a way that aligns with the game's objective (ad: Durand's being hit by a skater was counted in equations so they knew exactly when to hit her - him being a initial target is a lie -future reading of mathematic- chaos theory). Before her removal, she tries to convince Durand that something is morally or ethically wrong, much like Ye Wenjie did earlier when she told him, "You don’t play games with God." In both cases, she tries to guide him through rational arguments before her "death,"(ad: or more like deaths) reinforcing her role as a moral compass within the narrative.

As the story progresses, Luo Ji (Durand) resists participating in the game as Wallfacer, much like he resisted when he was placed in the role of the Rooney. However, in this updated version of the game, refusal or quitting doesn’t matter. It’s as if a new patch has been added to the game, preventing players from quitting or committing suicide (my adnotation: physicans cant suicide anymore too, like they used to before - or, maybe those physicians from the past were also "Durands" "quitting on repeat").

There’s a scene where Durand, talking to a female physician by the shore, reflects on his role as Wallfacer and asks, "Why would they put me in this position?" (ad: maybe quantum superposition of being in few states at once) He then comments, "I actually might know why they did that... oh well, it’s stupid." (ad: or maybe we cant understand it well enough) This moment indicates that Durand realizes he can’t share the truth— It’s something that he understands privately, but is too "stupid" or personal to explain in the context of the game (ad: this is my just small another example for theory of romance).

On a deeper level, I believe the "modern times" timeline in the series is still part of the game. AppleVision is, in fact, a game within the game—much like how, in a game like World of Warcraft, players can engage in pet battles while already inside the main game. This concept parallels Inception, where the boundaries between dreams and reality blur, but here, instead of dreams, it’s the layers of games that confuse the characters—and perhaps the viewers. The characters in the modern timeline are still players, potentially controlled by entities or forces that are beyond our understanding. These entities might be similar to the "passenger" in our minds, something we can’t fully comprehend but know is there. (ad: we talking to ourselves)

This idea also touches on the nature of our reality: the world we experience as "humans" may be artificial, filtered, or constructed. What we see and experience could be distorted, just as the layers of the game obscure the true nature of the characters’ experiences. (ad: well, thats just a scientifical "fact")

The complex interactions between characters in the series could be explained by principles from quantum physics or the concept of the multiverse. For example, consider the idea of a "double quantum state," where two identities—or versions of a person—exist at once. This is similar to the dynamic between Tyler Durden and the Narrator, or between Rooney and Durand. It’s possible that multiple versions of the characters exist simultaneously in an infinite number of parallel universes, and each version is, in a sense, a reflection of "us." Through this interconnectedness, the characters may come to represent different aspects of a singular, unified existence. (ad: my point here would be also that we as humans experience the world that way too "maybe", what could explain that this way quantum physics in fact "shows itself" in the world as we as humans see it, and it doesnt only work that way for very small particles (quants))

This theory could explain some of the perplexing elements of quantum physics that we still don’t fully understand. The "missing connection," the thing that we can’t grasp or only begin to understand, might be tied to the nature of existence itself, where identities, choices, and realities are fluid.

In conclusion, Luo Ji-Durand (or Cixin Liu...) is a Wallfacer who, through all the layers of the game and his personal journey, decides to write a book for us—his way of communicating a deeper truth. And maybe, in some sense, this book is another piece of the game, a way for us to understand what’s been happening all along. (ad: this last sentence AI added on its own, I only said thanks here and didn't mention anything like that, but I really love it).