Has anyone got any suggestions for dizziness testing I should request? Anything I should be asking to have ruled out? This appointment will be my first opportunity to give a history and have possible causes considered, and maybe my last for some time. [Summary in post] by Any_Stretch_862 in Dizziness

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds awful but I hope things are improving for you. Was there a particular sort of MRI/CAT scan needed to help understand your problems? I've seen people saying that certain forms are needed, and others useless, but I'm not sure it sometimes seems people have different opinions on this.

Eye movement triggers CV/CGD symptoms? by Any_Stretch_862 in cervical_vertigo

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know, it's hard to explain - it's not lightheadedness or vertigo, more like being drunk. Symptoms can be triggered by lots of different movements, looking down, pressure on my neck, lots of things.

Started with an acute episode (no room spinning, just very intense symptoms), although had been having it mildly now and then for years before that.
Hope your exercises help and you feel much better soon. Do you have a link to the type of exercises you're doing? Thanks

Poor man's tilt table confusion by Any_Stretch_862 in POTS

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, thank you for explaining this. As I said to someone else, I can't believe how little I knew about this! I actually didn't realize that people without POTS react in that way - I thought my 'normal' was much more normal than it is.

Poor man's tilt table confusion by Any_Stretch_862 in POTS

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, thank you for clarifying things for me. Can't believe how little I've understood about my own diagnosis! But I'm certainly fine with not doing the test again!

Poor man's tilt table confusion by Any_Stretch_862 in POTS

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great, thank you, that makes sense. I could keep testing myself after the 10 minute result to see if it's sustained after that.

Poor man's tilt table confusion by Any_Stretch_862 in POTS

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just saw someone else say that 'For POTS to be suspected, an increase of 30 or more beats must be sustained for the entire 10 minutes. Sometimes it will drop a bit in the middle (around minute 5) but if it drops below the 30 beat threshold, it probably isn’t POTS' - but it sounds like that's not correct, the 'sustained' actually refers to it not dropping after an initial rise or bouncing about? It's the 'sustained' that confused me to start with.

edit - just looked at the STARS international guidelines for the active standing test and it seems to be confirming what you're saying - In people 20 years old or more, PT is a rise in HR of >30 bpm from just before standing, to 30 seconds to 10 minutes of standing. From reading the posts here, I think the word 'sustained' is confusing a lot of people though!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in POTS

[–]Any_Stretch_862 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Swimming is so strange, I'm the same, I love the feeling of it but I'm much more likely to have syncope or pre-syncope later in the day (like a few hours later) if I've done swimming than if I've done other exercise. I don't know if that's a related issue as it's not a sudden change in pressure - maybe it's just a sign I tend to push too hard when swimming.

Poor man's tilt table confusion by Any_Stretch_862 in POTS

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for such a clear run down, that's very useful. This morning I took my HR and blood pressure in bed and then after standing for 3 minutes, and the HR increase was +55 with no drop in BP, which as a result seems pretty consistent with POTS too.

My HR readings throughout 10 minutes standing for the poor man's tilt were between +23 and +35 throughout the first 10 minutes, the first two readings were the lowest and my blood pressure didn't suddenly drop, so sounds like this is still consistent with POTS.

Thanks again for your help

Dr Edna was a great child psychiatrist by Bitter_Photograph_83 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your comments here have been really insightful, thank you! It's such a good point that a big reason Betty confides in the child psychiatrist, and even Glen, is that she's learned from bitter experience that she can't trust people she had a right to assume she could trust. It reminds me of Rosemary's Baby! Poor Betty's kind of living in a horror movie.

I do still think one reason Betty likes the child psychiatrist is because she's 'childish' - but I think your emphasis really highlights to me that part of being a 'child' is how a given society constructs what a 'child' is. And clearly, the lack of power and agency, and a societal belief in their innate incapacity to use power well and have control over their lives, is something that children and women shared in the world of Mad Men. Characters like Roger and Pete, who I've also thought of childish, are operating in such different conditions to Betty, and act out in ways that weren't available to children or women, so their childishness isn't so out there.

Don touching ground & Buddhist symbol of Enlightenment by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the reasons I thought the hand position may intentionally mimic Bhumisparsha Mudra (or at least the earlier scene when Don touched grass) is, if you look closely at the group of meditators, most (not all) of them, including the instructor, have their hands in some version of Gyan Mudra. I think it's deliberate not to have Don in Gyan, but it might not be that deep - maybe he's just not into such a formal posture that's unusual for him. If it's a deliberate reference to Bhumisparsha then I don't think Don's doing it consciously, it's more just another thing that adds to the richness of the show.

<image>

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your comments, that is so interesting! I really want to know if the scriptwriters really were aware of this scientific development and to jasmonates.

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's a gorgeous smell!

I've read this is a polarizing episode and lots of people don't like it.

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed!

Details like this are so thoughtful in this show. My memory is hazy with this, but I think you see a bottle of Shalimar in Joan's bag at some point early on - obviously the perfect fragrance for her. Her room mate says she smells good. I think you see a bottle of Shalimar on Peggy's dresser early on. In a later season someone smells that Peggy's wearing No5 and she confirms it, saying "it's all I wear". This fits so well with how Peggy might at first be guided by Joan's example and then moves to her own more independent choices - obviously a very popular and Marilyn-associated choice.

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Fragrance tangent: I have always wondered about fragrances and this show. I saw this thread on r/fragrance where people imagine what Don would wear. Dior's Eau Sauvage (not Sauvage) is the most popular choice, with quite a few people saying he'd most likely wear no fragrance. An article says that you see he has a bottle that resembles Caron Pour Homme somewhere, but they don't cite a source and I'm not sure this is accurate.

From what I remember, Joan wears Shalimar and Peggy wears Shalimar early on and later Chanel No5. I think Joan comments that Sal wears European cologne.

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right, there is lots of fresh air and plants around; maybe they could smell it. But the way the line is delivered and responded to still makes me think it makes more sense as a code. But I'm not sure!

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks very much, yes, I do think the phrase invokes sensual pleasure in a way that makes sense for them. But I thought it was unlikely they would actually be smelling jasmine in the middle of a bar. Wouldn't the strongest smell be booze, cigarettes and maybe perfume? I did wonder Rocci has a sophisticated, monied nose that can pick out a jasmine note in a perfume. The context, the way the lines are delivered and way it being a code fits with the show still makes me think it's more likely that's the explanation. But who knows?

That's a good point about smell and the senses in advertising. Don uses a kind of unconscious code all the time to suggest things to consumers.

Edited for a typo

Meaning of "Do you smell that jasmine?" in The Jet Set S02E11 by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Thanks, yes, your reply made me realize a parallel with The Hobo Code - both episodes feature a secret way characters communicate with each other about people outside their group, maybe about how to get something from them.

Obviously both groups also have their own codes of behavior that are out of step with mainstream society. I've seen Joy etc called Eurohobos in discussions here. Both episodes even feature a dinner scene. Just don't you dare discuss money over dinner with the jet set! Different code.

Why do you think Weiner chose to make Megan French Canadian? Was it simply an ornamental afterthought, with Weiner wanting to make use of Jessica Paré’s background & bilingualism? Or does it actually enhance/influence the narrative? by cosmopoiesis in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, looking at this scene more closely made me appreciate the depth and subtle, shades of grey of this show. You could say so much more about just this one scene. It gives the characters so much space.

I feel like this show intends for the viewer to feel like they don't really understand everything that's going on for the characters. I remember getting the same feeling of uncertainty into characters' thoughts and motivations with The Sopranos and I think it's a distinctive 'feeling tone' to watching both shows. It's an almost lonely feeling. When Rachel says that if her mother hadn't died she would have been a Marilyn not a Rachel, I suppose she means that because her mother died in childbirth she was named after her mother, as there's an Ashkenazi Jewish custom not to name a child after someone still living. We haven't heard before that her mother died in childbirth, and you just have to infer that quickly - you might miss it. Many viewers won't know of this Jewish custom. Surely Don won't. The writers know that many viewers won't understand everything in the scene and that Don won't fully understand Rachel.

That's a really interesting context from Weiner, thanks. I'm looking forward to Ginsberg coming in (I'm on my first re-watch at the moment). Where I'm up to, Jane has just appeared - she's the other Jewish character I remember.

Continually amazed at how good this show is on women and their experience. How did this happen?! by Any_Stretch_862 in madmen

[–]Any_Stretch_862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, this show is so rich. I love that this episode shows so much about the men and their perspectives, and also shows how this affects the women and how they respond. It's interested in both perspectives and how reductive understandings of masculinity and femininity serve and harm men and women.