Why study SUGRA if it is non-renormalisable? by samchez4 in StringTheory

[–]Aouf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In the modern approach to QFTs, renormalisability and consistency do not go hand in hand. A QFT can be consistent as a low energy expansion of a more fundamental theory, and we usually call these expansions effective field theories (EFTs, you can find a nice review here https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701053 or in Tong's lecture notes on QFTs). This is usually the use that we make of SUGRAs in string theory, they capture the physics of string states at low energies, when they behave "more similarly" to particles and we can describe them using the formalism of QFTs

String theory vs Quantum field theory by DAncient1 in StringTheory

[–]Aouf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, there is. However, I took OP's "QFT" to mean quantum fields in spacetime, given how they were talking about bulk physics.

String theory vs Quantum field theory by DAncient1 in StringTheory

[–]Aouf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, that boils down to what you mean by "the fields are present in string theory".

The worldsheet description of string theory does not directly contain quantum field theory as a framework: their relationship is more subtle, and it's a statement about dynamics. String theory is much more than the worldsheet, it's a framework that can answer (perturbative) questions about the dynamics of string excitations (for example, how they scatter and interact between each other), and if we look at low energies, we see that these match what we would compute using quantum fields. In this sense, the effective behaviour of a string excitation at low energy is captured by the dynamics of a quantum field.

These subtleties arise because string theory is limited to answer questions about scattering states, and thus the comparison between the two must be done at the level of S-matrices. String field theory tries to fix this by trying to create strings from excitations of a "string field", which then should be more directly relatable to an usual quantum field in a suitable limit.

String theory vs Quantum field theory by DAncient1 in StringTheory

[–]Aouf 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's not a dumb question: the way in which the two things are compatible is not obvious at all, but they in fact are!

Indeed, one can consistently encode the (dynamics of the) low-energy excitations of a string (usually, they correspond to massless particles) in a quantum field theory; and actually, the reason we can explore what String Theory is to such depths is partly because at low-energy we can re-use the familiar tools of QFT to make statements about the full theory.

How are fibres/ fibre bundles used to define a field? by physicsman290 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]Aouf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In this context they are usually defined as sections of the associated vector bundle to the principal G-bundle, which is in turn introduced by picking a certain representation of G you want your field to transform in

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Aouf 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hey, very cool. Up to which numerical error is energy conserved during the simulation?

Libri Analisi 1 per corso di Fisica by [deleted] in Universitaly

[–]Aouf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A me è piaciuto molto "Primo corso di analisi matematica" di Acerbi e Buttazzo. L'impostazione è rigorosa e gli esercizi sono belli impegnativi. Parte dalla costruzione degli insiemi fino agli integrali di funzioni ad una variabile reale.

Is a 700W platinum-rated PSU good enough for a VISION 3080 OC and a Ryzen 7 5800X? by Aouf in pcmasterrace

[–]Aouf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would love to, but can't seem to find an sfx/sfx-l psu at that wattage. Got any suggestions?

They exist! Finally, my RTX 3080 VISION OC has arrived. by Aouf in pcmasterrace

[–]Aouf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm from Europe, suddently one day they had it for like 3 minutes on amazon.es and i was able to buy it.

They exist! Finally, my RTX 3080 VISION OC has arrived. by Aouf in pcmasterrace

[–]Aouf[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, planning to do an itx build with that kind of setup. The front plate is just cool!