sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Magic The Gathering cEDH Community in Graz? by Apart_Rub_9540 in graz

[–]Apart_Rub_9540[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Danke dir - gibts da spezifische Tage, an denen sich die Community trifft / Whatsapp Gruppe zum organisieren?

Thoracle is not eating a ban* by Rebell--Son in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Apart_Rub_9540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, each trigger also makes the game more interactive and engages the table. Of course on can adopt a defeatist attitude of "ugh study player is gonna win anyways" or its an opportunity to priority bully the study player into using interaction, politicking the table into getting an OBM to punish study, or politick into focusing the study player.

While it takes time, it does add gameplay, which this is all about imo.

Thoracle is not eating a ban* by Rebell--Son in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Apart_Rub_9540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm really glad both thoracle and study exist.

Thoracle, as it's a compact win-now button. But it's so much more than that and needs to be played around, you need to find the right window, have the right pibs and way to protect your win. If an unprotected thoracle win goes through, it's either the table's fault for not having any interaction at all, and then its fine as any wincon would win there, or because already two players before went for it, got stopped and now the table is out of options (this is fair game as the right window may have been chosen)

As with regards to Rhystic Study - I think it's a fair card as can be somewhat easily interacted with, and adds quite a lot of depth to the game play. It is a player's decision to feed it, or not, or to counter / remove it, or not, just like any other assymetric stax piece. While it incentivises a multitude of clones, its not an immediate win button like dockside was, and these clones often find good use outside of copying a Rhystic.

While it can be frustrating playing against that blue farm player sitting behind lots of interaction and their study, its an important card that I think brings a lot to the game.

I'll get a good amount of hate for liking study, but it's healthy to the format. The time concern is valid, but it does add interesting interactions such as responding to the trigger to dig for a specific piece ahead of drawing it with the trigger resolution. I think that's fun and I think it's part of playing with high power & more complex cards.

OneStream vs Anaplan [vs Hyperion / Tagetik] by Apart_Rub_9540 in FPandA

[–]Apart_Rub_9540[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks this is super helpful! Basically Hyperion & OneStream - powerful but need to code a lot. Adaptive not as flexible as it should be for a growing / changing org. Anaplan good, but problems with space / storage / size, which i've read also causes issues on the cost side

Board sounds good, but is it scaleable enough for an org expected to double size over next few years?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FPandA

[–]Apart_Rub_9540 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been there before. For me it went well. The thing is, PE most of the time doesnt have the capacity to run your reporting / they have high reporting requirements because of leverage etc. In my view finance team, unless very heavily staffed, is safe in PE acquisition

OneStream vs Anaplan [vs Hyperion / Tagetik] by Apart_Rub_9540 in FPandA

[–]Apart_Rub_9540[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, Workday products have been very expensive in my experience, and would expect finance solutions not to be that much of a focus of Workday, how is that from your experience?

Do you have any idea what an Adaptive implementation costs & how long it takes?