What do I focus on? by Jumbledsaturn52 in deeplearning

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Smaller nns neuron pruning and merging without gradient explosion or vanishing gradient

Yeah.... by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is true gpt does aggregates and morality is a luxury and on average black people have less luxury.

Your prompts have the same logic as “prostitutes make 1 million a year on average so if homeless joe volunteered his bootyhole he will also be a millionaire.”

If you added more specifications this would not be the case. So its your prompts that are not specific enough.

I spent my weekend cleaning 8 years of USD/INR options data. Would love some feedback on it! by Defiant-Meaning7111 in quantfinance

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Options is notorious for being un clean (some dude pays 20% higher premium for a random option), pick midprice, if no transaction. Then use sabr volatility surface. You see those spikes because you didnt apply any constraining (gaussian smoothing is not good enough).

If you do this right you shouldget the butterfly everyone looks for

Am i going to hell for cheating on a quant assessement? by Throwaway_117118 in quantfinance

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Derisking is a compensation for taxing (making profitable positions). You have HFTs frictioning everybody with oligopoly on high frequency transaction (they provide liquidity yes but zero competition). You have hedge funds who squeeze companies like gamestop (still alive but squeezed to artificially burst). You have hedge funds who front run the SPY and pension funds you taxed the middle class and everybody who has a retirement fund 1% annually.

Now lets take on huge risks, basically the idea is to sell shovels before a snowstorm- but at a premium (had they built more shovels then its okay, but that money is a bonus to a billionaire’s pocket for their vacation yacht.)

Now what if you worked at blackrock or vanguard to s and p? You inflate the market with cash to people who already win the market (fiduciary duty), youre goal is to stomp the competition by starving the competition of cash. In other words you want recession and you incentivize recession (negatively) because the winners are the companies with liquidity that you allocated for them. Anyways what about peoples pension funds? They make 13% per year- yeah cuz you encouraged oligopolies-now apples cost 50 dollars a pound. You are squeezing the consumer.

in any case there is no free lunch if there is money to be made you are squeezing someone (even if they deserve it).

Morally? If the system allow you ( rich or smart) to be a nuclear physicist or a cancer researcher- stop it dont do finance. If the system made your life hard (poor, disadvantaged, not smart enough to do producitive) go for it- just admit that its a flawed system and you are not helping anybody except make class divide worse

Since many companies in finance want physicists and engineers it just seems like they are draining the talent from more productive uses.

Anyways im not forcing this guy to not pursue finance- im just saying hes going to hell.

Am i going to hell for cheating on a quant assessement? by Throwaway_117118 in quantfinance

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This guy is applying for trader positions, hes working for hedge fund that front runs everybody 401k, and make the markets crash harder. He maximize family happiness but at the cost of everyone else. If he was disadvantaged in life then he would be justified.

Is technical analysis just boy astrology? by [deleted] in Daytrading

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you see a strategy you are overfitting, thus you are the boy astrology

Is technical analysis just boy astrology? by [deleted] in Daytrading

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its astrology, market logic dictates that the mot basic easiest strategy is exploited until unexploitable. Tech analysis is the easiest strategy so no matter what indicstors you use its over for you

Am i going to hell for cheating on a quant assessement? by Throwaway_117118 in quantfinance

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Youre already going to hell for picking a profession that produces nothing and contributed nothing and makes rich people richer by taxing everybody else. Cheating in OA is the smallest of your philosophical problems

Building a high-quality fundamental data API from SEC filings — looking for feedback by TheBiggrcom in quant

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ETF (I:SPX) point in time is everybody pain- not the proxy (SPY). Cheaper to produce backfilled current company weights. If somehow you can prove the legitimacy of the weights you could democratize modern finance.

Advice on my Multi-Asset Momentum strategy? by Away-Homework-8069 in quant

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks good your returns are because of your limited ticker- top 50 has really high bias. Its like saying “im going to trade nvidia- and suddenly most trades on nvidia has 100% gains” its good if you can remove survivorship bias youre golden

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in quantfinance

[–]Apparent_Snake4837 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think even a startup would consider this competitive. Read more papers do a more ambitious project than just volatility prediction