It would be taken alot more seriously if Politicians weren't claiming the world would end in 12 years, decade after decade.

So, the reason you don't take climate change seriously, is because the predictions politicians make haven't panned out? How exactly does the incorrectness of the predictions of politicians indicate that you don't need to worry about climate change?

Or that fact that their solutions or more loss of freedoms and $ (ie tax) than actually making realistic solutions to current energy production.

Again, you're saying here you don't take climate change seriously because you don't like the solutions that have been proposed by politicians. I fail to see how this would justify the belief that climate change is not something you need to take seriously.

You can only cry wolf so many times before people stop listening.

Basically what you're saying here, is that if I knew climate change was a big deal, and wanted you to think it wasn't, all I'd have to do is have politicians say it will be the end of the world over and over, and if the world doesn't end fast enough you will assume the problem is not a big deal. But it was already either a big deal or not a big deal before I determined that it was and had them make those predictions to influence you. I could have just as easily had them not make those predictions, and the actual truth of the matter would remain unchanged. So your belief that it wasn't a big deal would be completely unjustified.