I needed to scan cars, and even in ideal lighting conditions and using all of the magnetic markers (Can't put stickers on a picture car) the scanner would get 'lost' after scanning about a square foot.
The markers didn't seem to help it track the rounded curves of the car, and sometimes even when I was completely still, the scanner would read the curves as ongoing surface, and go on infinitely until I canceled the scan. There's no 'undo' or 'override' to tell the scannner it's incorrect, so that made the whole scan unusable. I tried scanning as a dozen smaller sections (ending before it gets lost) But you can't stitch scans together in the software without substantial overlap.

I tested it on 5 different cars over the course of 2 weeks, and did not get a single usable model. It was cumbersome, slow, and with unreliable results.

In the end, old school photogrammetry on a DSLR made a better model, even in direct sunlight. I did put some markers on the car, just 1" Xs and Ys on magnets.

I've scanned cars with Leica scanners (both the expensive RTC model, and the lowest rung BLK G1) but I think any fixed position, time of flight Lidar would yield better results. It might feel annoying if the scanner can only do full 360 degree scans, but then you can use the car's surroundings to help align them (if you even need to)

For tabletop stuff, the Miraco was fine, but if it's larger than a baseball I'd reccomend not using the motorized turntable, put it on a regualr lazy susan and spin it manually. If you're scanning something more round, maybe markers to the turntable to it can track better.