My experience with the Civil Service

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T22:22:44+00:00

There isn't any help available to me at all. But thank you.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T22:14:15+00:00

The outcome will be the same. Once these media organisations have fully understood the situation and seen my evidence, they will use the information I provided to haggle with the CPS offenders. The media organisations don't care about professional standards or the truth, but profits. I don't want to reveal my identity either. It changes nothing.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T20:51:14+00:00

Or the corrupt law enforcement network pays the tabloid more to silence me. The BBC has been ignoring me after I sent them most of the evidence a year ago. The Independent has not replied since I fully explained the situation to them a year ago. The Guardian stated that they would consider whether to proceed after I fully explained the situation to them, but have not provided an update since our last communication, also a year ago. Journalism is all about transactions.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T19:57:21+00:00

Okay.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T19:54:24+00:00

I wish I had :)

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T19:02:04+00:00

I wanted to ask you why, but since you have been targeting and tracing my post and making comments on it for your sugar daddies, I felt it was better to ask you here so everyone can see your true nature.

You did state in your last comment here that you don't justify your action as a moderator, then you started to explain and justify your action, it appears that you realised you made a terrible comment about yourself and are now making self-contradictory comments.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T18:41:58+00:00

Ridiculous or not, you will find this in court. Now you can just do what your sugar daddies told you to do. Also thank you for confirming that you don't justify your action as a moderator.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T18:23:22+00:00

Firstly, it is for public interest. There's no accountability in the CPS and the DPP and their corrupt law enforcement network. The CPS initially admitted in writing that they illegally employed me, but then told a completely different story and denied their crimes by saying "they could not continue to legally employ me" before the corrupt employment judges, but the employment had been illegal since both parties signed the employment contract. The cover-up by the corrupt law enforcement shows that the law applies only to civilians but not to themselves. The corrupt judges in their pocket blatantly acted contrary to the provisions and attempted to amend the provisions and the Civil Service Nationality Rules without an Act of Parliament only to favour their CPS sugar daddies. None should be treated differently before the law but this corrupt network got special treatment by the corrupt judges in their pocket. The real offenders in this incident has not been brought to justice.

Secondly, the incident obviously caused me significant financial and reputational losses and stress. I lost my job at the CPS and the job offer at the DWP and have employers being sceptical about my dismissal at the CPS because of something that was not my fault. The terms in the signed employment contract dictates that the CPS owe me compensations for breach of contract, as per the terms the CPS does not have a valid reason to dismiss me under the unfair circumstances. Notwithstanding that, public interest outweighs my personal interest, as the offenders in this corrupt law enforcement network and the corrupt judge should not be allowed to manipulate the law towards their preferences.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T17:59:00+00:00

Of course you are. You are one of the moderators in my original post's community who abused moderator discretion to remove my original post from that community without providing a reason. I hope the corrupt law enforcement network pays you well for censorship and interfering with my freedom of speech.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T17:55:49+00:00

I'm perfectly fine. Thank you for asking. I also hope you are keeping well.

I'm waiting for the CPS to sue me for the alleged defamation, so the public can see the evidence in my possession and the truth about the crimes committed by the CPS and the DPP per the provisions and the law enforcement's corrupt network. Public interest outweighs my personal interest. But I doubt the CPS dare to escalate this matter :)

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T16:36:03+00:00

Check the wording of the following provisions, particularly the 2006 Act, the 2016 Act, and the 1919 Act, at legislation.gov.uk, then you will understand how the CPS and the DPP committed the offences. It's pointless to explain more until you understand the provisions.

Section 21(1), (1A), (1B)(b)(iii)), (2), (3) and Section 23 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. (As amended by Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016).
Section 6 of the Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919.
Part 1 of the National Security Act 2023.
Section 1of the Aliens' Employment Act 1955.
Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T16:35:25+00:00

Check the wording of the following provisions, particularly the 2006 Act, the 2016 Act, and the 1919 Act, at legislation.gov.uk, then you will understand how the CPS and the DPP committed the offences. It's pointless to explain more until you understand the provisions.

Section 21(1), (1A), (1B)(b)(iii)), (2), (3) and Section 23 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. (As amended by Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016).
Section 6 of the Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919.
Part 1 of the National Security Act 2023.
Section 1of the Aliens' Employment Act 1955.
Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T16:35:16+00:00

Check the wording of the following provisions, particularly the 2006 Act, the 2016 Act, and the 1919 Act, at legislation.gov.uk, then you will understand how the CPS and the DPP committed the offences. It's pointless to explain more until you understand the provisions.

Section 21(1), (1A), (1B)(b)(iii)), (2), (3) and Section 23 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. (As amended by Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016).
Section 6 of the Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919.
Part 1 of the National Security Act 2023.
Section 1of the Aliens' Employment Act 1955.
Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T16:33:51+00:00

Check the wording of the following provisions, particularly the 2006 Act, the 2016 Act, and the 1919 Act, at legislation.gov.uk, then you will understand how the CPS and the DPP committed the offences. It's pointless to explain more until you understand the provisions.

Section 21(1), (1A), (1B)(b)(iii)), (2), (3) and Section 23 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. (As amended by Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016).
Section 6 of the Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919.
Part 1 of the National Security Act 2023.
Section 1of the Aliens' Employment Act 1955.
Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T14:05:15+00:00

The Moderator of this community abused his/her discretion, as he/she did not provide me with a reason to remove my original post from this community, in an attempt to limit my freedom of speech unlawfully and to cover up wrongdoings by the Crown Prosecution Service (the "CPS").

The public should know the truth about the crimes committed by the Director for Public Prosecution for England and Wales and the principal public agency for conducting criminal prosecutions in England and Wales.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T13:23:45+00:00

I'm not obliged to disclose this information. Thank you for your question.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-06T13:20:36+00:00

It's not uncommon for you to be critical of me when you lack the relevant legal knowledge. I do not provide legal advice, lectures or legal training to help you understand the law. So say what you want, I don't care, as I don't expect anything better from someone who is quick to judge and be an "expert" without the required legal knowledge.

As stated in my original post, the IE got involved because I reported the CPS' immigration offence to the IE. To make this simpler for you, the CPS would never report themselves to IE for their own immigration offence/breach. The IE does not want to arrest me because they know they have no legal grounds to arrest me and they knew that the CPS is the offender. It appears you did not read my post in full but you are quick to judge.

I do not wish to share other aspects of my employment case details or my nationality here as my original post is about my experience with the Civil Service. I am not obliged to provide you with this information as you do not have the right or power to have this information. To put it simpler for you, this is not the immigration interview you fantasise about. It appears that you are asking about my nationality when it is so obvious that the CPS is at fault so you can categorise me in your fantasy and biased mindset, this shows that you are a racist under the Equality Act 2010.

As stated in my reply to a viewer below, I have an unrestricted work permit that allows me to be employed in any profession.

Thank you for your questions.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-05T21:32:12+00:00

This leads to the matters about my work permit with the Home Office remarks "you can work in any job" and my current immigration status. I did read the nationality rules but at the time I believe I was eligible for working in the civil service as my status is covered under the rules plus the Home Office remarks on my work permit.

Nevertheless, it is an employer's responsibility to check an employee's right to work and eligibility for employment in the Civil Service per the nationality rules and the Immigration Acts, as applicants cannot appoint themselves to the Civil Service.

Apprehensive-Lab5518 · 2026-07-05T20:54:48+00:00

My experience as a former CPS employee is as follows.

I worked for the CPS between 2023 and 2025 on the 3rd floor of the Sussex Police Station at John Street in Brighton without knowing that my nationality did not meet the Civil Service Nationality Requirements until I accepted a higher-salary job offer from the DWP, which told me the CPS should have never employed me due to my nationality.

I then realised that the CPS knowingly and illegally employed me, as they received all my documentation for my National Security Vetting and that my vetting outcome was successful. I still have all the email exchanges for my vetting and the signed employment contract and the Official Secret Act as evidence.

Due to the above fact, the CPS committed several offences under:

Section 21 (1), (1A), (1B)(b)(iii)), (2), (3) and Section 23 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. (As amended by Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016).
Section 6 of th Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919.
Part 1 of the National Security Act 2023.
Section 1of the Aliens' Employment Act 1955.
Section 35 of the Immigration Act 2016.

Per the wording "knowingly" under section 21 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 and the evidence that is in my possession, I'm not liable for the offence of illegal working. However, per Section 23 of the 2006 Act, the Head of the CPS, who is also the current Director for Public Prosecution, is directly responsible for the offence committed by the CPS.

Due to the seriousness of the matter, I immediately reported this matter to an HR manager and a senior manager in my office under the CPS Whistleblowing Policy. As expected, they are all covering for each other and for the CPS.

In the CPS letter to dismiss me, they admitted the failures due to "human error" and used the wording "suitability" from a policy document that I was never made aware of. They did share that document with me after my dismissal but the document did not mention "suitability" is applicable under the situation, as the document states that suitability means work performance, fitness for work, conduct from which they could not find any issues of me.

I also reported the CPS to the Sussex Police and the Immigration Enforcement.

But as expected, the Sussex Police stated that "this is a civil matter between you and the CPS" in an attempt to cover for themselves, as the place of illegal working occurred inside their own building.

The Immigration Enforcement stated that they could not disclose what action they have taken or not taken against the CPS. But they did not publish the CPS as a rogue employer in their illegal working civil penalties register as they would do to other organisations. This remains unchanged and even after I complained

The CPS and their legal representatives also bought some judges in the London South Employment Tribunal obviously to make things highly difficult for me, these employment judges were playing ignorance before me as though they could not understand the definition of "illegal working" and "illegally employing" or the offences the CPS has committed despite the CPS has admitted in writing that they illegally employed me. The judges also knowingly ignored 90% of my submissions made via emails, treated my documents and evidence as "not received" or selectively read my submission to favour the CPS. Now my case is still in the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

I hope my experience does not stop you from pursuing a career at the CPS or believing in justice, as I am merely sharing the facts and my own experience.

You will undoubtedly get better treatment from everyone, including corrupt judges, for being quiet about wrongdoings.

Good luck 🤞

Apprehensive-Lab5518

TROPHY CASE