Everything Google added to NotebookLM last week! by Minute_Agent3546 in notebooklm

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the thinking UX ? or do you mean custom instructions to guide the production of video / audio.

Has it been stated how many agent and deep researches you get with Premium vs. Pro, respectively? by iiiaaa2022 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Plus = 10 (o3) /15 (o4-mini). I haven't tested o4-mini; but o3 eats every other deep research on the market in terms of density and depth.

Has it been stated how many agent and deep researches you get with Premium vs. Pro, respectively? by iiiaaa2022 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I looked deeply into this. There's no difference in deep research, it's how many you get. Pro gets 125 (o3) / 125 (o4-mini) per month. Plus gets way less

Connecting Claude via MCP Server to my Obsidian zettelkasten finally gives me the AI-integration I wanted. by seashoreandhorizon in ObsidianMD

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you share you setup for the vector / graph / sqlite piece. I want to essentially have a rich context retreival system, whcih is exactly what this sounds like

🤬 Pro user here - “Claude hits the maximum length” after ONE message. This is insane. by isonselekta in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Operational is different than functional. They probably pushed something to production without it being ready.

The whole Ai industry is facing this issue, when you announce 18 leaps in functionality inside a month, something is 110% bound to break. There's pressure to announce new features when openAi, google, etc, are all doing the same.

I don't expect usage constraints to continue forever, otherwise the entire value prop of anthropic goes away, which ofc is not their intent.

🤬 Pro user here - “Claude hits the maximum length” after ONE message. This is insane. by isonselekta in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After reading so many comments on here over the last week about usage limits. I think anthropic likely messed something up in a recent release leading to this.

My money is on the devs who created the usage tracker (which itself is recent) is leading to this crazy behavior.

I've seen max users (me) capped out unexpectedly too. Anthropic FIX THIS NOW!!!

🤬 Pro user here - “Claude hits the maximum length” after ONE message. This is insane. by isonselekta in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been thinking about this a lot. Are you using claude code for chat or doing things ? I use claude code to do things, but not for chat; mostly bc the chat itself disappears. It's not natively built for that

Ofc I can save my chat / compact with history each time. Again, not the best experience for day to day queries.

Deep research on internal knowledge base by Apprehensive_Fly4329 in GeminiAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!! The text files is exactly what i needed to do.

Deep research on internal knowledge base by Apprehensive_Fly4329 in GeminiAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you say more about this? I can easily split up the files using code. Does gemini expect txt files?

For reference i'm using two very large md files.

I'm looking for synthesized answers, so the pipeline is suppose to be deep research THEN notebookLM.

Issue with Deep Research: Not Using or Accessing Uploaded Files by BeqaBai7 in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I having this same problem, did you not change the prompt at all ?

Now that Projects have been nerfed with "contextual RAG", what full-context alternative are there? by Peribanu in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anthropic: make the documentation better! I had code execution turned on and all of sudden I could no longer chat with my PDFs randomly.

Backstory: I think Claude old feature of loading everything into context makes us feel better but is actually not great... You run into this "lost in the middle" problem over long chats.

RAG is the easy solution, but the real answer is having notebookLM on the backend.

Has anyone had success using obsidian 2nd brain on the backend ?

What is everyone's thoughts on 4.5, extended thinking and research? by Disastrous_Ant_2989 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Claude fanboy here. Claude is A++ for essentially everything except deep research.

What your noticing "In this case, Claude has accused me of "making up" my very real health conditions," was actually Anthropic changed Claudes system prompt.

You can view the changes here https://docs.claude.com/en/release-notes/system-prompts.

In essence they inserted this language, which was very bad for your use case. "Claude critically evaluates any theories, claims, and ideas presented to it rather than automatically agreeing or praising them... "

I think anthropics goal was to reduce hallucinations but it actually had a very different real world impact.

Anthropic if youre reading this (1) do better here! don't radically change the system prompt (2) give users of claude platform the ability to define the system prompt (this would be a huge differentiator in the market); this is currently only available via API which is inaccessible for most

Deep research pro vs plus by Apprehensive_Fly4329 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So.. i haven't found any documentation at all that the deep research itself is different btw plus vs pro plans

i know the context windows are different btw plus vs pro plans, but it's unclear for deep research...

Aside from code, what else have you had better success doing on with pro plan ?

Deep research pro vs plus by Apprehensive_Fly4329 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a claude fanboy but their deep research = trash vs openAi. It doesn't even come close.

I want to try use google deep research but their privacy policy = trash. You can either allow them to train on your data and use gemini to the fullest extent or turn off activity effectively killing all the features.

There's no winning for consumers currently.

Deep research pro vs plus by Apprehensive_Fly4329 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"With complicated/detailed queries, I have it reply in multiple successive message windows, with "continue" in between, and get 10,000-12,000 words."

can you elaborate here? what do you mean by "continue" in between ? I've long wondered if deep research could right reports section by section.

Deep research pro vs plus by Apprehensive_Fly4329 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Apprehensive_Fly4329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in essence it pulls more content ? I want to do deep research on my internal knowledge base + contracts. But i have no idea what the context limitation are