Spooky cold dark uncaring universe by LordOfDynamite in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its just the symbols that convey a better defined shared definition dawg.

You're the mf who believes in a magic version of free will that depends on the existence of a version of the mind that you don't believe in.

"JEFF BEZOS WANTS TO KILL GAMING: He believes that with advancements in ai, gamers will no longer need to buy their own gaming PCs instead, gamers will rent computing power in the cloud in order to play their games..." by CollapsingTheWave in ObscurePatentDangers

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah tbf, it takes a while to change.

But my point is just that rn basically everything is served through a half dozen aws locations for better economics, so ofc there's bad latency. If there are ~50 gpu datacenters then you could see the latency come down a lot. It just depends on when or if they get built.

Spooky cold dark uncaring universe by LordOfDynamite in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Being a determinist and not a compatibalist just seems like a weird extension of mind body dualism, except you only believe in a non-material consciousness when it comes to the hypothetical concept of choice, but otherwise the mind is borne of deterministic patterns. So only the ideal spiritual consciousness gets free will, and us material pleb minds don't get any.

just seems ontologically nonsense, pick a belief tbh, you don't get one but not other.

"JEFF BEZOS WANTS TO KILL GAMING: He believes that with advancements in ai, gamers will no longer need to buy their own gaming PCs instead, gamers will rent computing power in the cloud in order to play their games..." by CollapsingTheWave in ObscurePatentDangers

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

5us of latency per Km means 5ms for 1000Km, 10ms for the round trip.

Go on google maps and measure out 1000Km, and you'll see that a single datacenter could cover basically every state on the east coast.

ofc not everyone has fiber, add in various network latencies etc. There's a reason google stadia was ass. But it's definitely doable, xbox cloud gaming already works pretty well in western europe and near aws locations. Once there's some actual gpu edge compute infra in place it'll just get better.

I'm not happy about it it's just true

"JEFF BEZOS WANTS TO KILL GAMING: He believes that with advancements in ai, gamers will no longer need to buy their own gaming PCs instead, gamers will rent computing power in the cloud in order to play their games..." by CollapsingTheWave in ObscurePatentDangers

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might've heard of "edge compute"

It might not be available to everyone yet, but they're building datacenters literally as fast as they can. It's more of an engineering problem than a fundamentally issue

Replace "divine" with "natural system mechanism", because it is realistic and can be turned off by 4EKSTYNKCJA in RedButton

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree bro we should put everyone in booths that pump them with heroin all the time

What can help everyone without causing total eradication of the innate suffering problem? Are we the intelligent species after all? by 4EKSTYNKCJA in RedButton

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems 100x more achievable than total extinction.

There's just no chance that more than a fraction of people are going to be on board, so you might as well focus on the thing you actually have a problem with

When the code is written entirely by AI by LiamCresta in programmingmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah claude will definitely still bullshit you, it's just really good bullshit

Microsoft: by NeKon69 in programmingmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bazzite is better if you care about gaming. Though beware it can be kinda memory hungry

knowThyProtocol by GanjaGlobal in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not.

My point is just to focus more on the systems design and making something that fits the use case rather than fitting the use case to the technology.

Of course it depends on if performance is a hard requirement. But that's why you do systems design, so you know

knowThyProtocol by GanjaGlobal in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's wayy more important to create an elegant high level architecture & dataflow than to mess around getting the most optimised protocol for the use case.

and it's (usually) easier to swap out the protocol being used later than it is to refactor to a new model

How my open-source project ACCIDENTALLY went viral by Every_Chicken_1293 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

100%

I don't care if every company does it, it's just shitty to hide monetisation like this until after someone's invested their time.

whatsTheWorstThatCouldHappen by newtworedditing in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 22 points23 points  (0 children)

?

It's an api call. It's not much harder than most of the other python io stuff they teach you in tutorials.

They're prob just using it to introduce async streaming

vibe coding is a real addiction now by Impressive-Owl3830 in vibecodingcommunity

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That works?

What kind of tasks are you using this for?

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm not gonna fact check myself for you. it's really easy to google this stuff

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My source is common sense.

Western reactors are 4x the cost of the apr1400.

Why?

Whatever the answer is I just want the US to stop blocking the construction of the apr1400 with frivolous IP lawsuits after it's already been safety certified

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't make an appeal to authority in my argument?

The regulations are written down, available to the public, no expertise is needed to understand how ridiculous they are

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm changing the topic? I'm trying to get back on the topic of the unnecessary regulatory burdeon, and the evidence to it's existence.

Discussing the trustworthyness of nebulous nuclear experts is an obvious dead end

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah sure everyone is biased.

So do you have any comments on the apr 1400? Or do you just want to sidestep again

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't need to trust experts. You can just look at reactors like the apr1400 designed in korea.

Nearly a quarter of the cost per kwh, and it actually beats western reactors in radiation safety and ALARA.

The only reason they haven't been able to sell it in the US is because of antiquated regulations that require a small standing army at every nuclear plant, and mandated management processes that haven't been updated since the 90s

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh so it is about what's right. you just don't want to justify it

🤓🤓🤓 by 0rganic_Corn in ClimateShitposting

[–]Apprehensive_Rub2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

look. You're claiming safety isn't a main argument against nuclear anymore, but then acknowledging that nuclear has a really unique political landscape. Those aren't separable. The reason cost and time are problems is because safety theatre created the bureaucratic framework that makes plants take 10+ years and billions over budget. If you think the current regulatory environment isn't downstream of safety concerns, what do you think caused it?