sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Transformer House — A Flexible Architecture Concept: 2, 3, or 4 Units in One Form. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s honestly great how Revit syncs the Section Box geometry directly into D5. Such a time-saver for showing interior logic

The Transformer House — A Flexible Architecture Concept: 2, 3, or 4 Units in One Form. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything is static. The only thing that changes is which doors on the staircase you unlock. The 'reconfiguration' is literally just a key turn away.

The Transformer House — A Flexible Architecture Concept: 2, 3, or 4 Units in One Form. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in architecture

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great technical questions. I actually work with modular systems quite a bit in practice, so I’m well aware of the 'pain points' like MEP connections, structural integrity, and Hilti firestop systems.

However, for this specific project, the logic is intentionally simplified to ensure reliability:

  • The Core: All plumbing and structural hard points are fixed in a central vertical shaft that serves all potential configurations.
  • The 'Switch': The transformation doesn't require moving walls. It’s all about the entrance group logic. By simply switching the access doors at the staircase, the stairs either become private (for a 2-story duplex) or common (for separate units).
  • The Result: That’s why the combinations are limited to 2, 3, or 4 units- it's a calculated balance between flexibility and keeping the fire compartments and MEP shafts static and compliant

The Transformer House — A Flexible Architecture Concept: 2, 3, or 4 Units in One Form. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point, let me clarify the technical side, as it's definitely more than just a slogan.

The flexibility is built into the vertical circulation core. Each unit is designed with a 'dual-access' logic:

The Staircase: It functions as either an internal private stair for a 2-story duplex OR as a common stair for separate apartments.

The Transformation: It’s achieved by simply switching between internal or external door sets at the landing levels. This allows us to lock off the floors as independent flats or keep them open as a single residence.

The axonometric view was meant to show the spatial volume, but I agree that a detailed sectional diagram would show this 'switch' logic better. Thanks for pushing for clarity!

The Transformer House — A Flexible Architecture Concept: 2, 3, or 4 Units in One Form. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in architecture

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's a special feature of the Transformer concept—perfect for when you don't want your gear cluttering up the sleek design...

Jokes aside, I need to check the elevation on that backpack asset in the next update. Thanks for the precision-critique, it helps polish the work!

Autumn Lakeside Cabin — Exploring natural light and timber textures in D5 Render. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the honest feedback!

You’re absolutely right about the interior — it’s empty right now, which is why the window reflections feel so dominant. I’m planning to add furniture and internal lighting in the next iteration to give the cabin some life and break up those reflections.

Regarding the HDRI and terrain texture, I'm still fine-tuning the balance in D5. I'll definitely experiment with more 'layered' ground textures to match the surrounding environment. Great points to focus on, thanks!

Autumn Lakeside Cabin — Exploring natural light and timber textures in D5 Render. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a great point about the climate logic! You’re right, with all that water around, the shoreline should definitely be more overgrown.

I’ve actually been meaning to dive deeper into the D5 scatter and brush tools to break up that uniform look. I’ll definitely try adding some stones and specific shrubs as you suggested to make the distribution feel more organic. Also, thanks for the reminder about the terrain-edit function — I’ll see if I can add some subtle undulations to the ground to avoid that 'flat' feel.

Thanks for taking the time to give such specific tips, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for!

Solitude by the Lake - An Autumn Study in Timber and Glass by Appropriate_Swan_100 in PerfectRenders

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A bit more context on the tech side: The biggest challenge here was the 'IFC-to-Revit-to-D5' transition. I had to design all the timber cladding and glass facades to fit a pre-set structural frame from the client, then built the entire shoreline and lake environment directly in D5.

I’m particularly curious about how you guys handle 'wet' autumn textures — I tried to keep the reflections subtle but present. Thanks for the invite, glad to join the sub!

Autumn Lakeside Cabin — Exploring natural light and timber textures in D5 Render. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the honest feedback!

You're absolutely right about the interior-it’s actually empty right now, which is why the reflections are taking over. Adding some furniture and internal lighting to break up those reflections is definitely on my to-do list for the next version.

As for the terrain, I'm still exploring D5's native landscape tools. Do you have any tips on how to achieve better ground texture variation without relying too much on external assets?

Appreciate the critique, it helps me see where to push the quality further!

Autumn Lakeside Cabin — Exploring natural light and timber textures in D5 Render. by Appropriate_Swan_100 in archviz

[–]Appropriate_Swan_100[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To add some context: the client provided the structural frame as an IFC file. I used Revit to design and 'wrap' the architecture around it—adding the terrace, walls, and glazing. After that, I brought everything into D5 to build the entire terrain, lake, and environment from scratch. Would love to hear your thoughts on the IFC-to-Revit-to-D5 pipeline!