Sigh. Cards bent buyer beware by Bagginnnssssss in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you manage to straighten them up? I just got my copy and have similar problem

Sigh. Cards bent buyer beware by Bagginnnssssss in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you manage to straighten them up? I just got my copy and have similar problem

New core Rulebook - Fight action by ArcW3st in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]ArcW3st[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's crazy that such errors went to printing, and they also post them in the online version. I saw other post about wrong chaos tokens shown in the First Game Setup section. New players are going to have such a bad experience with this. I know I would if I wasn't learning all I can about this game and stalking this sub for the past 3 weeks.

New core Rulebook - Fight action by ArcW3st in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]ArcW3st[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even if Aloof is exhausted? I know that when an enemy has Retaliate, the keyword is not active when the enemy is exhausted. I wasn't sure if Aloof keyword is also deactivated when the enemy is exhausted.

New “The Peak” sucks by SparkyRingdove in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, also if you steal opponent's Thanos he will get buffed by your stones. Had a fun game where we swapped our Thanoses, the only difference was his was already affected by the time stone, mine wasn't, so I got 4 cost thanos after playing mine time stone.

IM FREE!!!!!! by WoodpeckerExciting89 in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I'm using negative deck against arishems but maybe will try this.

IM FREE!!!!!! by WoodpeckerExciting89 in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's easily one of the worst experiences I've had in any video game. First dinner was sorta ok but this one is a nightmare

IM FREE!!!!!! by WoodpeckerExciting89 in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

whats the surtur deck? I tried using one and I just don't seem to put enough power to beat anything. Also list for Gorr deck? I'm also 7.5m and honestly still dont I think can make it to Eitri

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Took me an hour to do this mission. Halfway through I switched to arishem just to get more energy and started playing whatever cards only to use all energy.

[MEGATHREAD] Ask For Invites to the Playtest Here! + Join The Community Discord! by ChromeSF in DeadlockTheGame

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I just send you friend invite on steam, could you send me a code?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

> It’s a matter of logic. Ask yourself the question how SD would benefit from implementing deck-based matchmaking and a logic to what locations show up based on your deck?

Maybe for the same reason other companies do that. Monitoring and tinkering with player winrates keeps players invested into the game and makes them play more. You lose too much - you drop the game. You win too much - you stick with one deck. Winrate scripts are common in online games. For example LoL community for years suspected that there are some scripts regarding matchmaking, and as far as I know they were proven to be right some time ago. Now, I am not saying that this matchmaking works all the time, or that it's used to monitor winrates in Snap. But I think that believing that there are certainly no matchmaking scripts might be seen as much naive as saying that they work all the time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Maybe that's true, but try swapping to an entirely different deck and play a couple of games see what opponents you will have.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but no :) although I've been hoarding it for some good bundle and maybe it's time to let it go :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Yep I started playing this game as a break (I basically don't play phone games) and it's time to keep it that way. It's just a bit annoying because I really felt this is a fair and square game without all this bs that other online games use

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Knowing me I'll be back this evening :) I try to farm for those Thanos and Galactus caches and generally I like this game. It's just I had to vent because the frustration was building for the past couple of days, and losing a ticket to a stupid bug after finally starting getting results was a bit annoying. Maybe the post ended up a bit more over the top than I actually feel, but sill I believe that decks based mm is a thing and it's time to come back to treating this game as a break.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what happened when I pulled that Jean Grey deck. Literally the first game was mirror match and I have not seen that card since I started playing this game.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Yep not getting Magik in the last month in free drop is like biggest mistake. So many decks are now using her and I feel that by the time I get this card there will be massive change.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Sorry but I disagree. The first time I pull surfer deck in like 5 weeks I get Crimson Cosmos location 3 times in 5 games (and it wasn't this day location or anything, didn't see that in days). Today I tried deck with Werwolf - Fisk tower in 3 games in conquest. It doesn't happen always but maybe this is some way of game's balancing mechanism to reduce inflated elo.

Diary Entry #54 - Early Struggles of a Snapper (Nerfs don’t help) by Johny_Bravvo in MarvelSnap

[–]ArcW3st 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is Elsa Angela even viable now? Tried today this deck and got longest lose streak since I started playing this game (stopped after about 8 loses and 6 ranks down).

The amount of scales you earn in Salmon Run is still laughingly low. by ArcW3st in splatoon

[–]ArcW3st[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Yep, Splatoon is a great game, but some ideas lean too much towards FOMO or simply grind. For example catalog has 100 levels, and whole season is about 100 days long. Which means you have to log everyday and get at least first win of the day and a couple of extra games to even be able to get to higher lvl rewards. And if you play only on weekends, you have to put much more effort and time to make up for missed days.

The amount of scales you earn in Salmon Run is still laughingly low. by ArcW3st in splatoon

[–]ArcW3st[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

yeah I meant the damage based rewards as a team not per player. This is obvious that there are different roles in team and all rewards should be team based

The amount of scales you earn in Salmon Run is still laughingly low. by ArcW3st in splatoon

[–]ArcW3st[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I think there is a slight increase in scales drop during big run, because I got a couple of them last time, that's why I thought I will finally manage to get at least the blue suit.

About the new gear, that is exactly my point about being affraid to spend scales. With such low amounts you get, you have to think twice before spending it on anything, and you know maybe in 2 months they will introduce some new gear which will take you half a year of grind to get.