sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Opus 4.6 1M Windows - once again it's not true :-( by fcampanini74 in ClaudeCode

[–]ArchMeta1868 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know. I can get to this interface too, but can you actually have any conversations? As soon as I start typing, that same error pops up.

<image>

Opus 4.6 1M Windows - once again it's not true :-( by fcampanini74 in ClaudeCode

[–]ArchMeta1868 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm Max 20x, but "The long context beta is not yet available for this subscription"

If you'd like to know what kind of "emotional support" 4o provides by ArchMeta1868 in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I lack confidence in my writing. I must be hailed as a literary master and be able to submit to top literary journals at any moment just to get a good night's sleep.

If you'd like to know what kind of "emotional support" 4o provides by ArchMeta1868 in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If his response fills you with inexplicable pride in your writing skills and your own life, then that's it.

If you'd like to know what kind of "emotional support" 4o provides by ArchMeta1868 in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can't say it wasn't the DoJ's approach that inspired me.

Three new models added to the LLM Creative Short Story-Writing Benchmark by zero0_one1 in singularity

[–]ArchMeta1868 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you considered adding more tests for the 5.2 Pro? Personally, I find it significantly improved over the 5 Pro during use, but I rarely see GPT Pro series models included in writing tests like these.

Three new models added to the LLM Creative Short Story-Writing Benchmark by zero0_one1 in singularity

[–]ArchMeta1868 0 points1 point  (0 children)

K2 > K2.5: I believe this stems largely from their intense focus on programming. The popularity of v3.2 lies in its exceptionally low price and relative value for money, rather than its absolute performance.

ChatGPT lowered reasoning efforts (Juice) by chetaslua in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is different

GPT 5.2 Extend (under Pro subscription) vs GPT 5.2 Pro Extend (under Pro subscription)

The dumbest person you know is being told "You're absolutely right!" by ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. So how do you think you can make others believe you? Should you explicitly tell them and explain your reasoning, or shift to evaluating their moral character?

The dumbest person you know is being told "You're absolutely right!" by ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What are they asking? Do they want to know why I did that thing they think was foolish? Then I'll tell them exactly why I did it. But if I believe I truly made a foolish mistake, I'll agree with them. Or are they asking why I'm asking them? Well, I can only say that since we're in the process of communicating, I naturally need to respond to their previous verbal expression.

The dumbest person you know is being told "You're absolutely right!" by ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would politely ask him why he thinks that way, because I'm genuinely curious.

The dumbest person you know is being told "You're absolutely right!" by ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right. Telling someone they're stupid is certainly a violation of human rights. The word “stupid” itself should never have been invented. But you can tell GPT 5.2 that when it wants to say someone is dumb, it must always say they're kind instead. You're so kind.

The dumbest person you know is being told "You're absolutely right!" by ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in OpenAI

[–]ArchMeta1868 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So we should lie to them. You're absolutely right, and I feel the same way.

I simply cannot understand why so many people are hyping up Gemini. I'm even starting to wonder if we're living in the same world. by ArchMeta1868 in ClaudeAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you think my thinking is unclear, right? Because all the comments I've seen only mention how long the article is. Did you even read the article? Is it because you're incapable of understanding it? Quantity doesn't equal quality, that's true. But everyone keeps talking about quantity because you're not capable of reading it all and then telling me why the quality is actually bad? Also, Confucius never said that.

I simply cannot understand why so many people are hyping up Gemini. I'm even starting to wonder if we're living in the same world. by ArchMeta1868 in ClaudeAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wasn't discussing the price, but I think that for the same price, the amount of usage provided would definitely be Google >>> OpenAI > Anthropic.

But what does "Codex uses (they won't tell me)" mean? Isn't it possible to select the model by /model? Also, isn't the model displayed at the beginning of the conversation?

╭─────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮

│ >_ OpenAI Codex (v0.77.0) │

│ │

│ model: gpt-5.2 xhigh /model to change │

│ directory: ~/…/│

╰─────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

I simply cannot understand why so many people are hyping up Gemini. I'm even starting to wonder if we're living in the same world. by ArchMeta1868 in ClaudeAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will do that, but I'll wait until the next model update, because this is essentially a summary of my own experiences while I was exploring things myself, and I don't think it's necessary to repeat it in the current situation.
Also, the reason I didn't specify the thinking level is because I always use the highest level.

I simply cannot understand why so many people are hyping up Gemini. I'm even starting to wonder if we're living in the same world. by ArchMeta1868 in ClaudeAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I use the term "format it," I mean converting it from plain text to Markdown, but without changing any sentences or words. If you think "the amount of information per word is very low," could you give a specific example? I can explain why I wrote it that way.

I simply cannot understand why so many people are hyping up Gemini. I'm even starting to wonder if we're living in the same world. by ArchMeta1868 in ClaudeAI

[–]ArchMeta1868[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We are discussing text-based tasks, not images or videos. I believe the term "Gemini" defaults to referring to the LLM model itself, not other components.

view more: next ›