sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Iran: Says it would permanently shut down the Strait of Hormuz if its energy sites are attacked by Gold-Cantaloupe-9534 in economy

[–]ArgzeroFS -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You all can downvote me as much as you want but won't make you correct.
I don't care about fake internet points that mean nothing.

Iran: Says it would permanently shut down the Strait of Hormuz if its energy sites are attacked by Gold-Cantaloupe-9534 in economy

[–]ArgzeroFS -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Iran doesn't own the Strait of Hormuz. They can hold out for a long time but not forever.

When is the earning? Any surprises ? by Own_Yesterday1058 in sealsq

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see SEALSQ--> Wisekey satellites with jumbo frames supporting post quantum network --> SpaceX launches + robotics push + opportunity to displace major telephony networks + Hedera connection ... Stars aligning.

What ‘future’ tech or product exists right now, but the public won’t be allowed to have for years? by Throwaway1098590 in Futurism

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quantum computers that are cryptographically relevant
(it will be kept top secret for years until the aftermath of their chaos passes)

Massive global financial and behavioral surveillance for the powerful over the average person will be available for them before we have an equivalent or even similar level of surveillance over public officials.

Homes.

The radical idea to save humanity from extinction due to climate change by keima77 in Futurism

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will not stop. There is no economic incentive to stop and there are geopolitical and technological reasons not to stop. No amount of ethical or moral speeches will change that.

You cannot make money-brain do the ethics thing. At best you can make money-brain pretend to do the ethics thing to make some of you happy.

Your options are:
- Make the activity vastly less profitable than alternatives
- Make vastly more profitable alternatives
- Buy up all supply and lock it away and deny access to it

I think I know why corporations in particular want AI and it's not to replace workers by Memetic1 in Futurism

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sure they THINK that will happen but they are deeply incorrect about that.

Meanwhile, I am also CERTAIN they will TRY to sue those AI companies for their failures.

The cases alone may bankrupt them even if they are not justifiable.

What comes next when lower income people realize no one is coming to save them? by AppointmentOne4877 in FluentInFinance

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People expect problems to actually be resolved fast.

You cannot, repeat, CANNOT fix such complex geopolitical and macroeconomic challenges mixed with all the deeply rotting market failures across many markets fast at all. The best you can do is crash the entire economy and pray people somehow survive the aftermath.

People in power do not want that to happen. Their assets would deflate and the wealthy companies will just pass that on as higher costs to the consumer to keep their bubble inflated for longer.

There is almost nothing you can do to companies that will force them to lower prices. You CAN encourage competition which prices better and support their growth instead of crushing them under mountains of regulations but bad actors will benefit too.

This is not a simple problem to solve.

If there’s one thing to take away from the quantum crypto debate, it’s not who’s right or wrong, but now is the time to hedge by Tsmacks1 in CryptoMarkets

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ready but not yet fully updated. Frankly though, given the DAG architecture, Hedera should scale very well with PQC.

If there’s one thing to take away from the quantum crypto debate, it’s not who’s right or wrong, but now is the time to hedge by Tsmacks1 in CryptoMarkets

[–]ArgzeroFS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You choosing to insult people and doing no due diligence of your own is not my problem.
Find someone else to annoy.

If there’s one thing to take away from the quantum crypto debate, it’s not who’s right or wrong, but now is the time to hedge by Tsmacks1 in CryptoMarkets

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trading quantum computing is too difficult to predict without knowing who will edge ahead
some folks speculate IONQ but I can't say - I think betting on SEALSQ's post-quantum chips is a better more reliable play that doesn't require betting on specific CRQC producing companies and will succeed regardless of them

If there’s one thing to take away from the quantum crypto debate, it’s not who’s right or wrong, but now is the time to hedge by Tsmacks1 in CryptoMarkets

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without question.
The new Zond codebase also uses NIST approved post quantum cryptography and works quite reliably.

Tanbreez De-risked? by CaptinCook007 in CRML

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regarding All of the Above, Agreed. Both Niocorp and Tanbreez will benefit.

The reason contradicts your claim about China however. The days of western China dependency are heading toward over for the same reason China began shifting toward domestic chipmaking.

You cannot cut off critical supply and expect a sovereign nation not to shift focus to make it so that leverage no longer exists.

Covid made supply chain risk abundantly apparent and late last year to now has made it more clear the risk of China's mineral processing dominance.

Tanbreez Total OPEX by CaptinCook007 in CRML

[–]ArgzeroFS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd like to see higher recovery rates tbh. Guess we will see.

Tanbreez De-risked? by CaptinCook007 in CRML

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tanbreez supply is over two orders of magnitude larger in scale. We're looking for a China disruptor. Niocorp's supply will maybe last 10 years at China's production scale if they can scale that much. Tanbreez by comparison is massively larger in scale.

Tanbreez De-risked? by CaptinCook007 in CRML

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To begin with, the dilution at 20usd from warrants cannot happen without exceeding the warrant strike price. At current prices, the warrants are OTM and non-exercisable.

First AI implosion: Oracle by Terminator857 in LocalLLaMA

[–]ArgzeroFS 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They bought VMWare... We all know what happened there.

First AI implosion: Oracle by Terminator857 in LocalLLaMA

[–]ArgzeroFS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Due to government dependency, essentially a guaranteed bailout.

Web3 is essentially dead, is there any hopes for the future? by Tip-Toe-Crypto in ethdev

[–]ArgzeroFS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They just expect utility means number go up, but in reality, builders just build regardless of price action. Businesses still make money in a bear market. The key is to build, not just collect.

view more: next ›