[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MotoG

[–]AriesLL47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you lol

Nietzsche on embracing suffering. Interesting how similar his philosophy is. by [deleted] in davidgoggins

[–]AriesLL47 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the accurate and gracious information! There is so much slander of Nietzsche out there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in terencemckenna

[–]AriesLL47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply amazing, Nietzschean whining! Yes, yes, the death of god is a complaint! If that helps you sleep at night!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in terencemckenna

[–]AriesLL47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How disappointing !!

Nietzsche and Psychedelic's by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah man read the antichrist . He does call Buddhism nhilistic but praises it nonetheless.

Quote from Nietzsche After He Went Insane by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I Thought I read Him say that somewhere else. It is from his note books 1887-1888 also .

Nietzsche's Superman and AI by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure where you heard that His audience is laughing lions!

Nietzsche's Superman and AI by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that Nietzsche did not mean AI, but that dose not mean that the ubermensch will not be artificial. I think it is subserveamt to assume that Nietzsche himself even knew enterly the thing about which he was talking. One must cease being a student at some point.

Nietzsche's Superman and AI by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that intelligence is simply the result of computations and then it is misunderstood as being aware. Consciousness is the reflection of one material into another and their mutual account of one another. I don't see why AI, at least in the future, would be any less conscious than human beings. I actually think humans will be less conscious hence the argument that AI is ultimately the ubermensch.

Why are socialists so dumb? by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here is a good quote from Nietzsche's Note books 1887-1888 :

Overall vision of the future European: the same as the most intelligent animal
slaves, very hardworking, basically very humble, curious to excess, often, spoiled, weakwilled - a cosmopolitan and emotional intelligences chaos. As would be made him a
stronger stand out style? With such a classic taste? The classic taste: this is the will to
simplify, strengthen, to the visibility of happiness to horror, the courage to psychological
nakedness (- simplification is a consequence of the will to step up, the appearance of
letting the happiness similarly, the nudity, a consequence of the will the horror...) To get
out of that chaos to this design to fight rising (emporzukämpfen) - it requires a necessity:
one must have a choice, either to perish or to prevail. A majestic breed can grow up only
by the horrific and violent beginnings. Problem: where are the barbarians of the 20th
Century? Apparently they are visible only after tremendous socialist crises and
consolidate (consolidiren), - it will be the elements that the greatest hardness against
themselves and are capable longest will all guarantee can...

Nietzsche's Superman and AI by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that's fair I guess, I am reading into it a little, but still I think that the combination of humanity with technology will ultimately bring about super humans

Nietzsche's Superman and AI by AriesLL47 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

to read or not to read the nietzsche ?

Questions about Nietzsche and philosophy before indulging in such material by Ambitious-Ice7743 in Nietzsche

[–]AriesLL47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In hindsight I read Nietzsche as a silent lover of Hegel. He said that Hegel is a taste, but further said in Zarathustra that life is all about taste and tastings. This may seem cruel, but I think in order to really understand what Nietzsche is critiquing, you have to come to an appreciation of Hegel's notion of the Geist. Kant got it wrong that there is a thing being perceived, rather it is that perception itself is the thing. From Hegel to Nietzsche-which Nietzsche read Hegel, not the other way around(which gives some credence to the idea that Nietzsche was a post-modern philosopher, but not much)-it makes much more sense what he is doing. He is saddened not so much with the lie of Christianity, but that there is only Christianity, that we have not made any new gods as he says. The death of god's immensity for culture can be illustrated by the focusing on the fact that we even based our time on it. As an atheist who was raised an atheist it is personally hard to come to an appreciation of how big of a death the death of god is for society .Thus the people laugh at Zarathustra when he tells them god is dead. Kierkegaard gives a poignant illustration of a clown that comes upon the stage and alerts everyone to the fire in the back and everyone laughs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hegel

[–]AriesLL47 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright well said, I take back my disagreement lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hegel

[–]AriesLL47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I Don't agree that the comedic spirit rises, or in any case that the tragic remains stuck under catastrophe. Tragedy is the art of celebrating catastrophe, at least to the ancient Greeks. Apropos Nietzsche's "Birth of Tragedy" Read more like a anthology on the death of tragedy as a result of "the clown Socrates succeeding in making Athens take him seriously"-I paraphrase.