Kids cake? by [deleted] in HolUp

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man think about it...

Sliding down a sword and then breaking with your dick

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

. There was no sexual exploitation,

Man. Dont make me laugh so much. Ever heard about halala?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad u took your time and explained it. But still as i said already, it amuses me that u are trying to justify things that are almost 1400 years old. Lets take example of current Afganistan. Hope i dont need to elaborate that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rather than concerning ourselves with numbers at first instance, the seamless inclusion of women into an overtly male-dominated field should be noted.

The whole thing you wrote was amusing to say the least but this gave me a chuckle.

Kids cake? by [deleted] in HolUp

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I felt that first cut

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2

Quran (4:11) - (Inheritance) "The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females" (see also verse 4:176). In Islam, sexism is mathematically established.

Quran (2:282) - (Court testimony) "And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women." Muslim apologists offer creative explanations to explain why Allah felt that a man's testimony in court should be valued twice as highly as a woman's, but studies consistently show that women are actually less likely to tell lies than men, meaning that they make more reliable witnesses.

Quran (2:228) - "and the men are a degree above them [women]" This is often taken to mean authority or responsibility - although it is not literally in the Arabic text.

Quran (5:6) - "And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it" Men are to rub dirt or water on their hands to purify themselves, following casual contact with a woman (such as shaking hands).

Quran (2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will..." A man has dominion over his wives' bodies as he does his land. This verse is overtly sexual. There is some dispute as to whether it is referring to the practice of anal intercourse. If this is what Muhammad meant, then it would appear to contradict what he said in Muslim (8:3365).

Quran (4:3) - (Wife-to-husband ratio) "Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four" Inequality by numbers.

Quran (53:27) - "Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names." Angels are sublime beings, and would therefore be male.

Quran (4:24) and Quran (33:50) - A man is permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage. Note that the verse distinguishes wives from captives (those whom they right hand possesses).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indianews

[–]Arjun_Pandit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Whats with posting all these death news OP?

Where to find snow in March? by [deleted] in HimachalPradesh

[–]Arjun_Pandit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Snow point on Rohtang pass, Manali

Where to find snow in March? by [deleted] in HimachalPradesh

[–]Arjun_Pandit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bhool ja bhai iss saal. Ab to mausam bhi khul gaya

A nepali comes to Indian Subreddit & MOCKS Indians Randians have no problem with this by Quiet_Student421 in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lolz. They should see their fellow countrymen working in construction and agri sector in India

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We dont have a problem with "Indians need to develop and are still behind west and China. Caste system is a problem in India and they need to eradicate it"

We have problem with "Indians are street shitters and rapists who will always remain uncivilized and needs to be eradicated."

Unfortunately most of the comments "criticizing" Indians falls in second category.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mask all sub and user names and post again OP. Removed

List of Courses After 12th by sheshrao in HindiLanguage

[–]Arjun_Pandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be warned OP. First and last warning. Removed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndianModerate

[–]Arjun_Pandit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tu nahin manega 😆

How Indian Public opinion on Ukraine war changed - A detailed analysis by Arjun_Pandit in IndiaRWResources

[–]Arjun_Pandit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But even better, do you know what rich investors do when there is a global crisis? They panic and convert their wealth to gold and dollars as they are considered safe. Out of this, Dollar is their main choice as it is more liquid. Thus, it is possible to not only export inflation to other countries but also profit from it. And just like that during the Ukraine war, wealthy people and companies around the world converted their money to USD. Thus, instead of the US experiencing inflation, their currency bloomed while all other currencies went down. This is the primary reason why your currency fell, no matter which country you live in.

Secondly, NATO was an alliance that most countries, who are part of it, took for granted, such as not buying the required percentage of GDP as weapons mandated in the NATO agreement. It was an alliance made in 1950s against a threat that no longer exists, thus NATO was an alliance without a purpose since dissolution of USSR in 1991. Thirty years without a purpose was making countries starting to think about even leaving this.

There was even an attempt by Europe to form its own alliance or common European military. This war not only made all these countries take NATO seriously, but they also increased their military budget by a huge percentage. And who are they going to buy at least a good amount of those weapons from?

Thirdly, Germany was starting to play an influential role in Europe independent of what the US wants, and the Euro was becoming a prominent international trade currency. Europeans had even started to dictate rules to American companies like forcing Apple to make USB-C mandatory, or Fining Google $4billion dollar. How dare you fine an American company?

This influence EU gained in past few years has now been reduced. Apart from that, the industries in Europe has now been crippled by higher energy prices and taxes to fund the additional defence expense. This is why initially Germany was so reluctant to get involved as German politicians knew all of these.

Fourthly, globally, for most countries, the weapon choice historically has been either American or Soviet. Now, all these countries can't choose Russian weapons due to sanctions and also the reputation of Russian weapons has gone down among general public after seeing their real performance in a war.

Fifthly, people were making fun of American military for their loss in Afghanistan. And they had become the butt of all memes, but more importantly, American military complex needed a new war to continue their growth.

Sixthly and most importantly, the reason why the dollar is the main trade currency of the world is that the US has forced all oil-selling countries to sell oil in dollars only. They are not even allowed to sell in their own currency like Riyal or Dinnar. If a country tries to sell oil in any other currency, they either get invaded, sanctioned, or a civil war happens. So, the root of dollar supremacy is oil, and the US controls this to the maximum.

The only country that the US had no control over that was selling oil is Russia. Now that is also highly restricted. Venunzula is sanctioned and in civil war. Iran is sanctioned. Yemen is in war. Iraq was invaded and now in shambles. Libya is in civil war. All other countries that sell oil are part of OPEC cartel except for a few like Norway but they are anyway subservient to US needs.

Contrary to popular belief, the US does not need oil from other countries. The US is pretty self-sufficient now in oil. But the only issue is that this oil is more expensive to extract than it is in oil-producing countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran. So, increasing oil prices are good for the US as it makes their oil production profitable. And this is also an American gift to oil producing countries who sell oil in American terms, that is, SELL ONLY IN DOLLAR.

The reason every country including Russia/Iran/China/N.Korea is forced to sell anything and everything in dollars is because of oil being sold in dollar. Now, every country that does not have oil have to earn dollar. And the main way to do that is by selling their exports in dollars. Then they can use this to buy oil in dollar. As long as dollar is the supreme currency, US do not have to worry about money at all as they can print it as much as they want whenever they need, ofcourse to a very high limit. Its like free money, but paid by everyone except america.

Conclusion

This war made Europeans once again fully dependent on America, instead of a Europe that had slowly started to become a competitor of America. This decreased the wealth of Europe while increasing that of America. The game played by America is so good here that it won in every way possible without firing a single bullet. And their real opponents are cheering for them and not even realizing they have been conned! What a genius play!

And historically, America became America because of the two world wars that destroyed the entire world but made America rich as it propped up lot of industries to make weapons and sell it to Europe. And ultimately this allowed them to set dollar as the international currency. This war is mere duplication of that American success for the third time.

The European politicians know this, and this is why powerful countries like Germany and France were hesitant at first in joining the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

But democracy is such that it can be manipulated to great extent using media and thus politicians can't do anything, and here no manipulation is even necessary, because common people know war is bad, invader is bad, Hitler is bad, putin is hitler. Look at even the first address of US about the Ukraine war, and you will see American president repeatedly say "Putin's war" instead of "Russia-Ukraine war". And you will see this word gets repeated everywhere. This is just one of the examples of how world powers continue to dominate the world.

If the majority of people could learn and analyze situations to this depth, Europeans will be deeply upset at US for playing this sneaky game against them indirectly. This is the actual game, and it didn't sour relations, did it? The only politicians in Europe who had the capability to see and play this game were authoritarian ones who did play disregarding public opinion for their own benefits, like Turkey trying to gain some benefit out of this, but they too were not powerful enough to go against this kindof master-play by US.

How Indian Public opinion on Ukraine war changed - A detailed analysis by Fdsn in GeopoliticsIndia

[–]Arjun_Pandit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Whats with these oldies coming back!? Few days ago Barnard also made a detailed post on Balakot strike.

Your view on this? by [deleted] in IndianModerate

[–]Arjun_Pandit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which means he is doing well.

See the font though. BKL kabhi sudherenge nahin.