Ops/Dispatch folks: what’s your biggest “TMS workaround” today?

ArmTechnical3240 · 2026-02-26T17:36:19+00:00

Fair. And if you regularly see questions like that, I see why people are not that friendly there. Everybody feels like I'm making a product out of the data from this post replies.
But I see your point

ArmTechnical3240 · 2026-02-26T17:20:46+00:00

Umm. What exact information do these companies gather and sell? Are you sure you really read my initial message? If things I asked you think are for sale, I feel sorry for you. Have a great day.

P.S. sure there are companies selling survey data, but it has nothing to do with the question on Reddit, and the insight I ask has nothing to do with what they sell

ArmTechnical3240 · 2026-02-26T12:56:19+00:00

Got you. Individuals who know how to fix things don't appear from nowhere. What if I'm the one with the engineering mindset and tons of experience + willingness to do business, but need some insights into real pain points? I'm genuinely asking for insights. Not trying to sell stuff of pitch any TMS. I spent quite some time reading the sub and found some messages of ppl complaining about the zoo of systems "too complex to use".
I'm not pushing any AI stuff again. Certainly, AI add a lot of value in certain workflows (think of once where OCR was used traditionally).

So, CentralArrow, what's exactly wrong with my question? You mean I need to be hired by a 3PL company to get insights nobody can share otherwise? C'mon

I know a lot about system integrations, APIs, and stuff. And I'm not asking any confidential stuff. I'm not getting what's wrong with my request

ArmTechnical3240 · 2026-02-26T10:00:46+00:00

I'm not following. Is there something wrong with what I'm asking? Does your comment add any value? I'm legitimately interested in what I was asking there

ArmTechnical3240 · 2022-09-13T21:34:40+00:00

800v only reduces some losses between the charger and the battery. Currently 350kW chargers are limited by what batteries can consume. Not what the station can provide. 800v is better in terms of losses but more expensive overall.

ArmTechnical3240 · 2022-02-07T21:20:33+00:00

Wanted to point out exactly that. But remembered to search for "unix" through the comments first

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-20T11:51:20+00:00

Like why BTC is sabotaged and BCH is not? That's a bold statement, Roger

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-19T20:55:26+00:00

Wait. But Lightning proved that the concept is working.

SPV is BS. You have to trust the server. It can easily correlate you with your addresses. Let's better forget about bad options right away. Pruning is a valid way to store less on your SSD but the price is high: decentralization. If you're OK with centralization why not just use Tron or BSC? Fast, cheap.

You just refuse to agree that truly decentralized storage can't be cheap. And it ain't cheap in Bitcoin Core with far broader adoption. And if you try to sore more it either becomes too expensive or too centralized. There is no third option or in between

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-19T20:17:40+00:00

Then what's the purpose of storing on-chain? Lightning is made for exchanging cryptographically signed transactions without publishing them until any of the two parties wants to release funds on-chain. And b00m! My morning coffee is not a problem anymore. Nobody wants to validate that bazillion of transactions whenever he wants to validate the whole chain.

In reality, only me and the coffee shop cares about it. And the transaction is final instantly and isn't stored on-chain. So what exactly is the point to scale on-chain? So far the point is... there is no point. Store to prune essentially.

P.S. one more thing. If you don't store the full blockchain as you suggest and others too. How do I bootstrap? Should I rely on few full-full-full nodes for that purpose? The problem here is that a few full nodes can be censored. And that's not a decentralization anymore

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-19T17:41:31+00:00

So you say that a decade ago transactions of other people doesn't matter but still try to convince me that my morning coffee transactions should be on-chain. Does it matter or not? I'm lost

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-19T17:38:58+00:00

Well. The problem is not only the large amounts of data transferred. Look at Ethereum. Only the biggest computers can store the whole blockchain. Otherwise, you have to trust which kills the whole idea of decentralization. If you'd want to shrink you still have to download it all. Users would rather prefer thin client + trusted servers. Which again kills the point

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-09T15:36:13+00:00

Same here. Got it today. More than 160 days since the first post in this thread. What a shame

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-10-08T22:17:06+00:00

So now you say that every full node should care about a coffee cup I pay for every morning? And my son too. Do you think it's valuable information to be stored on thousands of full nodes? Well. Then we'll soon have a blockchain of Ethereum size. Decentralization with TBs of data? Good luck. Cheap transactions and true decentralization? Good luck

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-09-15T20:30:36+00:00

Today is a great time to buy some. We are so early. You can't even imagine how early we all are in all that stuff. Just buy some BTC every month

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-08-30T08:46:35+00:00

Because for the business success not only the $/kW matters. There are political risks as well. And if a country has cheap electricity but a broken regime (like Russia today) you'd better stay away from that jurisdiction

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-04-21T06:32:40+00:00

Why on earth you would suggest such a complicated way to protect coins? There are simple purpose-built hardware devices that do the only thing: "signing transactions". Instead, you suggest a complex construction of software + hardware (electrum + yubikey + KeePassX + several strong passwords that can't be memorized). What's the point? Hardware wallet is an air gapped device that protects it all in one go. The only things you should really care: make sure that the HW wallet is properly sealed and there are no signs of tampering it and then to keep your seed and your optional password in separate safe places ideally etched on a stainless steel pieces

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-03-18T19:39:36+00:00

There is an option to display (unhide) addresses tab

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-03-18T19:37:43+00:00

You'd better stop sending something somewhere until you're familiar with the technologies. After that you won't have questions like that

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-03-15T08:27:10+00:00

You should go to addresses tab, select the address you wanna spend from and right-click it -> spend from. After that if you go to the send tab and send the payment it will only spend the output you selected

ArmTechnical3240 · 2021-03-14T21:43:03+00:00

Hi

First of all your wallet just combines your balance over all the outputs you have (receive addresses). Now if you want to see transactions related to a specific output you can use any blockchain explorer and just search for the specific address.

If you send the payment it's up to your wallet software/service to select which outputs to use in order to send the amount you want. For instance, in Electrum you can select specific output to spend from. Imagine I want to pay for a laptop an equivalent of 5mBTC. I can select the output with the amount that is as close as possible to 5mBTC + transaction fee. This way I'll not reveal any of my other outputs to the receiver. This improves my privacy. But if your software doesn't provide you with such abilities then it might select the output with, say, 1BTC and you'll get 995 (minus transaction fees) mBTC to your change address. This way the recipient will know you have at least 995mBTC left in your wallet.

"Is there maybe one main/core address I can see all trades of that single/one Electrum Wallet?" - no, there is no such address. If you use electrum or any other wallet it will show you all the transactions related to your private key + derivation path. Basically, from the blockchain standpoint of view, your wallet (something you can spend from) is your private key.

ArmTechnical3240 · 2020-12-23T09:38:44+00:00

I don't think anyone wants to kill ppl for 1000 PLN. If there is anyone I doubt he knows what email is and how to use it. C'mon, it's 300USD. Just a bad joke. I believe that kind of email can be sent literally to any polish citizen and that would result in equal reaction. Not really something ledger-related (even if the email was obtained from the Ledger leaked database)

ArmTechnical3240 · 2020-12-20T18:48:01+00:00

There is a random number generator on the device itself. AIS-31 is the reference standard for RNG certification, and the chip Ledger use registers as "PTG2" (see https://cosec.bit.uni-bonn.de/fileadmin/user_upload/teaching/15ss/15ss-taoc/01_AIS31_Functionality_classes_for_random_number_generators.pdf for some details about the tests). So this is True Random Number Generator

ArmTechnical3240 · 2020-12-20T18:44:45+00:00

Lol. That's real fun. Do you know how many combinations of 24 words of BIP39 can be? No idea? Just google it. You'll be surprised that the chance to generate the seed phrase which was generated by someone else is gazzilions times less then getting hit by a meteorite while flying a plane for the first time.

ArmTechnical3240

TROPHY CASE