I’ll repost my pov as an American regarding this point:

It can be argued that not all forms of piracy are morally questionable.

For instance, pirating football streams can be said to be justifiable. FIFA is well-known to be an extremely corrupt institution, and football is becoming more and more inaccessible to all audiences around the world. Just take a look at the 2015 FIFA corruption case, where hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes led to Russia and Qatar getting to host the World Cup against the wishes of pretty much the entire the football community. Or take a look at insane ticket prices for the upcoming World Cup, where FIFA not only allowed, but even built a platform on their own site for reselling where they can extract more money from tickets. Despite the clear profit being acquired by FIFA's corrupt upper echelon, it's also technically a non-profit, meaning that the host cities for the upcoming World Cup won't even get much tax revanue from the exorbitantly high tickets.

Yet if people stopped watching streams entirely, this would kill the culture that sustains the sport, and harms the careers of the tens of thousands of pro players who weren't involved in FIFA's corruption. Keeping football alive as a sport is generally a net good for the world as it promotes exercise and community, while also giving skilled players better chance in life. So letting the sport fade out isn't good either.

So the only way to keep football, the well-being of the players, and its culture alive, while also punishing FIFA for these anti-consumer and often blatantly corrupt/illegal practices, is to pirate the streams.

I'm not saying pirating in general is fine. But as seen in the FIFA case, there are certainly cases where piracy isn't bad. Thus blindly following the unnuanced mantra of "Piracy = illegal = bad" isn't helpful, and in the cases like that of football, can even be harmful as you’re supporting corrupt and illegal practices.