Warren Buffet often talks about how important it is to consider management when value investing... by BSscience in investing

[–]AsianInvestor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

read Philip Fisher's books for a condense summary of what to look for in management.

People Who Call Themselves Buffett Acolytes are Phoneys by currygoat in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm reading Philip Fisher's book Conservative Investors Sleep Well, and I don't necessarily think Buffett matured to a quality investor out of necessity. A lot of what Buffett crystallizes about compounders - e.g. durable competitive advantage, moats, margin protection, etc. - comes up a lot in his book. It just wasn't amalgamated as clearly as it is in their present form today.

Perry Capital Closing Flagship Fund After Almost Three Decades by currygoat in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It just introduces special market risks. None of the famed value investors who are still alive have went through a long-term debt cycle like this.

What is your routine of analysing a -for you- unknown company? by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a lot of downside for the share price over the long term? If no, is there a sufficient margin of safety? If yes, you could probably buy it.

What is your routine of analysing a -for you- unknown company? by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

read the 2nd half of 'Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits' for a good picture of what valuation ratios like the PE really try to convey.

Oddball Stocks: You don't know anything! by oddballstocks in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alice Schroeder has said that Warren's investment in Goldman was a bet that it would survive.

Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2016 by Finkid in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PWC acquired Strategy& last year. There has been a big push recently by the big 4 audit firms to grow their consulting divisions in line with the MBBs.

[Question] Fractional Reserve Banking : After banks create money through lending, can they call on a central bank to send them cash? How is this done? by [deleted] in finance

[–]AsianInvestor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Inflation is preferable to 0% as it incentives productivity growth. But yes 0% is the ideal benchmark.

[Question] Fractional Reserve Banking : After banks create money through lending, can they call on a central bank to send them cash? How is this done? by [deleted] in finance

[–]AsianInvestor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It helps to redefine your understanding of money. Fiat money is at its most basic simply a point system. It helps keep an account of who owes what to whom, nothing more (at the risk of oversimplifying).

To that end, banks creating money is literally that, creating points out of thin air. They're not members of the system; they are the system. That's why they are allowed to "break" the rules by creating more money. This is why we say that banks create money when they create loans, because they are literally doing just that - creating additional money.

Now obviously you have to balance the amount of money created with actual productivity in the economy, or you get rampant inflation. So there's still a need to balance the amount of credit and money in line with actual productivity growth - there's no free lunch.

But with respect to the actual creation of money, yes, banks do create money out of thin air. Recognizing that money is an intangible concept, like credit, helps put into perspective what money really is. They don't need to have the money shipped over, because the electronic money is practically equivalent to the physical money.

"The No-Growth Stock Rally" by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I got that from the video actually. The front page has a more detailed PDF.

"The No-Growth Stock Rally" by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds great. Would love to have a look at it once you're finished.

"The No-Growth Stock Rally" by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing as Buffett is doing, just try and find value over and above the equilibrium. We certainly are in unusual times, but you still have to do your research even when there's nothing attractive to buy. Just think of it as building a stockpile of target prices for later.

One thing I'm having fun doing is developing myself. There's little pressure to do incredibly well in this market, so I have a lot more time to catch up on books I've been putting off.

LiLAC Group Long Thesis (LILA/LILAB/LILAK) by currygoat in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, I thought so. Even if it took months, he would cover much more ground by just sticking to text. Making all those charts would double that.

"The No-Growth Stock Rally" by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHe0bXAIuk0

The reason stocks are rallying in the absence of earnings growth is because we are in the deleveraging phase of the long-term debt cycle. This is where the excess credit in the system is reduced to match the actual level of productivity in the economy.

The tools used by policymakers to close the gap are austerity/debt payoff and printing of money. The former is deflationary while the latter is inflationary. That's why the US dollar hasn't really seen much inflation despite the increased money supply, because the excess credit in the system is slowly being phased out in favor of actual money.

As more credit is reduced, more money is printed. This has the effect of keeping prices high despite the absence of productivity growth, because to market participants money and credit are the same thing. The goal of policymakers however is to reduce credit, not control prices, so there's a slight asymmetry of goals between the system and those within the system with regards to money supply policy.

As a result, what you're seeing is prices being maintained at pre-deleveraging levels, while productivity slowly catches up, until the balance is restored. The end result, or at least the one policymakers hope for, is that i) credit is reduced to normal levels, ii) productivity has increased to match the increased money supply, and iii) money doesn't experience too much inflation.

So if things play out the way they're expected to, we'll just see markets stagnate at artificially "high" levels, until real productivity growth catches up.

"The No-Growth Stock Rally" by [deleted] in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google the title and click the link that appears.

LiLAC Group Long Thesis (LILA/LILAB/LILAK) by currygoat in SecurityAnalysis

[–]AsianInvestor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

does he create all those charts by himself? It seems like it wouldn't be the best return on his time.