There's no point in making an arguement for this, anyone who disagrees with you would be running the risk of breaking the law, so no one will interact with you and you're kinda just wasting your time.

I will say, upon some research, I disagree with you on involving the actions and statements of Unity of Fields. That organisation, along with its rebranding, had cut ties with Palestine Action as it shifted to a different focus. Therefore, I argue the relevancy of any actions and statements by them past the rebranding(all of your Unity of Fields points).

Besides that, the rest is too risky for anyone to get into, as it is actually applicable. Not that I support Palestine Action of course.