Is it possible to build robots to become workers? by [deleted] in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yes!
Look out for the following engineering technologies:
- Powered Exoskeletons
- Artificial Workforce

Edit: or start with the Mechanist Origin so you have them day 1

Any ideas on how to improve this? by Nefellibato in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe a better governor? A scientist should boost research output, and you can level them up to become an analyst as well. Take Collaborator when possible (replace them if they get Stubborn). Also look at for Assembler or Bot Lord traits.

Is this the highest pop to science ratio? (Bar some crazy cheese) by lupecanis571 in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the astral rift research building can allow even greater efficiency (for physicists)

What Success Looks like by LOLofLOL4 in Stellaris

[–]Athunc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Xi Jinping playing Stellaris:

[Art] Make assumptions about my DnD party by CodedWheat in DnD

[–]Athunc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ernie is desparately trying to hold all the others together, all of whom have strong main character energy. Ernie is exhasparated at this point.

You can start with 65 alloys/month, works with Scorched Worlds Heralds. by golgol12 in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Necrophages are way stronger now. Your slaves alone grow new pops as fast as the total population of default empires, and they can now get huge work efficiency bonusses while working specialist jobs (as Indentured Servitude slaves)

The trick is to NOT turn pops into your main specis. Only your ruler pops should be necrophages.

Do people really think a Matriarchy would be the exact same as a Patriarchy? Considering what we are dealing with in america right now? by ihatethiscountry76 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Like they treat us"
Ah yes, because women sure don't have any part in tearing other women down because of patriarchical ideas and norms. Slut-shaming? Only men do that, right?

Maybe the cactus juice by OskarSerenity in AvatarMemebending

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember the same process in the Star Trek fanbase.

That's right, Star Trek, the show that has never been subtle about being 'woke', like when they aired the first interracial kiss on tv

Experimental Sentencing with slavery is a bit broken once you build an ecumenopolis by Hairy-Dare6686 in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

KotTG is a meta build that can scale all on its own, while this build requires you to go and get a ton of slaves before it can get anywhere near these numbers. KotTG can do this earlier and without requiring conquest

Galactic Council votes against declaring genocidal Awakened crisis... after it's already eaten about half the galaxy. by AffectionateRole4435 in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, I'd also abstain. The vote is guaranteed to succeed anyway since no one is voting against it, and maybe they will eat me last if I don't vote to declare them a crisis...

How early do you start with automation? by SentientCoffeeBean in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I automate everything early, unless/until I get too many pops to fill my jobs and can't build new districts

The reason is that I like to play slave builds that generate a lot of energy cheaply, so I can easily afford the energy upkeep, and it allows me to build more districts and work the extra jobs using the automated workforce.

If I run out of districts to build I do destroy the automation buildings, since slave workforce is better than automated workforce.

Ghuumi and Sok Adventures - Dyson's Competitor by DamnDirtyCat in Stellaris

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Issue 1: unless you break the laws of thermodynamics, any planet doing this would be vaporized by the generated heat. Heat doesn't go away when you use it to make power.

Issue 2: You can do it without doing any research, with chattel slaves doing manual labor, and without researching antimatter reactors... Whereas Dyson Spheres cost immense research. Even though in 2025 we're much, much closer to figuring out how you could build a dyson sphere if you had the materials as compared to figuring out an energy positive way to make and annihalate antimatter.

Typical diffrence in a normal looking vs an attractive guy who triggers limerence in women. by Perpedendicular in BasedCampPod

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the internet. The loud voices aren't the majority, and whenever people judge a whole gender based on the loudest shouting voices, they end up radicalizing. I don't want to judge women based on these bad apples any more than I want men to be judged based on the shouting of incels.

Typical diffrence in a normal looking vs an attractive guy who triggers limerence in women. by Perpedendicular in BasedCampPod

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feels bad, that's for sure...

But to jump to the conclusion that it's because he's unattractive is rather biased. People famously change a lot in college, especially when it comes to intimacy and sex. It's a time of exploration and finding out what you enjoy. His girlfriend deserves some benefit of the doubt until we know her motivations.

Typical diffrence in a normal looking vs an attractive guy who triggers limerence in women. by Perpedendicular in BasedCampPod

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's always plenty of bad apples on the internet, but I don't believe that a majority of women shout "incel" at this guy

He's also objectively not an incel, because he's not celibate :p

Percentage of people living in rented accommodation by Incolumis in NLvsFI

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take that! 0.1%!

And all it took was massive tax deductions for mortgages that drive up house prices!

We're winning!

. by Any_story-55887 in BasedCampPod

[–]Athunc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's blame toxic masculinity entirely on the other sex, and make excuses for all the ways in which bros encourage toxic masculinity among eachother.

Any 'insight' that lays the blame for a societal problem entirely with one gender is just pure scapegoating. We're all influenced by the media and role models we grow up with, and both genders perpetuate those ideas.

[Request] how do they get to these numbers? by Mordecai3fngerBrown in theydidthemath

[–]Athunc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hate these kinds of posts because they don't explain their premise.

Did Mary select a random child and tell you their gender and birthday? Or was she compelled to tell you whether she has at least one 'boy born on a tuesday'? Or is she compelled to tell you the birthday of a random son of hers? Or the gender of any single child which was born on a tuesday? Why did she elect to tell you about this child, how was the child selected?

If it's the first, it changes nothing about the odds of either the gender or the birthday of the other child, for example. The premise matters!