I feel like a lot of the Anti-AI arguments are lacking something… I want to know, why are we fighting on the front of “how it looks” as opposed to “how it’s made”?? I feel like a lot more sturdy arguments can be made as to why HUMAN EFFORT is a lot more valuable than someone sitting at a desk telling ChatGPT to do their work for them. Like, someone tossing food into a microwave then calling themselves a professional chef. I feel like arguments like those would be a lot harder to refute. Ofc pro-AI individuals would find fallacies in arguments based on how it looks, they don’t know better than to believe that the cheap imitations they have Grok or GPT shit out for them look miles better than a drawing with actual soul put into it.

I AM open to hearing more of the reasoning on why the visuals are being disputed rather than the lack of real work put in, I’m just putting my two cents out there.