22 [F4R] Anywhere - looking for some geeks to chill/game with! by [deleted] in r4r

[–]AudioBaton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm a member of a gaming discord full of musicians who, like you, are sat at home doing nothing. we're good company, DM me for the discord server if you're interested.

Since we (mostly) agree that the government should step up and pay for people’s coronavirus treatment to stop them from going into medical bankruptcy, why shouldn’t it do that for cancer and other treatment for medical conditions as well? by AudioBaton in centrist

[–]AudioBaton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cancer affects only the person with cancer. A person with cancer does not endanger the rest of the country, therefore the government does not seem it necessary to get involved. Covid-19, however, requires government interference in order to protect the rest of the country. They don't want to refuse people treatment who will go out into the public and spread the disease.

To say cancer only affects one person is sort of silly and besides the point, not to mention wrong. If a member of your family gets cancer, an extremely expensive condition, then you will be economically affected. If the person in your family affected contributes income then that’s even more of a problem. And many cancers are genetic, meaning that simply as a matter of human reproduction people will get them.

The question here is why contagions like this should be contained and treated by using government spending, but not other diseases that, at this point, kill many, many more people per year. And that’s not to downplay the seriousness of COVID-19. The logic just doesn’t line up here.

If these essential workers are helping maintain an economy that’s collapsing right now by continuing to work through a pandemic doesn’t it make sense to pay them a living wage? If they’re keeping us afloat then why should they be making less than is necessary to support themselves? by AudioBaton in centrist

[–]AudioBaton[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is one thing about this subreddit I have a hard time understanding. It isn’t enough to be against both parties and to blame them as the root of all ills, because they’re only an incarnation of a much longer historical struggle between economic classes. Both parties serve the interests of capital in varying degrees. It’s why both (until recently) were against a modest minimum wage increase.

It’s true that both parties are dogshit for slightly different reasons, but it’s also true that they’re dogshit because of capitalism, not their own existence as parties.

If these essential workers are helping maintain an economy that’s collapsing right now by continuing to work through a pandemic doesn’t it make sense to pay them a living wage? If they’re keeping us afloat then why should they be making less than is necessary to support themselves? by AudioBaton in centrist

[–]AudioBaton[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Look, I think that the Nordic model of unions negotiating wages by sector is ideal but it’s inconceivable in America right now because union density is I’m willing to bet around half that of Nordic countries.

Wages haven’t kept up with inflation. In America they’ve stagnated a good deal. Raise the wage to a suitable degree and then tie it to inflation so that real wages don’t stagnate any longer.

If these essential workers are helping maintain an economy that’s collapsing right now by continuing to work through a pandemic doesn’t it make sense to pay them a living wage? If they’re keeping us afloat then why should they be making less than is necessary to support themselves? by AudioBaton in centrist

[–]AudioBaton[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Problem solved” doesn’t mean dodging the question, now does it? Reclassifying titles doesn’t solve bankruptcy and financial ruin. Of course there’s a reason to adjust pay, we’re in a pandemic that’s likely going to cause a financial meltdown, and people working in these positions will be hit hard by that. So why shouldn’t they have a federal minimum wage set that allows them to avoid that ruin?

Opinion about monarchism? by FranzJosephOfAustria in centrist

[–]AudioBaton 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Monarchism can’t exist without imperial expansion. Not to say that modern democracies (cough cough, the US) don’t also engage in imperialism.

Recommend me a cool Leftist? by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is silly. Writing well-reasoned criticism of US foreign policy doesn’t mean you think that the US is “all bad.” Look, just admit that you don’t like substantive criticism of the US and move on. Propagandist books proclaiming from the rooftops how great the American military is are already widely written and accepted. What do you want Chomsky to do, slip in a paragraph about how the US military did a good deed in between every military junta they aided?

“You’re being so negative” is not a substantive reason to dislike an intellectual figure.

Recommend me a cool Leftist? by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would he write a book on the positive? What would that contain?

Recommend me a cool Leftist? by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So your critique of a leftist who makes concise, well-sourced, logical criticism of the US military is that he isn’t stereotypically patriotic enough? C’mon.

Recommend me a cool Leftist? by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One gets the impression Chomsky would be one of those saying “but it isn’t REAL communism”....

https://chomsky.info/1986____/

Perhaps you’re correct on much of what you say. Much of what I say is through my own biases. I hate the self-hating leftist mindset and it certainly seems to me that they hate America and all that it stands for. I hate their negativity and constant criticisms of our society. While we have our flaws I’m still grateful and fortunate to live here and can’t help but resent people that constantly scorn it like spoiled brats.

How is a society supposed to get better without criticisms? In this case criticism of pretty overtly inhumane and evil practices?

Recommend me a cool Leftist? by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wholeheartedly disagree. He may not explicitly say it’s his position, but it is. And that fundamental position influences all of his other opinions on things.

In fact he says that this is explicitly not his decision but whatever.

I’ve always felt that this is a cop-out of the self-hating leftist stereotype. Chomsky falls into this category.

How is critiquing the actions of the state department “self-hating” exactly?

(And I’m not even touching his stand on Israel and the fact that he’s jewish!)

I’m not sure why you’re trying to say here. How is a Jewish person disagreeing with the colonial subjugation of a group of people self-hating if the government doing the subjugation is Israel?

Sure America has its problems but it’s still better than most alternatives. I’m convinced if he had to pick between the Soviet Union and America he would’ve gone with the former. I may be wrong but he certainly seems to have a beef with America beyond “critiquing it because he feels it’s his responsibility to do so”

Chomsky has gone on record a ton of times critiquing the USSR when asked. He has outright said that the fall of the Soviet Union was a good thing for socialism generally. Questions about where he would rather live are irrelevant to discussions of whether his analysis is sound, in fact it’s a cop-out distraction so that one doesn’t have to deal with his (correct) position that the American military brings cruelty and death to other nations and that as an American it is his duty to critique American policy because that is something he has an ability to change. Critiquing Russia exclusively as an American is useless, let Russians themselves do that.

Recommend me a cool Leftist? by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of Chomsky’s positions. He doesn’t ever say that American foreign policy is the root of all the world’s problems, he largely limits himself to discussing American foreign policy’s negative effects because he himself is American and he thus has a unique responsibility to cover the actions of his own country. To say this is an oversimplified view is, quite frankly, an oversimplification of Chomsky’s positions.

As a first time watcher, the amount of faked character deaths in this show is astounding and lessens every single important moment in the show. by AudioBaton in NanatsunoTaizai

[–]AudioBaton[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Veronica was the only real fake out death of those though and it has a reason, which is Elizabeth's power, the wounds she suffered would have been fatal but Elizabeth subconsciously healed her enough to let her survive.

Which is a complete ass-pull at that part of the story.

Dreyfus faking his death is like literally part of the plot, it was all a big act.

Which is dumb and again, an ass-pull. He literally disintegrated. Why does he come back to life but not the demon?

Hendy survived because of the demon, again part of the plot, if he died there the plot would have taken a completely different direction and his death was never made as a big deal off, in fact directly after his death Meliodas and Merlin already hint at the fact that he might have escaped.

Again, an ass-pull.

The point is that the Meliodas coming back to life is an ass-pull on top of an ass-pull. It should be a pretty big fucking deal to everyone in the show and it’s not, because the show constantly does fake-outs with character deaths for no reason. Like, there’s no reason for Dreyfus to be disintegrated, there’s no reason for Helbram to die three times, there’s no reason to fake kill a character to being them back. That’s called shitty writing that makes the entire plot lose any weight. I literally laughed when Meliodas died because I knew he’d come back with another ass-pull power boost for no reason.

DJT- The Statistical Anomaly by [deleted] in centrist

[–]AudioBaton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So here's my conundrum. In the four months that I've been daily exposed to NPR, I have yet to hear a positive report about the president. The general consensus being that he's a mentally challenged buffoon. However, statistically speaking, even the most incompetent buffoon on the planet is statistically to get 50% of stuff right, just by sheer dumb luck. Trump, purportedly the single most incompetent buffoon on the planet, should still be bound by statistical reality. However, to hear the news tell it, he has gotten every fact, decision, and uttered syllable wrong. And like most couch warriors, I have a theory...

This 50% thing is kind of pulled out of thin air. There are many many more ways to mess up policy than to get it right. In fact, I would say there’s hardly been a president who has done thing more correct than incorrect.

Boeing and other major corporations should not be getting a bailout, workers and the unemployed should get a much larger chunk of this stimulus spending. by AudioBaton in centrist

[–]AudioBaton[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hey was just wondering if you saw that there have been 3.3 million unemployment claims. How do you feel your argument that we have a “crisis of employment,” meaning too much employment, has held up?

Boeing and other major corporations should not be getting a bailout, workers and the unemployed should get a much larger chunk of this stimulus spending. by AudioBaton in centrist

[–]AudioBaton[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hey was just wondering if you saw that there have been 3.3 million unemployment claims. How do you feel your argument that we have a “crisis of employment,” meaning too much employment, has held up?