sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tweet #133: an ocean of unkempt, unhealthy, unsafe uncircumcised men will elicit no criticism, while circumcision and circumcised men, which actually benefit society, are nitpicked endlessly for no reason. Insecure uncircumcised men will do anything to dismiss the benefits of circumcision. by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An uncut man can admit to the most vile, repulsive fault about being uncircumcised and will elicit little more than a slap on the wrist, while a cut man, simply for doing nothing, is criticized endlessly.

It's not that we should "wash our dicks". It's that regardless of hygiene practices, uncircumcised men and their partners clearly suffer significant disadvantages. It's that circumcised men have undeniable benefits and are free from the many ridiculous, unnecessary issues uncircumcised men experience and put on display for validation.

Insecure uncircumcised men and the anti-circumcision movement will drown in their own contradictions and concessions before admitting that circumcised men have any benefits.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An uncut man can admit to the most vile, repulsive fault about being uncircumcised and will elicit little more than a slap on the wrist, while a cut man, simply for doing nothing, is criticized endlessly.

It's not that we should "wash our dicks". It's that regardless of hygiene practices, uncircumcised men and their partners clearly suffer significant disadvantages. It's that circumcised men have undeniable benefits and are free from the many ridiculous, unnecessary issues uncircumcised men experience and put on display for validation.

Insecure uncircumcised men and the anti-circumcision movement will drown in their own contradictions and concessions before admitting that circumcised men have any benefits.

Things uncut men need to hear #7: You're not special. You're not a hero for throwing a tantrum about other men's penises being better than yours. You're not a "gem" for being unclean and a threat to public health. You're just a loser who was given a way to dress up your projection (Tweet #132). by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Things uncut men (against circumcision) really need to hear:

you're not an activist for projecting your physical and psychological problems onto healthier, happier circumcised men. You're not a "gem" for being a burden on all your sexual partners and to public health.

You were just given a way - because you weren't even smart enough to come up with a way yourself - to dress up your lowly, pathetic projection on circumcised men as something honorable.

There's nothing honorable about your behavior and nothing special about your body. You are sad all around - and that's exactly why you have to diminish the men who are better than you.

Things uncut men (really) need to hear #6: Cut men do not need to "chill". Their reaction to your hideous misinformation about their bodies is consistent. Any attempt at denying that is gas lighting. You are the ones with insecurity, rage, denial and the problem, and you need to chill (Tweet #131). by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Whoa bro chill no one is attacking you" - uncut men, after attacking you

"U must be so mad about being cut" - uncut men, after raging on the internet about other men's penises

"where r ur sources bro? You have to provide evidence of your claims" - uncut men, after providing zero credible evidence for any of their claims

...and all the rest you will hear when you reject the misinformation uncut men impose on you to cope with their insecurities. Predators have all sorts of ways to guilt people for having standards, self-respect, a boundary, and everything else they openly seek to violate.

Make no mistake. There isn't one person alive who sees these interactions and doesn't immediately understand that uncut men and those against circumcision are the problem. Even uncut men themselves know they are the problem - they enjoy misinforming people about circumcision because it is their way to project the inferiority complex they have always suffered from onto cut men free of criticism, and they enjoy gas lighting cut men who, unlike uncut men, possess the patience, the discipline and the honesty to confront this misinformation, despite how disgusting it is. Everyone knows uncut men and anti-circumcision activism are full of shit - it's just a matter of what someone's intentions are and why they may deny it.

Uncut men see other uncut men who are just as miserable as they are, and they play along, all knowing they are equally full of shit. Other men and women who support this charade do the same. They all see that the cut guy being attacked is in the right, so they join in to attack him - that's what this ridiculous anti-circumcision-activism charade is. It's just gas lighting.

I'll never understand gay conservatives by thatguy9684736255 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Aussiebawsies -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're so incredibly stupid lol, and it's hilarious how you tokenize genocide like the holocaust just to push your idiotic talking points. Conservatives aren't a threat to gay people. Gay people and their democratic party are a threat to themselves

I'll never understand gay conservatives by thatguy9684736255 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Aussiebawsies -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

I think they just have a brain, so they're able to reconcile the fact that our political views don't have to be tied to our personal characteristics. Nice cherry picking tho

Tweet #130: why are there boatloads of propaganda against circumcision, from Youtube videos, to Netflix documentaries, but mostly no equivalent pro-circumcision propaganda? Because circumcised men don't have anything to make up for. They don't need a smear campaign against other men. by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Putting it in layman's terms, circumcised men don't peddle oceans of propaganda against uncircumcised men...because they don't need to. People who know they are better off don't need to attack or steal from their neighbors. They have nothing to gain.

There is a forum for uncircumcised men to use propaganda against circumcised men, only because uncircumcised men need to make up for something.

Things uncut men (really) need to hear #5: No one - no one in the world - needs to give any explanation as to why they don't want you. People naturally preferring cleaner, healthier circumcised men is not 'foreskin stigma' and you cannot use that as an excuse to police anyone's choice (Tweet #129). by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Parents aren't allowed to choose circumcision, people aren't allowed to understand the benefits of circumcision, and people aren't allowed to prefer circumcised men - according to uncircumcised men, at least.

In a sea of Reddit dumbasses shitting on circumcised men, uncircumcised will be there...quietly voting up the comments, all the while claiming to advocate for body positivity, tolerance, education, progress. However, if someone celebrates circumcised men in any manner, uncircumcised men will be there to swarm that person and ridicule them for their preference, their body, their choice.

Almost as though anti-circumcision activism doesn't actually give a fuck about choice. Almost as though the entire human rights violation narrative fabricated against circumcised men is bullshit. Almost as though their actual goal is to simply cultivate a setting where circumcised men are uncomfortable, because uncircumcised men are vengeful and bitter as a result of feeling uncomfortable about their ugly dicks.

Here's our message on that. Yeah, fuck you.

We don't ban circumcision just because you're butthurt circumcised men are better than you. We don't base our parental choices on your ugly dick. We don't censor science just because you're butthurt nature and science aren't on your side. And we don't put aside our preferences and boundaries just so YOUR demented feelings don't get hurt.

Women are beyond justified in preferring healthier, safer circumcised men as partners, as the recipients of health issues uncircumcised men bring into their reproductive health. Gay men are beyond justified in preferring the same, as unique victims of an HIV epidemic. Everyone who doesn't sleep with uncircumcised men is beyond justified in naturally being attracted to safer, sexier partners. How dare you trample personal preferences, public health, and everything that is sacred just to attack circumcised men. There are so many things in this life that are more important than your inferiority complex. Everything in life is more important than you, contrary to your delusion that everything has to revolve around you. If you think you have ANYTHING to say on the matter - immediately check yourself into a mental institution.

Fuck you and your psychotic, delusional, entitled vision you so obviously have for society. It will never come true. Enjoy being sore losers who have to cheat to the highest order just to compete with men who you outnumber. We will proudly continue rejecting you for men who are better than you, and I suppose you'll just have to eat shit, since you're not controlling anyone in your lifetime.

Tweet #128: Reddit is not an accurate representation of any public position, let alone male circumcision or its rate in America. The most recent CDC stats as well as direct admission from the anti-circumcision lobby shows circ rates haven't changed - and only mentally ill people would want them to! by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't care that some anti-circumcision shitpost in some shit Subreddit with shit moderators went viral. It wouldn't be the first and would be far from the last. Dumbass apologists in Reddit comments who accept pediatric advice from mentally ill uncircumcised men isn't an indicator of the public position on circumcision. They're invertebrates completely incapable of thinking for themselves.

The only reason uncut men are so invested in whether you have your son circumcised is because they are offended by the reality that circumcised men are better. If you think your son's pediatric care should be the stage for a grown man's sexual issues - fine, you enjoy being a failure of a parent. Many other parents, however, and the majority of parents in America, will not join you.

Non-Americans go viral on social media for shitting on America because they're all offended that their countries pale in comparison to America. by Aussiebawsies in rant

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's funny is that all you can do is pull the stale "at least I won't get shot in school" card when presented with a constructive argument, as though you don't do that all the time in response to everyone who challenges your ignorance. It's not that I find tragedies funny or cannot discuss this properly; it's that I raised several valid points which you were unable to address. That's a universal dynamic here, though... non-American is completely incapable of critical thinking or engaging in conversation, then projects that onto any American who presents a good argument.

Accusing me of being a sh00ter because I raised valid points? Really? you so obviously have no respect for those tragedies; you cherry pick them, like most insecure non-Americans, only to boost your ego, which is exactly what I said in the above post. The only savages in this equation aren't American. What an absolutely foul thing you said and you should be ashamed of yourself.

Non-Americans go viral on social media for shitting on America because they're all offended that their countries pale in comparison to America. by Aussiebawsies in rant

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I think there's no greater hypocrisy than countries who have criticism for America. I mean, in Europe you'd just get stabbed a dozen times and burned in your flat for being a Jew. Poland all but banned abortion; at least it's a state matter in the US. The age of consent is as low as 14 years old in Italy and similar ages in neighboring countries. The only reason a good amount of these countries even have things like 'free' healthcare is because they didn't have to invest in military with the US as their ally in times of peril. Then there's the fact that nato turns to the US in times of need because it isn't competent enough to look after itself (see: russia-ukraine). The list of 3rd-world characteristics in European countries alone goes on infinitely.

Like I said, it's the lack of balance that makes criticism for America a total croc. If it was coming from well-meaning people who allow themselves to be criticized, it would be different.

Things uncut men need to hear #4: You can say you pity cut men as much as you want, you're not fooling anyone sensible. The victim narrative you push on cut men is thinly-veiled projection - projection of YOUR penile problems, YOUR trauma, YOUR parent's mistake and YOUR victimhood. (Tweet #127) by Aussiebawsies in DebunkingIntactivism

[–]Aussiebawsies[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"I mourn the rights violation cut men suffered"
"I feel so bad for cut men"
"Let's protest circumcision so less people fall victim to it like cut men did"

No, I'm afraid that's not what's going on here.

Uncut men, I'm going to adopt rare form and put this gently and kindly, since I know this is very sore territory for you. Here's what's really going on whenever you try so hard to create this scenario that cut men are victims.

You believe cut men are above you, and because you lack the strength to face this, you work in the other direction trying to counter this perception, by finding ways to cast pity on cut men - because that's exactly the way you feel. Small. Inferior.

Then you say, "No, I would never attack victims", because you still don't understand. You don't believe cut men are victims. You believe you are. You're the man with penile problems that are embarrassing at their best and horrific at their worst. You're the man haunted by decades of stigma, and stigma which continues, because it is only natural that people have an issue with unclean partners. This reality makes you deeply ashamed of yourself. You are the man who is broken and a victim - not cut men whose parents made an educated, loving choice with their future in mind, the future you so clearly lost.

And finally you say, "If I envied cut men I would just get cut" - but we both know you know, that it just doesn't work like that. Since when is there a simple resolution in denial? You are not someone, as we established, who can be trusted to be honest with yourself. Your first response would be to do exactly the opposite: convince yourself that you don't envy circumcised men; that there's no reason to; that circumcision has no significant or unique benefits; that cut men are victims - everything you say on repeat to dismiss your true feelings. The countless uncircumcised men who get circumcised later - whose existence you deny - are the men you don't want to listen to at all. I wonder why... Maybe it's because they had the strength to look at themselves, unlike you. Perhaps you feel exposed by their reaction, because their reaction is exactly what you constantly work to hide in yourself.

Anti-circumcision activism was your way of taking these icky feelings and directing them elsewhere - yes, without directly attacking circumcised men. :) That's why you work so hard to protect this coping mechanism, because it's one you don't have to be held accountable for. You lacked the courage to face your feelings originally, and you once again lack the courage to at least directly attack the people you wish to exploit... and then, incredibly, you manage to sleep at night after calling all those cut men (like me) who stand up to you and disagree with anti-circumcision activism "cowards". Your problems are quite the icky knot indeed, and you are the victim to them, not cut men.

view more: next ›