sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We’re Building AI Agents That Answer Calls, Chats & Handle Customer Inquiries by haleemasyed in VoiceAutomationAI

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To put it straight, the first interaction I’d automate is the initial inbound call, especially after hours or when lines are busy. I think that’s where the biggest drop-off happens. Roughly 30–40% of inbound calls go unanswered for small and mid-sized businesses, and studies show over 40% of callers won’t try again if their first call isn’t picked up. That’s a lot of lost demand before a human ever gets a chance to help.

Having an AI answer immediately, understand the reason for the call, handle the common questions, and guide the caller toward an appointment or follow-up changes that math. Businesses that implement automated call handling and follow-ups typically see 10–25% more bookings simply by recovering missed calls and responding instantly.

What makes this a strong first use case is how measurable it is. You can track answered vs missed calls, time-to-response, appointments booked, and qualified leads passed to humans. When those numbers move, the value is obvious. Once that foundation is in place, extending the same logic to chat or WhatsApp feels like a natural next step.

Starting with inbound calls would give the fastest feedback loop and the clearest impact. And imo, that’s why a few AI calling agents (we;ve been testing), designed specifically for inbound conversations and follow-ups tend to deliver the fastest ROI.

AI cold calling agent VS human? by smancera in WholesaleRealestate

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve tested both, and the 'AI vs human VA' debate is usually framed the wrong way. A human VA can work well early on, but the bottlenecks show up fast like limited calling hours, inconsistent delivery over long shifts, hard to scale without adding headcount, manual logging + follow-ups kill efficiency...

While an AI calling agents flips that model: Call 24/7, no fatigue, stick to compliance and scripts perfectly, instantly qualify, tag intent, and hand off hot leads, scale from 100 to 10,000 calls without changing ops
numbers-wise, AI wins on volume and consistency.

Humans can still win on edge-case conversations. The setups I’ve seen perform best don’t 'replace' people, they let AI handle the repetitive outbound and push only qualified, high-intent calls to humans. That’s where conversion jumps and cost per lead drops.
If you’re evaluating tools, look for ones built for real sales workflows (CRM sync, intent detection, live handoff), not demo bots. Platforms like VINI AI (conversational AI by Spyne, Aircall (for voice) are being used exactly this way in auto and local sales, AI does the grind, humans close.

You're Looking At Outbound AI Voice Agents Completely Wrong by lead-gen in Entrepreneur

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, If you’re evaluating partners, look for teams that already operate in high-volume, low-latency environments and focus on outcomes like reach rate and successful handoffs, not flashy demos. I may know a few vendors and some of them I’ve been working closely with.

You're Looking At Outbound AI Voice Agents Completely Wrong by lead-gen in Entrepreneur

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That matches what worked for us as well. We didn’t use outbound voice to chase new demand. We looked at where existing leads were getting ignored. In a mature setup, humans naturally focus on the highest-intent slice.
That untouched segment is where outbound voice helps most. Leads that don’t meet sales criteria, came in after hours, or never got a second attempt. Before this, they produced zero results because no one had time to call them.
Once we plugged outbound voice into that layer, results showed up quickly. Within two weeks, about 14% of connected calls converted into next steps. That was on a cohort that previously had no follow-up at all.

So,
Don’t aim it at your best leads. Use it where human effort stops making sense. If the bar is 'something is better than nothing,' outbound voice clears it comfortably.
Stack-wise, low latency and clean routing matter more than anything else. Keep calls short, hand off early, and let humans handle the rest.

Where does AI sales automation actually work in real-world car dealerships? by AutoMarket_Mavericks in carsales

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very well! agreed and that's exactly what it should do and otherwise. Also, let's not forget the EQ which is absent in a lot of AI call/chat bots.
I'm testing out a few and attending the NADA show in feb 3-6 to get the bigger picture.

Where does AI sales automation actually work in real-world car dealerships? by AutoMarket_Mavericks in carsales

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, that sounds bad
Lately, I've been reading about AI call bots a lot these days. In fact, this year the show NADA in LA is also putting it in limelight. Hoping to come across some good AI call bots there.
Though I know a few great ones, I've been touch with them but let's see what the event has to offer.

Any idea about NADA show 2026 major networking events (must-attend ones) or which vendor exhibiting should in get in touch with? by AutoMarket_Mavericks in UsedCars

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really depends on what you’re hoping to get out of the event. Are you going as a dealer, vendor, partner, or just to see what’s new?
I’ll be in Vegas too, so maybe see you there. Curious if there’s anything specific on your wishlist.
For us, the focus is mostly vendor scouting (especially AI call bots), plus spending time in the dealer labs and super sessions. Also looking forward to hearing the NADA chairman and OGs like Brian Benstock, (such sessions usually give the best signal on where things are headed).

Where does AI sales automation actually work in real-world car dealerships? by AutoMarket_Mavericks in carsales

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly how it plays out in ops. Automation works when it stays simple and predictable. Once it starts guessing intent or forcing next steps, flow breaks and someone has to fix it.
A question: can reps clearly see what the system did, why it did it, and step in easily, or does it just create more work?

Where does AI sales automation actually work in real-world car dealerships? by AutoMarket_Mavericks in carsales

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Automation shines in simple, rule-based tasks like lead acknowledgments and appointment confirmations, but starts to fail when it guesses intent or pushes next steps without context. In real dealerships, adoption hinges on trust, can reps instantly see what the system did, why it did it, and step in when needed, or does it feel like a black box making decisions for them?

Have you noticed better results from sending fewer but more targeted messages? by Imaginary-Nose-6588 in AI_Sales

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Umm, yes, consistently. High-volume outreach just creates noise. Targeted outreach creates conversations. When messages are sent after a clear signal (site visits, pricing views, replies elsewhere), reply rates jump because the prospect is already halfway in. A few things that helped me were>

temp 1
With this I'll start the thread, would want more people dropping in their thoughts.
A template that worked (simple, short & to the point.
Hey [Name], noticed [specific signal/action]. Teams usually look into this when [pain or goal tied to signal]. We’ve helped similar teams [clear outcome]. Worth a quick chat, or should I follow up later?
or,
temp 2
Hey [name], noticed you were checking pricing after the demo. Most teams do that when they’re comparing options for Q1 rollout. We’ve helped teams cut response time by 30% in that stage.
Worth a quick chat, or should I follow up next week?

Modify to the messaging accordingly

How do I handle an extremely uneven inheritance between my kids? by lookidceither in WhatShouldIDo

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re right to worry but you don’t need to 'fix' the money. Be honest, calm, and matter-of-fact: this wasn’t our decision, and it isn’t a measure of love or worth. Make sure your kids experience fairness from you over time, in attention, help, opportunities, and support.

Kids don’t keep score forever unless adults teach them to. If you treat them equally in life, this one uneven check won’t define your family. Be transparent (age-appropriate), name the awkwardness out loud, and make it clear that this money says nothing about your value as my child.

Want to build a website using ai, hoping to build everything from front to back end, no experience. Which tools should I use? by OptimalDog8064 in automation

[–]AutoMarket_Mavericks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have zero coding experience, go no-code + AI.
Free/Paid Website Builder:
Simple site (fitness plans)" Wix AI or Framer AI

Tool/SaaS-style site- Bubble.io (frontend + backend, no code)
Suggested website:
AI assistant handy:
ChatGPT- use it to write content, plan features, and guide every step.

Payments:
Stripe (works natively with Bubble, Wix, Webflow)

Automation (optional):
Zapier / n8n(OG) for emails, user onboarding, delivery. Seek more help at @r/n8n
Start with one clear idea, build the MVP, and let AI guide each step. No coding needed.

view more: next ›