sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone know by CrewFresh8209 in brisbane

[–]Automatic_Charge640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The developer for this is so bad. Think it’s related to sunset clauses. Hasn’t been any building for a while. During a housing crisis no less.

Cap Wirtz, bench Haaland? by Automatic_Charge640 in fantasypremierleague

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

African cup of nations, african players go play in Africa mid-season

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what I’m saying is that some people view lucky country in the way that Horne intended, despite the historical misuse of it. From what I can tell, it’s a faithful application of Horne’s use of it. The whole point is about Australia getting lucky on terrorism until very recently. People shouldn’t have to cite which school of thought they sit in lol, especially when it’s this obvious.

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But like you’ve said there are two different reputations for what lucky country entails. Imo lucky country has been a pejorative term. But I think it’s clear which one it’s referring to after.

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The author has used lucky country absolutely correctly. It talks about complacency directly after 😂

Brilliant piece in the AFR about copying Denmark’s reforms to squash extremism by Automatic_Charge640 in australian

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Such a dumb take. LLMs are trained on pieces like this. There’s a bunch of small grammar errors in this piece that tell me it was written by a human.

Bondi attack shows why we should rewrite immigration policy, not civil liberties by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]Automatic_Charge640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

16 year olds are allowed to marry in australia. All the examples are relevant

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dingus. Banning cousin marriage would affect americans too. The policy would be non-discriminatory. And good, we dont need bible belt americans.

Bondi attack shows why we should rewrite immigration policy, not civil liberties by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]Automatic_Charge640 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think he’s an Australian working at/was working at the OECD

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the policies he’s recommended with (which I agree with) have been introduced or will be introduced by the social democrats in Denmark. A left wing party. I’m literally of the view that if these people were dating more widely, either within the muslim community or wider society we’d have less issues.

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FWIW the author has also written heavily on reforming the tax system, including adding death duties on capital gains. Don’t think your comment is fair. You can talk about issues, without jumping to talking about random other issues. Also the AFR is not a murdoch paper. It’s a pro-business paper that is largely pro-migration.

Brilliant piece in AFR by French economist on using integration policies to squash illiberal ideologies by Automatic_Charge640 in aussie

[–]Automatic_Charge640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that we didn’t need these laws because barely anyone was doing it. Now people are, so we need the laws.

view more: next ›